Lucy Robinson, Felicity Dewhurst, Amy Huggin, Daniel Stow, Charlotte Stenson, Elizabeth Westhead, Katie Frew, Barbara Hanratty, Paul Paes
{"title":"Exploring older people's end-of-life care preferences over time: A scoping review.","authors":"Lucy Robinson, Felicity Dewhurst, Amy Huggin, Daniel Stow, Charlotte Stenson, Elizabeth Westhead, Katie Frew, Barbara Hanratty, Paul Paes","doi":"10.1177/02692163251331161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the evolution of end-of-life preferences over time is important for dynamic, person-centred palliative care. This is particularly relevant for older people whose preferences can be incompletely expressed and subject to change.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarise the nature of the current evidence about how and why the end-of-life preferences of older people change over time.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review was performed, using a predefined protocol and following the JBI manual for evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Final searches of Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were carried out in October 2023. Reference lists were also reviewed. Eligibility criteria included studies recruiting people over the age of 60 that explored how or why end-of-life preferences developed over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening identified 52 articles, reporting on 40 studies. A majority were longitudinal studies collecting quantitative data about treatment preferences. Other preference categories included euthanasia, balancing quality and length of life, goals of care, preferred place of death, decision-making and spiritual preferences. Studies explored a variety of factors that may influence preference change or stability. There was a lack of research with ethnic minority groups and people aged over 80.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing research has focused on preferences about specific therapies, at the expense of understanding what matters most to older people. Synthesis of the available evidence about why preferences change will guide reviews of patients' advance care plans. To inform dynamic, person-centred end-of-life care we need studies prospectively exploring how older people construct a broader range of preferences, and negotiate these over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"665-677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12102515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251331161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Understanding the evolution of end-of-life preferences over time is important for dynamic, person-centred palliative care. This is particularly relevant for older people whose preferences can be incompletely expressed and subject to change.
Aim: To summarise the nature of the current evidence about how and why the end-of-life preferences of older people change over time.
Design: A scoping review was performed, using a predefined protocol and following the JBI manual for evidence synthesis.
Data sources: Final searches of Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were carried out in October 2023. Reference lists were also reviewed. Eligibility criteria included studies recruiting people over the age of 60 that explored how or why end-of-life preferences developed over time.
Results: Screening identified 52 articles, reporting on 40 studies. A majority were longitudinal studies collecting quantitative data about treatment preferences. Other preference categories included euthanasia, balancing quality and length of life, goals of care, preferred place of death, decision-making and spiritual preferences. Studies explored a variety of factors that may influence preference change or stability. There was a lack of research with ethnic minority groups and people aged over 80.
Conclusions: Existing research has focused on preferences about specific therapies, at the expense of understanding what matters most to older people. Synthesis of the available evidence about why preferences change will guide reviews of patients' advance care plans. To inform dynamic, person-centred end-of-life care we need studies prospectively exploring how older people construct a broader range of preferences, and negotiate these over time.
背景:了解临终偏好随时间的演变对动态的、以人为本的姑息治疗很重要。这对老年人尤其重要,因为他们的喜好不能完全表达出来,而且容易改变。目的:总结当前关于老年人临终偏好如何以及为何随时间变化的证据的性质。设计:使用预定义的方案并按照JBI手册进行证据合成,进行范围审查。数据来源:最终检索Medline, Embase, PsycINFO和Web of Science于2023年10月完成。还审查了参考书目。资格标准包括招募60岁以上的人,研究如何以及为什么随着时间的推移,临终偏好会发展。结果:筛选了52篇文章,报道了40项研究。大多数是纵向研究,收集有关治疗偏好的定量数据。其他偏好类别包括安乐死、平衡生活质量和寿命、护理目标、首选死亡地点、决策和精神偏好。研究探索了可能影响偏好变化或稳定的各种因素。缺乏对少数民族和80岁以上人群的研究。结论:现有的研究集中在对特定疗法的偏好上,而忽略了对老年人最重要的是什么。关于偏好改变的现有证据的综合将指导对患者预先护理计划的审查。为了给动态的、以人为本的临终关怀提供信息,我们需要前瞻性地研究老年人如何构建更广泛的偏好,并随着时间的推移进行协商。
期刊介绍:
Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).