Posterior quadratus lumborum block, a novel approach to treat chronic hip pain: a cohort study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
María T Fernandez Martin, Ignacio Aguado-Maestro, Jose A Aguirre
{"title":"Posterior quadratus lumborum block, a novel approach to treat chronic hip pain: a cohort study.","authors":"María T Fernandez Martin, Ignacio Aguado-Maestro, Jose A Aguirre","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18749-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip osteoarthritis is a common disease, and the pain associated with it has a major impact on morbidity and quality of life. Therefore, the management of chronic hip pain requires a multimodal approach to improve joint function and quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess whether the posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) reduced pain and enhanced quality of life in patients suffering from chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After Ethical committee's approval (no. PI 21-PI104 on June 26,2021) and registration (Trial registration number: NCT04438265) we started this prospective cohort study. The sample size calculated were 200 patients (100 per group) suffering from chronic hip pain with poor response to previous treatments. The intervention group received posterior quadratus lumborum block as an analgesic technique and control group did not. Pain (NRS) and quality of life (WOMAC questionnaire) were assessed at baseline, three weeks, three and six months in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data showed no differences between groups. The QLB group showed significant improvements in pain and quality of life at three months compared to baseline (NRS mean 7/4; and WOMAC mean 59/35) (P value=0.001), while the control group scores remained unchanged (NRS 7/8; and WOMAC (61/61). At three months, 50 patients in the QLB group showed an improvement more than 50% in NRS and WOMAC scores (ten of those patients had an improvement for more than one year). We observed that patients with avascular necrosis showed a minor improvement. Only two adverse events were registered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that posterior QLB could represent a minimally invasive option in chronic hip pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18749-X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hip osteoarthritis is a common disease, and the pain associated with it has a major impact on morbidity and quality of life. Therefore, the management of chronic hip pain requires a multimodal approach to improve joint function and quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess whether the posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) reduced pain and enhanced quality of life in patients suffering from chronic pain.

Methods: After Ethical committee's approval (no. PI 21-PI104 on June 26,2021) and registration (Trial registration number: NCT04438265) we started this prospective cohort study. The sample size calculated were 200 patients (100 per group) suffering from chronic hip pain with poor response to previous treatments. The intervention group received posterior quadratus lumborum block as an analgesic technique and control group did not. Pain (NRS) and quality of life (WOMAC questionnaire) were assessed at baseline, three weeks, three and six months in both groups.

Results: Demographic data showed no differences between groups. The QLB group showed significant improvements in pain and quality of life at three months compared to baseline (NRS mean 7/4; and WOMAC mean 59/35) (P value=0.001), while the control group scores remained unchanged (NRS 7/8; and WOMAC (61/61). At three months, 50 patients in the QLB group showed an improvement more than 50% in NRS and WOMAC scores (ten of those patients had an improvement for more than one year). We observed that patients with avascular necrosis showed a minor improvement. Only two adverse events were registered.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that posterior QLB could represent a minimally invasive option in chronic hip pain.

腰后方肌阻滞,治疗慢性髋关节疼痛的新方法:一项队列研究。
背景:髋关节骨关节炎是一种常见疾病,与之相关的疼痛对发病率和生活质量有重要影响。因此,慢性髋关节疼痛的管理需要多模式的方法来改善关节功能和生活质量。本研究的目的是评估腰后方肌阻滞(QLB)是否能减轻慢性疼痛患者的疼痛并提高生活质量。方法:经伦理委员会批准(no。PI 21-PI104于2021年6月26日获得)和注册(试验注册号:NCT04438265),我们开始了这项前瞻性队列研究。计算的样本量为200例(每组100例)慢性髋关节疼痛患者,既往治疗效果不佳。干预组采用腰后方肌阻滞作为镇痛技术,对照组不采用。分别在基线、3周、3个月和6个月对两组患者的疼痛(NRS)和生活质量(WOMAC问卷)进行评估。结果:人口统计学数据显示各组间无差异。与基线相比,QLB组在3个月时疼痛和生活质量有显著改善(NRS平均值为7/4;和WOMAC平均59/35)(P值=0.001),而对照组评分保持不变(NRS 7/8;和WOMAC(61/61)。三个月时,QLB组中有50例患者的NRS和WOMAC评分改善超过50%(其中10例患者改善超过一年)。我们观察到,无血管坏死患者表现出轻微的改善。仅记录了两个不良事件。结论:我们的研究结果表明,后路QLB可能是治疗慢性髋关节疼痛的一种微创选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信