Ahmed Saad Abdlkadir, Dhuha Al-Adhami, Mohammed Al Rammahi, Mohannad Badarneh, Salem Al Yasjeen, Khalid Al Busaidi, Aysar Khalaf, Haider Al-Alawi, Hasan Al-Alawi, Akram Al-Ibraheem
{"title":"Diagnostic pitfalls in [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging: a systematic review.","authors":"Ahmed Saad Abdlkadir, Dhuha Al-Adhami, Mohammed Al Rammahi, Mohannad Badarneh, Salem Al Yasjeen, Khalid Al Busaidi, Aysar Khalaf, Haider Al-Alawi, Hasan Al-Alawi, Akram Al-Ibraheem","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE) is an established somatostatin receptor imaging agent that has demonstrated superior efficacy in visualizing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and meningiomas compared with traditional [111In]In-octreotide imaging. Despite its enhanced affinity and sensitivity, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE imaging is not without challenges. To date, numerous diagnostic pitfalls and false-positive findings have been reported. This systematic review investigates the currently recognized diagnostic pitfalls in [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE positron imaging. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, with the most recent update on 8 March 2024. Two authors screened the titles and abstracts of retrieved articles and selected studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Qualitative analysis of 70 included research articles, encompassing 199 patients, identified 234 diagnostic pitfalls. Malignant neoplastic etiologies predominated, constituting 56% of pitfalls, followed by nononcologic pitfalls (32.1%), and benign oncologic tumors (11.9%). Anatomically, the head and neck region was the most frequent site for pitfalls (35.5%), followed by the musculoskeletal system (27.4%), abdomen (17.5%), and chest (16.6%). Pelvic-related pitfalls were least common, accounting for only 3% of cases. This study details potential diagnostic pitfalls, predominantly occurring in the head-neck regions - primary sites for meningiomas and paragangliomas. Understanding these diagnostic pitfalls is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Moreover, recognizing these diagnostic pitfalls may lead to novel applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE beyond its conventional use in NETs and meningiomas, potentially expanding its diagnostic utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE) is an established somatostatin receptor imaging agent that has demonstrated superior efficacy in visualizing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and meningiomas compared with traditional [111In]In-octreotide imaging. Despite its enhanced affinity and sensitivity, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE imaging is not without challenges. To date, numerous diagnostic pitfalls and false-positive findings have been reported. This systematic review investigates the currently recognized diagnostic pitfalls in [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE positron imaging. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, with the most recent update on 8 March 2024. Two authors screened the titles and abstracts of retrieved articles and selected studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Qualitative analysis of 70 included research articles, encompassing 199 patients, identified 234 diagnostic pitfalls. Malignant neoplastic etiologies predominated, constituting 56% of pitfalls, followed by nononcologic pitfalls (32.1%), and benign oncologic tumors (11.9%). Anatomically, the head and neck region was the most frequent site for pitfalls (35.5%), followed by the musculoskeletal system (27.4%), abdomen (17.5%), and chest (16.6%). Pelvic-related pitfalls were least common, accounting for only 3% of cases. This study details potential diagnostic pitfalls, predominantly occurring in the head-neck regions - primary sites for meningiomas and paragangliomas. Understanding these diagnostic pitfalls is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Moreover, recognizing these diagnostic pitfalls may lead to novel applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE beyond its conventional use in NETs and meningiomas, potentially expanding its diagnostic utility.
[68Ga] ga - dota - tyr3 - octreoate ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE)是一种成熟的生长抑素受体显像剂,与传统的[111In] in -octreotide显像相比,在神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)和脑膜瘤的显像方面表现出更优越的疗效。尽管具有增强的亲和力和敏感性,[68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE成像并非没有挑战。迄今为止,已经报道了许多诊断缺陷和假阳性结果。本系统综述调查了目前公认的[68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE正电子成像的诊断缺陷。使用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行系统文献检索,最新更新时间为2024年3月8日。两位作者根据预定义的纳入和排除标准筛选检索文章的标题和摘要以及选定的研究。定性分析了70篇纳入的研究文章,包括199名患者,确定了234个诊断缺陷。恶性肿瘤病因占主导地位,占56%的陷阱,其次是非肿瘤陷阱(32.1%),良性肿瘤肿瘤(11.9%)。解剖学上,头颈部是最常见的陷阱部位(35.5%),其次是肌肉骨骼系统(27.4%),腹部(17.5%)和胸部(16.6%)。盆腔相关的缺陷最不常见,仅占病例的3%。这项研究详细说明了潜在的诊断缺陷,主要发生在头颈部区域-脑膜瘤和副神经节瘤的原发部位。了解这些诊断缺陷对于准确诊断至关重要。此外,认识到这些诊断缺陷可能会导致[68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE在NETs和脑膜瘤中的传统应用之外的新应用,潜在地扩大其诊断效用。
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.