Role self-ascription of professionals conducting advance care planning conversations: A thematic analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1177/02692163251331168
Anca-Cristina Sterie, Mathieu Bernard, Ralf J Jox, Eve Rubli Truchard
{"title":"Role self-ascription of professionals conducting advance care planning conversations: A thematic analysis.","authors":"Anca-Cristina Sterie, Mathieu Bernard, Ralf J Jox, Eve Rubli Truchard","doi":"10.1177/02692163251331168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During advance care planning, individuals can benefit from the support of a healthcare professional to navigate the intricacies of decision-making. There are specific roles to be played at each level of the process. Evidence is lacking about how professionals understand their role when conducting advance care planning conversations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how professionals perceive, define and describe their role when conducting advance care planning conversations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted this exploratory cross-sectional study in Switzerland from November 2019 to June 2020 by using semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and thematically analysed with an inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fourteen professionals having received a training on advance care planning in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three themes: (1) role typology; (2) individual-centred and (3) professional-centred aspects related to role ascription. Roles that professionals undertake were aggregated in two overarching categories, 'facilitators' and 'counsellors', according to whether they prioritise individual's capacity to decide for themselves or their need to receive guidance towards a particular decision. In practice, roles fluctuate between these categories, according to the individuals (to what extent they are informed and eager to engage in autonomous decisions, their communication capacity and desires) or the professional (main profession and involvement in the person's care plan).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advance care planning requires professionals to be very adaptable and flexible in order to identify the role that they can play in each situation. Training needs to take into consideration this complexity and address it explicitly.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"700-708"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251331168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During advance care planning, individuals can benefit from the support of a healthcare professional to navigate the intricacies of decision-making. There are specific roles to be played at each level of the process. Evidence is lacking about how professionals understand their role when conducting advance care planning conversations.

Aim: To explore how professionals perceive, define and describe their role when conducting advance care planning conversations.

Design: We conducted this exploratory cross-sectional study in Switzerland from November 2019 to June 2020 by using semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and thematically analysed with an inductive approach.

Participants: Fourteen professionals having received a training on advance care planning in Switzerland.

Results: We identified three themes: (1) role typology; (2) individual-centred and (3) professional-centred aspects related to role ascription. Roles that professionals undertake were aggregated in two overarching categories, 'facilitators' and 'counsellors', according to whether they prioritise individual's capacity to decide for themselves or their need to receive guidance towards a particular decision. In practice, roles fluctuate between these categories, according to the individuals (to what extent they are informed and eager to engage in autonomous decisions, their communication capacity and desires) or the professional (main profession and involvement in the person's care plan).

Conclusions: Advance care planning requires professionals to be very adaptable and flexible in order to identify the role that they can play in each situation. Training needs to take into consideration this complexity and address it explicitly.

专业人员进行预先护理计划对话的角色自我归属:专题分析。
背景:在预先护理计划期间,个人可以从医疗保健专业人员的支持中受益,以导航复杂的决策。在流程的每个级别上都有特定的角色要扮演。缺乏证据表明专业人员在进行预先护理计划对话时如何理解他们的角色。目的:探讨专业人士如何感知,定义和描述他们的角色时,进行预先护理计划对话。设计:我们于2019年11月至2020年6月在瑞士进行了这项探索性横断面研究,采用半结构化访谈,并采用归纳方法对访谈进行转录和主题分析。参与者:14名专业人员在瑞士接受了关于预先护理计划的培训。结果:我们确定了三个主题:(1)角色类型学;(2)以个人为中心和(3)以专业为中心的角色归属方面。专业人员承担的角色根据他们是否优先考虑个人自己决定的能力或他们对特定决定的指导需要,分为两大类,“促进者”和“顾问”。在实践中,角色在这些类别之间波动,根据个人(他们在多大程度上被告知并渴望参与自主决策,他们的沟通能力和愿望)或专业(主要职业和参与个人护理计划)。结论:提前护理计划要求专业人员具有很强的适应性和灵活性,以便确定他们在每种情况下可以发挥的作用。培训需要考虑到这种复杂性并明确地处理它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信