DrIVeNN: Drug Interaction Vectors Neural Network.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Natalie Wang, Casey Overby Taylor
{"title":"DrIVeNN: Drug Interaction Vectors Neural Network.","authors":"Natalie Wang, Casey Overby Taylor","doi":"10.1089/cmb.2025.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple drugs to treat a single condition, is common in patients managing multiple or complex conditions. However, as more drugs are added to the treatment plan, the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) rises rapidly. Because it is impractical to test every possible drug combination during clinical trials, many serious polypharmacy ADEs (also known as drug-drug interactions or DDIs) only become known after the drugs are in use. This issue is prevalent among older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD), where polypharmacy and ADEs are common. In this research, our primary objective was to identify key drug features and build and evaluate a model to predict DDIs. Our secondary objective was to assess our model on a domain-specific case study. We developed a two-layer neural network that incorporated drug features such as molecular structure, drug-protein interactions, and mono-drug side effects (drug interaction vectors neural network [DrIVeNN]) using publicly available side effect databases. It performed moderately better than state-of-the-art models such as DGNN-DDI, KGDDI, and NNPS. DrIVeNN had average area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) scores of 0.934 and 0.920, respectively, compared to the best-performing baseline model, DGNN-DDI, which had scores of 0.919 and 0.904. We also conducted a domain-specific case study centered on CVD treatment, and there was a significant increase in performance from the general model. We observed an average AUROC for CVD DDI prediction of 0.979. This research contributes to the advancement of predictive modeling techniques for polypharmacy ADEs and indicates the strong potential of domain-specific models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15526,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2025.0079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple drugs to treat a single condition, is common in patients managing multiple or complex conditions. However, as more drugs are added to the treatment plan, the risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) rises rapidly. Because it is impractical to test every possible drug combination during clinical trials, many serious polypharmacy ADEs (also known as drug-drug interactions or DDIs) only become known after the drugs are in use. This issue is prevalent among older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD), where polypharmacy and ADEs are common. In this research, our primary objective was to identify key drug features and build and evaluate a model to predict DDIs. Our secondary objective was to assess our model on a domain-specific case study. We developed a two-layer neural network that incorporated drug features such as molecular structure, drug-protein interactions, and mono-drug side effects (drug interaction vectors neural network [DrIVeNN]) using publicly available side effect databases. It performed moderately better than state-of-the-art models such as DGNN-DDI, KGDDI, and NNPS. DrIVeNN had average area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) scores of 0.934 and 0.920, respectively, compared to the best-performing baseline model, DGNN-DDI, which had scores of 0.919 and 0.904. We also conducted a domain-specific case study centered on CVD treatment, and there was a significant increase in performance from the general model. We observed an average AUROC for CVD DDI prediction of 0.979. This research contributes to the advancement of predictive modeling techniques for polypharmacy ADEs and indicates the strong potential of domain-specific models.

药物相互作用向量神经网络。
多重用药,即同时使用多种药物治疗一种疾病,在治疗多种或复杂疾病的患者中很常见。然而,随着更多的药物加入到治疗计划中,药物不良事件(ADEs)的风险迅速上升。由于在临床试验中测试每一种可能的药物组合是不切实际的,许多严重的多药性不良反应(也称为药物-药物相互作用或ddi)只有在药物使用后才知道。这个问题在患有心血管疾病(CVD)的老年人中很普遍,其中多药和ade很常见。在这项研究中,我们的主要目标是确定关键的药物特征,并建立和评估预测ddi的模型。我们的第二个目标是在特定领域的案例研究中评估我们的模型。我们开发了一个两层神经网络,结合了药物特征,如分子结构、药物-蛋白质相互作用和单药物副作用(药物相互作用向量神经网络[DrIVeNN]),使用公开的副作用数据库。它的性能比最先进的模型(如DGNN-DDI、KGDDI和NNPS)稍好。与表现最好的基线模型DGNN-DDI的平均得分0.919和0.904相比,DrIVeNN的平均得分AUROC和AUPRC分别为0.934和0.920。我们还进行了一个以CVD治疗为中心的特定领域的案例研究,与一般模型相比,性能有了显著提高。我们观察到CVD DDI预测的平均AUROC为0.979。本研究为多药ade预测建模技术的发展做出了贡献,并表明了特定领域模型的强大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Biology
Journal of Computational Biology 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Computational Biology is the leading peer-reviewed journal in computational biology and bioinformatics, publishing in-depth statistical, mathematical, and computational analysis of methods, as well as their practical impact. Available only online, this is an essential journal for scientists and students who want to keep abreast of developments in bioinformatics. Journal of Computational Biology coverage includes: -Genomics -Mathematical modeling and simulation -Distributed and parallel biological computing -Designing biological databases -Pattern matching and pattern detection -Linking disparate databases and data -New tools for computational biology -Relational and object-oriented database technology for bioinformatics -Biological expert system design and use -Reasoning by analogy, hypothesis formation, and testing by machine -Management of biological databases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信