Internalized Disability Stigma Among People Living With Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Umesh M Venkatesan, Shannon B Juengst, Lauren Krasucki, McKenzie Buszkiewic
{"title":"Internalized Disability Stigma Among People Living With Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Umesh M Venkatesan, Shannon B Juengst, Lauren Krasucki, McKenzie Buszkiewic","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Qualitative evidence suggests that disability stigma is an important concept in the lived experiences of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there have been no studies in this population specifically evaluating internalized disability stigma. We sought to characterize variability in levels of internalized stigma and examine the applicability of the \"why try\" effect (reduced self-efficacy and life goal attainment as consequences of internalized stigma) to people living with chronic TBI.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient research laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-four adults with chronic TBI (1.4-22.6 years post-injury).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Items were adapted from the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness questionnaire to capture disability-related internalized stigma and perceived discrimination. Primary outcome measures included societal participation and self-efficacy for TBI symptom management, which were assessed using validated instruments (Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective and TBI Self-Efficacy Scale, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Raw and residualized (adjusted for perceived discrimination) internalized stigma scores were normally distributed. Individuals who reported internalized stigma at levels greater than predicted by their perceived discrimination tended to have more recent injuries (d = .60) and poorer processing speed (d = .50) compared to those reporting relatively lower internalized stigma. Higher internalized stigma was associated with lower self-efficacy, which, in turn, was associated with lower societal participation (indirect effect = - .26, 95% CI = [-.50, - .09]), independent of mental health symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide preliminary support for clinically meaningful variability in internalized stigma among people with TBI, and for the applicability of the \"why try\" model to this population. Further theory-informed research could stimulate the development of behavioral health interventions for reducing stigma internalization and its harmful effects on post-injury psychosocial functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Qualitative evidence suggests that disability stigma is an important concept in the lived experiences of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there have been no studies in this population specifically evaluating internalized disability stigma. We sought to characterize variability in levels of internalized stigma and examine the applicability of the "why try" effect (reduced self-efficacy and life goal attainment as consequences of internalized stigma) to people living with chronic TBI.

Setting: Outpatient research laboratory.

Participants: Eighty-four adults with chronic TBI (1.4-22.6 years post-injury).

Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Main measures: Items were adapted from the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness questionnaire to capture disability-related internalized stigma and perceived discrimination. Primary outcome measures included societal participation and self-efficacy for TBI symptom management, which were assessed using validated instruments (Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective and TBI Self-Efficacy Scale, respectively).

Results: Raw and residualized (adjusted for perceived discrimination) internalized stigma scores were normally distributed. Individuals who reported internalized stigma at levels greater than predicted by their perceived discrimination tended to have more recent injuries (d = .60) and poorer processing speed (d = .50) compared to those reporting relatively lower internalized stigma. Higher internalized stigma was associated with lower self-efficacy, which, in turn, was associated with lower societal participation (indirect effect = - .26, 95% CI = [-.50, - .09]), independent of mental health symptoms.

Conclusions: Findings provide preliminary support for clinically meaningful variability in internalized stigma among people with TBI, and for the applicability of the "why try" model to this population. Further theory-informed research could stimulate the development of behavioral health interventions for reducing stigma internalization and its harmful effects on post-injury psychosocial functioning.

慢性创伤性脑损伤患者的内化残疾耻辱感
目的:定性证据表明,残疾耻辱感是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者生活经历中的一个重要概念。然而,在这一人群中还没有专门评估内化残疾耻辱感的研究。我们试图表征内化耻辱感水平的可变性,并检验“为什么要尝试”效应(内化耻辱感导致自我效能降低和生活目标实现降低)对慢性创伤性脑损伤患者的适用性。单位:门诊研究实验室。参与者:84名成人慢性TBI患者(损伤后1.4-22.6年)。设计:横断面观察性研究。主要测量方法:采用《精神疾病内化污名》问卷中的条目,捕捉残疾相关的内化污名和感知歧视。主要结果测量包括社会参与和TBI症状管理的自我效能,使用有效的工具进行评估(分别使用重组工具-目标参与评估和TBI自我效能量表)。结果:原始和残差(经感知歧视调整)内化污名得分呈正态分布。与报告内化耻辱程度相对较低的个体相比,报告内化耻辱程度高于其感知到的歧视预测的个体往往有更多的近期伤害(d = 0.60)和较差的处理速度(d = 0.50)。较高的内化污名与较低的自我效能感相关,而自我效能感又与较低的社会参与度相关(间接效应= - 0.26,95% CI =[-])。50, - 0.09]),与心理健康症状无关。结论:研究结果为TBI患者内化耻辱的临床意义变异性提供了初步支持,并为“为什么要尝试”模型在该人群中的适用性提供了初步支持。进一步的理论研究可以促进行为健康干预措施的发展,以减少耻辱内化及其对受伤后心理社会功能的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信