CUSUMIN Combination: A Cumulative Sum Interval Design for Phase I Cancer Drug-Combination Trials.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tomoyoshi Hatayama, Seiichi Yasui
{"title":"CUSUMIN Combination: A Cumulative Sum Interval Design for Phase I Cancer Drug-Combination Trials.","authors":"Tomoyoshi Hatayama, Seiichi Yasui","doi":"10.1002/pst.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, model-assisted designs, including a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design with optimal thresholds for determining the dose for the next cohort, have been proposed for Phase I cancer studies. Model-assisted designs are useful owing to their good performance in addition to their algorithm-based simplicity. In this era of precision medicine, drug combinations are widely used to enhance treatment efficacy and overcome resistance to monotherapies. However, identification of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) combinations is complicated because the joint toxicity order of paired doses is only partially known. BOIN and Keyboard combination designs are the only model-assisted designs developed to date. Further, both these combination designs show similar operational characteristics. Despite the simplicity and superior performance of model-assisted designs, they have not been sufficiently studied in Phase I drug combination trials. In this study, to provide a new design with simplicity and superior performance compared to model-assisted designs for dose-combination cancer Phase I studies, we extend the cumulative sum interval design (CUSUMIN) developed for single-agent dose-finding design based on statistical quality control methodology, which improves on BOIN and other representative model-assisted designs in terms of controlling overdosing rates while maintaining similar performance in determining the MTD. CUSUMIN can be expected to provide a safer assignment than that of BOIN in drug combination dose-finding studies while maintaining MTD selection performance, as shown in the single-agent dose-finding settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 3","pages":"e70007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, model-assisted designs, including a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design with optimal thresholds for determining the dose for the next cohort, have been proposed for Phase I cancer studies. Model-assisted designs are useful owing to their good performance in addition to their algorithm-based simplicity. In this era of precision medicine, drug combinations are widely used to enhance treatment efficacy and overcome resistance to monotherapies. However, identification of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) combinations is complicated because the joint toxicity order of paired doses is only partially known. BOIN and Keyboard combination designs are the only model-assisted designs developed to date. Further, both these combination designs show similar operational characteristics. Despite the simplicity and superior performance of model-assisted designs, they have not been sufficiently studied in Phase I drug combination trials. In this study, to provide a new design with simplicity and superior performance compared to model-assisted designs for dose-combination cancer Phase I studies, we extend the cumulative sum interval design (CUSUMIN) developed for single-agent dose-finding design based on statistical quality control methodology, which improves on BOIN and other representative model-assisted designs in terms of controlling overdosing rates while maintaining similar performance in determining the MTD. CUSUMIN can be expected to provide a safer assignment than that of BOIN in drug combination dose-finding studies while maintaining MTD selection performance, as shown in the single-agent dose-finding settings.

CUSUMIN联合:一期癌症药物联合试验的累积和区间设计。
最近,模型辅助设计,包括贝叶斯最佳间隔(BOIN)设计,具有确定下一队列剂量的最佳阈值,已被提议用于I期癌症研究。模型辅助设计由于其良好的性能以及基于算法的简单性而非常有用。在这个精准医疗的时代,药物联合被广泛用于提高治疗效果和克服对单一疗法的耐药性。然而,最大耐受剂量(MTD)组合的鉴定是复杂的,因为配对剂量的联合毒性顺序仅部分已知。BOIN和键盘组合设计是迄今为止唯一的模型辅助设计。此外,这两种组合设计显示出相似的操作特性。尽管模型辅助设计简单且性能优越,但它们尚未在I期药物联合试验中得到充分研究。在本研究中,为了提供一种与模型辅助设计相比具有简单性和优越性能的新设计,我们扩展了基于统计质量控制方法的单药剂量发现设计的累积和区间设计(CUSUMIN),该设计在控制过量剂量率方面改进了BOIN和其他代表性模型辅助设计,同时在确定MTD方面保持了相似的性能。CUSUMIN可以预期在药物联合剂量寻找研究中提供比BOIN更安全的分配,同时保持MTD选择性能,如单药剂量寻找设置所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信