Limitations of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in Pelvic Trauma: A Retrospective Review of False-Positive Results and Non-Therapeutic Laparotomies.

Pankaj Kumar, Swastik Sourav Mishra, Mantu Jain, Sujit Tripathy, Kasthala Sanjay Raj, Siddharth Satyakam Pradhan
{"title":"Limitations of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in Pelvic Trauma: A Retrospective Review of False-Positive Results and Non-Therapeutic Laparotomies.","authors":"Pankaj Kumar, Swastik Sourav Mishra, Mantu Jain, Sujit Tripathy, Kasthala Sanjay Raj, Siddharth Satyakam Pradhan","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i04.5512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is an important adjunct for quickly detecting intra-abdominal hemorrhage. The study was aimed to identify the incidence of non-therapeutic laparotomies with positive FAST result and pelvic fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of prospectively maintained data was conducted to identify cases of pelvic fracture with positive FAST results. Cases with non-therapeutic laparotomies were analyzed for the cause of false FAST positive result. The data were collected and analyzed for the mechanism of injury, associated injuries and injury severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 195 cases of pelvic fracture with positive FAST result, only 5 cases (2.5%) had non-therapeutic laparotomies. Most were operated without a computed tomography scan due to hemodynamic instability. One patient was operated in view of peritonitis. Most common type of the injury requiring operative intervention was a vertical shear fracture. One patient was managed with an immediate external fixator, while three underwent a definitive pelvis fixation at a later date. One patient was managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FAST has a high sensitivity for intra-abdominal bleeding. However, retroperitoneal hematoma in pelvic fractures can lead to false-positive FAST results. Therefore, we advocate for a comprehensive approach encompassing clinical judgment, additional imaging for stable patients, the engagement of a multidisciplinary team, and surgical expertise to ensure optimal patient care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 4","pages":"245-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i04.5512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is an important adjunct for quickly detecting intra-abdominal hemorrhage. The study was aimed to identify the incidence of non-therapeutic laparotomies with positive FAST result and pelvic fracture.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of prospectively maintained data was conducted to identify cases of pelvic fracture with positive FAST results. Cases with non-therapeutic laparotomies were analyzed for the cause of false FAST positive result. The data were collected and analyzed for the mechanism of injury, associated injuries and injury severity.

Results: Out of 195 cases of pelvic fracture with positive FAST result, only 5 cases (2.5%) had non-therapeutic laparotomies. Most were operated without a computed tomography scan due to hemodynamic instability. One patient was operated in view of peritonitis. Most common type of the injury requiring operative intervention was a vertical shear fracture. One patient was managed with an immediate external fixator, while three underwent a definitive pelvis fixation at a later date. One patient was managed conservatively.

Conclusion: FAST has a high sensitivity for intra-abdominal bleeding. However, retroperitoneal hematoma in pelvic fractures can lead to false-positive FAST results. Therefore, we advocate for a comprehensive approach encompassing clinical judgment, additional imaging for stable patients, the engagement of a multidisciplinary team, and surgical expertise to ensure optimal patient care and outcomes.

骨盆创伤超声集中评估的局限性:假阳性结果和非治疗性剖腹手术的回顾性回顾。
创伤超声聚焦评估(FAST)是快速发现腹内出血的重要辅助手段。该研究旨在确定非治疗性剖腹手术中FAST阳性和骨盆骨折的发生率。材料和方法:对前瞻性数据进行回顾性分析,以确定具有阳性FAST结果的骨盆骨折病例。分析非治疗性剖腹手术患者FAST假阳性的原因。收集数据并分析损伤机制、相关损伤和损伤严重程度。结果:在195例FAST阳性骨盆骨折患者中,仅有5例(2.5%)行非治疗性剖腹手术。由于血流动力学不稳定,大多数手术没有进行计算机断层扫描。1例因腹膜炎行手术治疗。最常见的需要手术干预的损伤类型是垂直剪切骨折。1例患者使用即时外固定架,3例患者稍后接受骨盆固定。1例患者采用保守治疗。结论:FAST对腹腔出血有较高的敏感性。然而,骨盆骨折的腹膜后血肿可导致FAST结果假阳性。因此,我们提倡一种综合的方法,包括临床判断,对稳定的患者进行额外的影像学检查,多学科团队的参与,以及外科专业知识,以确保最佳的患者护理和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信