Mitigating patients' negative responses to health care asset sharing through explanatory information provision.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000445
Caroline Rothert-Schnell, Sebastian Böddeker, Gianfranco Walsh
{"title":"Mitigating patients' negative responses to health care asset sharing through explanatory information provision.","authors":"Caroline Rothert-Schnell, Sebastian Böddeker, Gianfranco Walsh","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing health care assets promises to enhance asset utilization, increase efficiency, and reduce costs, but this tactic also might risk adverse patient outcomes. Identifying potential mitigation strategies thus represents a pressing research need.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>This study investigates the effects of sharing a health care asset on patients' perceptions, as well as how providing explanatory information might mitigate the negative effects of such sharing on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Building on signaling theory and data gathered from a scenario-based experiment (n = 303 German participants), the authors perform regression analyses, in which trust in the physician and perceived risk represent mediators of the relationship between sharing a health care asset and patients' intentions to return. They also explore if physicians' explanatory information provision functions as a moderator.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Trust in the physician and perceived risk serially mediate the effect of sharing a health care asset on patients' intentions to return. Explanatory information provision can mitigate the negative effects of asset sharing on patients' trust in the physician.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Explanatory information provision is crucial for implementing shared asset use strategies in the health care sector, because it offers the potential to mitigate the negative effects of such uses on patient outcomes. Health care providers pursuing shared asset strategies should provide patients with clear information about the shared asset, to prevent adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"232-240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sharing health care assets promises to enhance asset utilization, increase efficiency, and reduce costs, but this tactic also might risk adverse patient outcomes. Identifying potential mitigation strategies thus represents a pressing research need.

Purposes: This study investigates the effects of sharing a health care asset on patients' perceptions, as well as how providing explanatory information might mitigate the negative effects of such sharing on patient outcomes.

Methodology/approach: Building on signaling theory and data gathered from a scenario-based experiment (n = 303 German participants), the authors perform regression analyses, in which trust in the physician and perceived risk represent mediators of the relationship between sharing a health care asset and patients' intentions to return. They also explore if physicians' explanatory information provision functions as a moderator.

Findings: Trust in the physician and perceived risk serially mediate the effect of sharing a health care asset on patients' intentions to return. Explanatory information provision can mitigate the negative effects of asset sharing on patients' trust in the physician.

Practice implications: Explanatory information provision is crucial for implementing shared asset use strategies in the health care sector, because it offers the potential to mitigate the negative effects of such uses on patient outcomes. Health care providers pursuing shared asset strategies should provide patients with clear information about the shared asset, to prevent adverse effects.

通过提供解释性信息,减轻患者对卫生保健资产共享的负面反应。
背景:共享医疗资产有望提高资产利用率、提高效率和降低成本,但这种策略也可能带来不良患者结果的风险。因此,确定潜在的缓解战略是一项迫切的研究需要。目的:本研究探讨了共享医疗资产对患者感知的影响,以及提供解释性信息如何减轻这种共享对患者结果的负面影响。方法/方法:基于信号理论和从基于场景的实验(n = 303名德国参与者)收集的数据,作者进行了回归分析,其中对医生的信任和感知风险代表了共享医疗保健资产与患者回归意愿之间关系的中介。他们还探讨了医生的解释性信息提供是否起到调节作用。研究结果:对医生的信任和感知风险依次介导了共享医疗资产对患者回归意愿的影响。提供解释性信息可以缓解资产共享对患者对医生信任的负面影响。实践影响:提供解释性信息对于在卫生保健部门实施共享资产使用战略至关重要,因为它有可能减轻此类使用对患者预后的负面影响。追求共享资产策略的卫生保健提供者应向患者提供有关共享资产的明确信息,以防止不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信