Comparative Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-guided Sacroiliac Joint Block versus Conservative Management in Sacroiliitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Deepesh Laxman Chaudhari, E Pradeep, K V Arun Kumar, Sheik Mohideen, Silambarasi Nagasamy, Manoj Kumar
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-guided Sacroiliac Joint Block versus Conservative Management in Sacroiliitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Deepesh Laxman Chaudhari, E Pradeep, K V Arun Kumar, Sheik Mohideen, Silambarasi Nagasamy, Manoj Kumar","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dysfunction of the sacroiliac joint is a frequently overlooked etiology for lumbosacral and gluteal pain. This study compares the efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint (SIJ) blocks versus conservative management in patients with sacroiliitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was done involving 88 patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis. Group I (n = 48) received conservative management, while Group II (n = 40) underwent fluoroscopy-guided SIJ blocks. Outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire at baseline and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant progress was observed in both groups, but Group II demonstrated superior outcomes. The mean VAS reduction was greater in Group II (5.3 points) compared to Group I (3.1 points). Similarly, functional improvement measured by ODI was higher in Group II (55%) than Group I (39.9%). The EQ-5D-5L index value increased more substantially in Group II (0.42-0.79) than in Group I (0.41-0.67), with statistically significant differences between groups (P = 4.51 × 10-<sup>8</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided SIJ blocks provide significantly better pain relief, functional improvement, and life quality enhancement as compared to conservative management in patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis. This intervention should be considered for patients with inadequate response to conservative treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":"285-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dysfunction of the sacroiliac joint is a frequently overlooked etiology for lumbosacral and gluteal pain. This study compares the efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint (SIJ) blocks versus conservative management in patients with sacroiliitis.

Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was done involving 88 patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis. Group I (n = 48) received conservative management, while Group II (n = 40) underwent fluoroscopy-guided SIJ blocks. Outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire at baseline and 6 months.

Results: Significant progress was observed in both groups, but Group II demonstrated superior outcomes. The mean VAS reduction was greater in Group II (5.3 points) compared to Group I (3.1 points). Similarly, functional improvement measured by ODI was higher in Group II (55%) than Group I (39.9%). The EQ-5D-5L index value increased more substantially in Group II (0.42-0.79) than in Group I (0.41-0.67), with statistically significant differences between groups (P = 4.51 × 10-8).

Conclusion: Fluoroscopy-guided SIJ blocks provide significantly better pain relief, functional improvement, and life quality enhancement as compared to conservative management in patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis. This intervention should be considered for patients with inadequate response to conservative treatment.

透视引导下骶髂关节阻滞与保守治疗骶髂炎的疗效比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
引言:骶髂关节功能障碍是腰骶和臀痛的一个经常被忽视的病因。本研究比较了透视引导下骶髂关节(SIJ)阻滞与保守治疗对骶髂炎患者的疗效。材料和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究涉及88例诊断为骶髂炎的患者。组I (n = 48)行保守治疗,组II (n = 40)行透视引导下SIJ阻滞。在基线和6个月时采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和EuroQol 5维5级问卷(EQ-5D-5L)评估结果。结果:两组均有显著进展,但II组疗效更佳。与第一组(3.1分)相比,第二组(5.3分)的VAS平均下降幅度更大。同样,II组ODI测量的功能改善(55%)高于I组(39.9%)。II组EQ-5D-5L指数值(0.42-0.79)明显高于I组(0.41-0.67),组间差异有统计学意义(P = 4.51 × 10-8)。结论:对于诊断为骶髂炎的患者,与保守治疗相比,透视引导下的SIJ阻滞能显著改善疼痛缓解、功能改善和生活质量。对保守治疗反应不充分的患者应考虑这种干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信