Long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve field stimulation in patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia: a cohort study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Johann Klein, Tareq A Juratli, Gabriele Schackert, Ilker Y Eyüpoglu, Majd A Alkhatib
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve field stimulation in patients with refractory trigeminal neuralgia: a cohort study.","authors":"Johann Klein, Tareq A Juratli, Gabriele Schackert, Ilker Y Eyüpoglu, Majd A Alkhatib","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.JNS242951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is a neuromodulatory surgical treatment used to treat severe refractory trigeminal neuralgia. However, most studies have had comparatively short follow-up periods. Thus, the authors performed a long-term analysis of patients who had received PNFS for trigeminal neuralgia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional database was searched for patients who had received PNFS from 2012 to 2017. Only patients with trigeminal neuralgia who received a permanent implant were included. The electronic medical records were reviewed, and patients were contacted for outpatient appointments or telephone interviews. Perceived treatment effectiveness was the primary outcome parameter. Additionally, revision surgeries, other invasive treatments after PNFS implantation, system explants, and the painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) score at the latest follow-up were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients (6 male and 9 female; median age 70 years, range 45-87 years) were included in the analysis, 7 with classic trigeminal neuralgia and 8 with secondary trigeminal neuralgia (7 due to multiple sclerosis, 1 due to an inoperable meningioma). The median symptom duration was 11.5 years (range 2.5-17 years) and the median follow-up duration was 93 months (range 30-126, IQR 66.5-107 months). Half the male patients still perceived treatment effectiveness at the latest follow-up assessment, but none of the female patients did. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test revealed a median time to failure of 2 years, with a median of 5.1 years in males and 1.5 years in females (p = 0.003). The median PD-Q score was 16 (range 0-27). There were 7 revision surgeries in 4 patients, and 4 patients underwent additional procedures after implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PNFS in trigeminal neuralgia is associated with a high rate of treatment failure in the long term, with females possibly experiencing worse results than males.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.JNS242951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is a neuromodulatory surgical treatment used to treat severe refractory trigeminal neuralgia. However, most studies have had comparatively short follow-up periods. Thus, the authors performed a long-term analysis of patients who had received PNFS for trigeminal neuralgia.

Methods: An institutional database was searched for patients who had received PNFS from 2012 to 2017. Only patients with trigeminal neuralgia who received a permanent implant were included. The electronic medical records were reviewed, and patients were contacted for outpatient appointments or telephone interviews. Perceived treatment effectiveness was the primary outcome parameter. Additionally, revision surgeries, other invasive treatments after PNFS implantation, system explants, and the painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) score at the latest follow-up were assessed.

Results: Fifteen patients (6 male and 9 female; median age 70 years, range 45-87 years) were included in the analysis, 7 with classic trigeminal neuralgia and 8 with secondary trigeminal neuralgia (7 due to multiple sclerosis, 1 due to an inoperable meningioma). The median symptom duration was 11.5 years (range 2.5-17 years) and the median follow-up duration was 93 months (range 30-126, IQR 66.5-107 months). Half the male patients still perceived treatment effectiveness at the latest follow-up assessment, but none of the female patients did. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test revealed a median time to failure of 2 years, with a median of 5.1 years in males and 1.5 years in females (p = 0.003). The median PD-Q score was 16 (range 0-27). There were 7 revision surgeries in 4 patients, and 4 patients underwent additional procedures after implantation.

Conclusions: PNFS in trigeminal neuralgia is associated with a high rate of treatment failure in the long term, with females possibly experiencing worse results than males.

周围神经野刺激治疗难治性三叉神经痛患者的长期疗效:一项队列研究。
目的:外周神经野刺激(PNFS)是一种用于治疗严重难治性三叉神经痛的神经调节手术治疗方法。然而,大多数研究的随访期相对较短。因此,作者对接受PNFS治疗三叉神经痛的患者进行了长期分析。方法:检索2012年至2017年接受PNFS治疗的机构数据库。只有接受永久性植入物的三叉神经痛患者被纳入研究。对电子病历进行了审查,并与患者进行了门诊预约或电话访谈。感知治疗效果是主要结局参数。此外,评估翻修手术、PNFS植入后的其他侵入性治疗、系统植入以及最新随访时的painDETECT问卷(PD-Q)评分。结果:15例患者(男6例,女9例;中位年龄70岁,45-87岁)纳入分析,7例为经典三叉神经痛,8例为继发性三叉神经痛(7例为多发性硬化症,1例为无法手术的脑膜瘤)。中位症状持续时间为11.5年(2.5-17年),中位随访时间为93个月(30-126个月,IQR为66.5-107个月)。在最近的随访评估中,有一半的男性患者仍然认为治疗有效,但没有女性患者这样认为。Kaplan-Meier分析和log-rank检验显示,到失败的中位时间为2年,其中男性为5.1年,女性为1.5年(p = 0.003)。PD-Q评分中位数为16(范围0-27)。4例患者进行了7次修复手术,4例患者在植入后进行了额外的手术。结论:三叉神经痛的PNFS与长期治疗失败率高相关,女性可能比男性经历更差的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信