Evaluation of risk factors for treatment failure in pertrochanteric nonunion repair.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Avrey A Novak, Brian J Vasquez, David P Barei, Michael F Githens
{"title":"Evaluation of risk factors for treatment failure in pertrochanteric nonunion repair.","authors":"Avrey A Novak, Brian J Vasquez, David P Barei, Michael F Githens","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the rate of failure and risk factors for treatment failure when operatively treating pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric femur nonunions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One Level 1 North American trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients from 2008-2022 presenting with intertrochanteric or pertrochanteric (AO/OTA 31A1.2-31A3.3) nonunions that underwent nonunion repair.</p><p><strong>Outcomes measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, which was defined as conversion to arthroplasty for reasons other than progression of pre-existing arthritis or persistent nonunion one year after nonunion repair. Patient demographics, caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, the presence of medial bone loss, index implant selection, complications, use of bone graft, and presence of atypical femur fractures were examined for association with treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients met inclusion criteria and had adequate follow-up to union or treatment failure (average 23.3 months, range 3-129). Mean age was 59 (range 24-93, SD 15.6), and 47.6% of patients were male. 42 patients (65.1%) were treated with an angled blade plate (ABP); 19 (30.2%) with a cephalomedullary nail (CMN). The rate of failure was 26.5% (n=17). In 23.8% of cases autograft was utilized (n=15), 11.1% a synthetic biologic (n=7), 17.5% allograft (n=11), and 11.1% with allograft and autograft (n=7). [A1] A biologic augment was more frequently utilized in patients treated with an ABP versus CMN (71.4% versus 42.1%, p=0.02). Of the 42 patients managed with ABP there were 14 treatment failures (33.3%), compared with 3 of 19 patients treated with CMN (15.8%, p=0.15). Active tobacco use was associated with treatment failure; 7 of 14 patients went on to treatment failure compared to 10 of 49 without active tobacco use (50% vs 20.4%, p=0.03). In 14 cases, (22.2%) there was medial bone loss noted at the time of revision. 50% of these cases (7/14) failed to unite compared to 20.4% (10/49) of patients without medial bone loss (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite variations in implant choice, use of biologic augments, and patient age a failure rate of 26.5% was observed in patients undergoing pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric nonunion repair. Medial bone loss and tobacco use were each associated with a 50% rate of treatment failure, highlighting consideration of these factors preoperatively when considering undertaking nonunion repair.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study - Level III. See instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the rate of failure and risk factors for treatment failure when operatively treating pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric femur nonunions.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: One Level 1 North American trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients from 2008-2022 presenting with intertrochanteric or pertrochanteric (AO/OTA 31A1.2-31A3.3) nonunions that underwent nonunion repair.

Outcomes measures and comparisons: The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, which was defined as conversion to arthroplasty for reasons other than progression of pre-existing arthritis or persistent nonunion one year after nonunion repair. Patient demographics, caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, the presence of medial bone loss, index implant selection, complications, use of bone graft, and presence of atypical femur fractures were examined for association with treatment failure.

Results: Sixty-three patients met inclusion criteria and had adequate follow-up to union or treatment failure (average 23.3 months, range 3-129). Mean age was 59 (range 24-93, SD 15.6), and 47.6% of patients were male. 42 patients (65.1%) were treated with an angled blade plate (ABP); 19 (30.2%) with a cephalomedullary nail (CMN). The rate of failure was 26.5% (n=17). In 23.8% of cases autograft was utilized (n=15), 11.1% a synthetic biologic (n=7), 17.5% allograft (n=11), and 11.1% with allograft and autograft (n=7). [A1] A biologic augment was more frequently utilized in patients treated with an ABP versus CMN (71.4% versus 42.1%, p=0.02). Of the 42 patients managed with ABP there were 14 treatment failures (33.3%), compared with 3 of 19 patients treated with CMN (15.8%, p=0.15). Active tobacco use was associated with treatment failure; 7 of 14 patients went on to treatment failure compared to 10 of 49 without active tobacco use (50% vs 20.4%, p=0.03). In 14 cases, (22.2%) there was medial bone loss noted at the time of revision. 50% of these cases (7/14) failed to unite compared to 20.4% (10/49) of patients without medial bone loss (p=0.02).

Conclusion: Despite variations in implant choice, use of biologic augments, and patient age a failure rate of 26.5% was observed in patients undergoing pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric nonunion repair. Medial bone loss and tobacco use were each associated with a 50% rate of treatment failure, highlighting consideration of these factors preoperatively when considering undertaking nonunion repair.

Level of evidence: Retrospective Cohort Study - Level III. See instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

股骨粗隆不连修复失败的危险因素评价。
目的:探讨手术治疗股骨粗隆及粗隆间骨不连的失败率及危险因素。方法:设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:一个一级北美创伤中心。患者选择标准:2008-2022年期间出现转子间或粗隆间(AO/OTA 31A1.2-31A3.3)骨不连并行骨不连修复的患者。结果测量和比较:主要结果测量是治疗失败,其定义为由于先前存在的关节炎进展或骨不连修复后一年持续不连以外的原因而转为关节置换术。检查患者的人口统计学特征、头-柱-骨干(CCD)角度、内侧骨丢失的存在、指数植入物的选择、并发症、骨移植的使用以及非典型股骨骨折的存在与治疗失败的关系。结果:63例患者符合纳入标准,在愈合或治疗失败后进行了充分的随访(平均23.3个月,范围3-129)。平均年龄59岁(范围24 ~ 93岁,标准差15.6),男性占47.6%。42例(65.1%)患者采用角度钢板(ABP);19例(30.2%)伴有头髓钉(CMN)。失败率为26.5% (n=17)。23.8%的病例采用自体移植物(n=15), 11.1%采用合成生物移植(n=7), 17.5%采用同种异体移植物(n=11), 11.1%采用同种异体移植物和自体移植物(n=7)。[A1]与CMN相比,ABP治疗的患者更常使用生物增强(71.4%对42.1%,p=0.02)。42例接受ABP治疗的患者中有14例治疗失败(33.3%),而19例接受CMN治疗的患者中有3例治疗失败(15.8%,p=0.15)。积极使用烟草与治疗失败有关;14例患者中有7例治疗失败,而49例未积极吸烟的患者中有10例(50% vs 20.4%, p=0.03)。14例(22.2%)在翻修时出现内侧骨丢失。这些病例中有50%(7/14)未能愈合,而没有内侧骨丢失的患者中有20.4%(10/49)未能愈合(p=0.02)。结论:尽管植入物的选择、生物增强物的使用和患者年龄存在差异,但在接受股骨粗隆和股骨粗隆间骨不连修复的患者中,观察到26.5%的失败率。内侧骨丢失和吸烟均与50%的治疗失败率相关,在术前考虑进行骨不连修复时,应重点考虑这些因素。证据水平:回顾性队列研究- III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信