Pharmacist-led interventions associated with symptoms identified by electronic patient-reported outcome battery: A descriptive study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Sara Sarpas, Ding Quan Ng, Daniela Arcos, Alexandre Chan
{"title":"Pharmacist-led interventions associated with symptoms identified by electronic patient-reported outcome battery: A descriptive study.","authors":"Sara Sarpas, Ding Quan Ng, Daniela Arcos, Alexandre Chan","doi":"10.1177/10781552251340922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAt the University of California Irvine (UCI) in Orange County California, we published an implementation study to evaluate the use of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tool to guide pharmacist-led chemotherapy education in newly diagnosed cancer patients. The goal of this secondary analysis was to describe the types of pharmacist-led interventions performed in the implementation study.MethodsUsing a pre-configured ePRO battery, patients' symptoms were assessed in seven domains (cognitive impairment, physical impairment, pain, depression, anxiety, fatigue, nausea/vomiting) at each infusion visit. Other symptoms that were brought up during the visit were also documented. Based on symptom scores calculated in real-time, pharmacists implemented personalized patient care strategies and documented them in the clinical notes. Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate the type of interventions employed for each symptom domain.ResultsAmong 250 patients enrolled, the average age of participants was 60 years old (SD = 14.6), with 129 (52%) being female, and 134 (54%) of participants identified as white. The preconfigured ePRO battery identified clinically important symptoms at 47.3% of the visits, and other clinically important symptoms were identified at 23.4% of the visits. Pharmacist education was performed for 311 (55%) of 564 visits examined throughout the study. The highest proportions of pharmacological interventions were performed to manage nausea/vomiting (51 visits), followed by gastrointestinal symptoms (21 visits), and pain (16 visits). Additional provider communication was performed for managing nausea/vomiting (14 visits), pain (9 visits), and neurological symptoms (9 visits).ConclusionWe observed a high rate of pharmacist-led education after the institution of ePRO to evaluate symptoms in patients undergoing anticancer treatment. Future studies should consider incorporating additional ePRO domains to include a wide range of patient-reported symptoms tailored to each type of anticancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251340922"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251340922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAt the University of California Irvine (UCI) in Orange County California, we published an implementation study to evaluate the use of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tool to guide pharmacist-led chemotherapy education in newly diagnosed cancer patients. The goal of this secondary analysis was to describe the types of pharmacist-led interventions performed in the implementation study.MethodsUsing a pre-configured ePRO battery, patients' symptoms were assessed in seven domains (cognitive impairment, physical impairment, pain, depression, anxiety, fatigue, nausea/vomiting) at each infusion visit. Other symptoms that were brought up during the visit were also documented. Based on symptom scores calculated in real-time, pharmacists implemented personalized patient care strategies and documented them in the clinical notes. Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate the type of interventions employed for each symptom domain.ResultsAmong 250 patients enrolled, the average age of participants was 60 years old (SD = 14.6), with 129 (52%) being female, and 134 (54%) of participants identified as white. The preconfigured ePRO battery identified clinically important symptoms at 47.3% of the visits, and other clinically important symptoms were identified at 23.4% of the visits. Pharmacist education was performed for 311 (55%) of 564 visits examined throughout the study. The highest proportions of pharmacological interventions were performed to manage nausea/vomiting (51 visits), followed by gastrointestinal symptoms (21 visits), and pain (16 visits). Additional provider communication was performed for managing nausea/vomiting (14 visits), pain (9 visits), and neurological symptoms (9 visits).ConclusionWe observed a high rate of pharmacist-led education after the institution of ePRO to evaluate symptoms in patients undergoing anticancer treatment. Future studies should consider incorporating additional ePRO domains to include a wide range of patient-reported symptoms tailored to each type of anticancer treatment.

由药剂师主导的干预与电子患者报告结果电池确定的症状相关:一项描述性研究。
在加州奥兰治县的加州大学欧文分校(UCI),我们发表了一项实施研究,以评估电子患者报告结果(ePRO)工具在指导新诊断癌症患者的药剂师主导的化疗教育中的使用。这一次要分析的目的是描述实施研究中由药剂师主导的干预措施的类型。方法使用预配置的ePRO电池,在每次输液时评估患者在七个领域的症状(认知障碍、身体障碍、疼痛、抑郁、焦虑、疲劳、恶心/呕吐)。访问期间提出的其他症状也有记录。根据实时计算的症状评分,药剂师实施个性化的患者护理策略,并将其记录在临床笔记中。采用描述性统计来评估每个症状域所采用的干预措施类型。结果纳入的250例患者中,参与者的平均年龄为60岁(SD = 14.6),其中女性129例(52%),白人134例(54%)。预配置的ePRO电池在47.3%的访问中识别出临床重要症状,在23.4%的访问中识别出其他临床重要症状。在整个研究期间检查的564个访问中,有311个(55%)进行了药剂师教育。进行药物干预的比例最高的是恶心/呕吐(51次就诊),其次是胃肠道症状(21次就诊)和疼痛(16次就诊)。为控制恶心/呕吐(14次就诊)、疼痛(9次就诊)和神经症状(9次就诊),进行了额外的提供者沟通。结论采用ePRO评估肿瘤患者症状后,药师主导教育的比例较高。未来的研究应考虑纳入更多的ePRO结构域,以包括针对每种抗癌治疗量身定制的广泛的患者报告症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信