18F-FDG PET/CT guided salvage radiotherapy strategies for lymph-nodal relapses in gynecological cancers: SBRT vs ENRT.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tumori Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1177/03008916251336055
Andrej Fodor, Martina Midulla, Chiara Brombin, Paola M V Rancoita, Alice Bergamini, Paola Mangili, Miriam Torrisi, Lucia Perna, Emanuela Rabaiotti, Italo Dell'Oca, Chiara L Deantoni, Luca Bocciolone, Claudio Fiorino, Antonella Del Vecchio, Mariaclelia S Di Serio, Giorgia Mangili, Nadia G Di Muzio
{"title":"18F-FDG PET/CT guided salvage radiotherapy strategies for lymph-nodal relapses in gynecological cancers: SBRT vs ENRT.","authors":"Andrej Fodor, Martina Midulla, Chiara Brombin, Paola M V Rancoita, Alice Bergamini, Paola Mangili, Miriam Torrisi, Lucia Perna, Emanuela Rabaiotti, Italo Dell'Oca, Chiara L Deantoni, Luca Bocciolone, Claudio Fiorino, Antonella Del Vecchio, Mariaclelia S Di Serio, Giorgia Mangili, Nadia G Di Muzio","doi":"10.1177/03008916251336055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify outcome differences between extended nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), performed with advanced radiotherapy techniques, both of which were 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG) PET/CT guided, for lymph-node (LN) relapses of gynecological tumors, and to identify the most important determining factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of gynecologic patients treated in a single-institution with FDG PET/CT guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), or SBRT, were reviewed, and only patients at first salvage radiotherapy for LN relapses were considered. Local relapse-free- (LRFS), regional relapse-free- (RRFS), distant metastasis-free- (DMFS), disease-free-(DFS) and overall-survival (OS), as well as acute and late toxicity (with CTCAE v5.0 score), were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients (23 ENRT+SIB; 35 SBRT) treated for 178 LNs from February 2007-April 2023, were identified. Median biological equivalent dose (BED10) delivered to PET-positive LNs was 76.5 Gy (Interquartile range-IQR- 74.4;78.7) for ENRT, and 72 Gy (IQR 59.5;75.6) for SBRT. Median follow-up was 81.1(IQR 48.5; 117.2) and 37.0 (IQR 21.3; 58.4) months for ENRT and SBRT, respectively. Thirty-six-month estimated LRFS was 90.2% for ENRT and 82.6% for SBRT; RRFS was 69% and 63.4%, DMFS 26.1% and 44.3%, and OS 73.7% and 60.4%; no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups (logrank test, p= 0.29). ENRT recorded more acute (p⩽0.033), but not late, toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ENRT+SIB and SBRT for gynecological LN tumor relapses obtain similar results in terms of disease-free and OS, with fair toxicity. Prospective studies with higher patient numbers are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"3008916251336055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916251336055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify outcome differences between extended nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), performed with advanced radiotherapy techniques, both of which were 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG) PET/CT guided, for lymph-node (LN) relapses of gynecological tumors, and to identify the most important determining factors.

Methods: Records of gynecologic patients treated in a single-institution with FDG PET/CT guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), or SBRT, were reviewed, and only patients at first salvage radiotherapy for LN relapses were considered. Local relapse-free- (LRFS), regional relapse-free- (RRFS), distant metastasis-free- (DMFS), disease-free-(DFS) and overall-survival (OS), as well as acute and late toxicity (with CTCAE v5.0 score), were determined.

Results: Fifty-eight patients (23 ENRT+SIB; 35 SBRT) treated for 178 LNs from February 2007-April 2023, were identified. Median biological equivalent dose (BED10) delivered to PET-positive LNs was 76.5 Gy (Interquartile range-IQR- 74.4;78.7) for ENRT, and 72 Gy (IQR 59.5;75.6) for SBRT. Median follow-up was 81.1(IQR 48.5; 117.2) and 37.0 (IQR 21.3; 58.4) months for ENRT and SBRT, respectively. Thirty-six-month estimated LRFS was 90.2% for ENRT and 82.6% for SBRT; RRFS was 69% and 63.4%, DMFS 26.1% and 44.3%, and OS 73.7% and 60.4%; no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups (logrank test, p= 0.29). ENRT recorded more acute (p⩽0.033), but not late, toxicities.

Conclusions: ENRT+SIB and SBRT for gynecological LN tumor relapses obtain similar results in terms of disease-free and OS, with fair toxicity. Prospective studies with higher patient numbers are needed.

18F-FDG PET/CT引导下治疗妇科肿瘤淋巴结复发的补救性放疗策略:SBRT vs ENRT
目的:探讨18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET/CT引导下扩展淋巴结放疗(ENRT)联合同步综合增强(SIB)与立体定向体放疗(SBRT)联合先进放疗技术治疗妇科肿瘤淋巴结(LN)复发的疗效差异,并确定最重要的决定因素。方法:回顾在单一机构接受FDG PET/CT引导下调强放疗(IMRT)、图像引导放疗(IGRT)或SBRT治疗的妇科患者的记录,仅考虑LN复发首次补救性放疗的患者。测定局部无复发-(LRFS)、区域无复发-(RRFS)、远处无转移-(DMFS)、无病-(DFS)和总生存期(OS),以及急性和晚期毒性(CTCAE v5.0评分)。结果:58例患者(ENRT+SIB 23例;从2007年2月至2023年4月,35例SBRT治疗178例LNs。ENRT给pet阳性LNs的中位生物等效剂量(BED10)为76.5 Gy(四分位数范围-IQR- 74.4;78.7), SBRT为72 Gy (IQR 59.5;75.6)。中位随访为81.1例(IQR为48.5;117.2)和37.0 (IQR 21.3;ENRT和SBRT分别为58.4个月。ENRT和SBRT的36个月估计LRFS分别为90.2%和82.6%;RRFS分别为69%和63.4%,DMFS分别为26.1%和44.3%,OS分别为73.7%和60.4%;两组间差异无统计学意义(logrank检验,p= 0.29)。ENRT记录了更多的急性毒性(p < 0.033),但没有晚期毒性。结论:ENRT+SIB和SBRT治疗妇科LN肿瘤复发在无病和OS方面效果相似,毒性相当。需要更多患者数量的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信