Arts on prescription intervention for primary healthcare patients with poor mental health or social isolation: a mixed-method study.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anita Jensen, Anders Halling, Mirnabi Pirouzifard, Martin Lindström
{"title":"Arts on prescription intervention for primary healthcare patients with poor mental health or social isolation: a mixed-method study.","authors":"Anita Jensen, Anders Halling, Mirnabi Pirouzifard, Martin Lindström","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02866-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare providers are increasingly challenged in supporting patients with psychosocial needs. Arts on Prescription (AoP) has been shown to improve primary healthcare patients' mental health wellbeing. The aim of the current study is to understand the psychosocial effect of participating in an Arts on Prescription programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 112 primary healthcare patients from 18 primary healthcare centres in Scania with mental health diagnoses depression and anxiety or social isolation participated in a 10-week group-based arts programme, twice a week for 2 h. A questionnaire with the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS), the Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale (SHIS) (for baseline and follow-up) and 14 sociodemographic and self-rated health covariates were collected as baseline. We also conducted 28 semi-structured interviews. We analysed data using paired t-test and a general linear regression model for change in SWEMWBS and SHIS. Qualitative data was analysed using a thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired t-test showed highly significant results (p < 0.001) for increase in both SWEMWBS and SHIS. The general linear regression. models show that women and participants with poorer self-rated health (SRH), more contacts with the healthcare system, other referrals from the primary healthcare centre, and no previous arts and culture engagement displayed significantly stronger associations with increase in SWEMWBS but not SHIS. Qualitative results highlight use of other interventions and difficulties navigating the health system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support a proportionate universalism (scale and intensity proportionate to the degree of need) approach indicating that AoP programmes could be valuable additions to healthcare pathways enhancing wellbeing for vulnerable populations. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to small sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02866-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary healthcare providers are increasingly challenged in supporting patients with psychosocial needs. Arts on Prescription (AoP) has been shown to improve primary healthcare patients' mental health wellbeing. The aim of the current study is to understand the psychosocial effect of participating in an Arts on Prescription programme.

Methods: A total of 112 primary healthcare patients from 18 primary healthcare centres in Scania with mental health diagnoses depression and anxiety or social isolation participated in a 10-week group-based arts programme, twice a week for 2 h. A questionnaire with the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS), the Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale (SHIS) (for baseline and follow-up) and 14 sociodemographic and self-rated health covariates were collected as baseline. We also conducted 28 semi-structured interviews. We analysed data using paired t-test and a general linear regression model for change in SWEMWBS and SHIS. Qualitative data was analysed using a thematic approach.

Results: The paired t-test showed highly significant results (p < 0.001) for increase in both SWEMWBS and SHIS. The general linear regression. models show that women and participants with poorer self-rated health (SRH), more contacts with the healthcare system, other referrals from the primary healthcare centre, and no previous arts and culture engagement displayed significantly stronger associations with increase in SWEMWBS but not SHIS. Qualitative results highlight use of other interventions and difficulties navigating the health system.

Conclusions: Our findings support a proportionate universalism (scale and intensity proportionate to the degree of need) approach indicating that AoP programmes could be valuable additions to healthcare pathways enhancing wellbeing for vulnerable populations. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to small sample size.

心理健康状况不佳或社会孤立的初级保健患者的处方干预:一项混合方法研究。
背景:初级卫生保健提供者在支持有心理社会需求的患者方面面临越来越大的挑战。处方艺术(AoP)已被证明可以改善初级保健患者的心理健康。当前研究的目的是了解参加处方艺术项目的心理社会影响。方法:来自Scania 18个初级卫生保健中心的112名心理健康诊断为抑郁、焦虑或社会孤立的初级卫生保健患者参加了为期10周的以小组为基础的艺术项目,每周2次,每次2小时。收集了一份问卷,其中包括短华威爱丁堡心理健康量表(SWEMWBS)、健康指标量表(SHIS)(用于基线和随访)以及14个社会人口学和自评健康协变量作为基线。我们还进行了28次半结构化访谈。我们使用配对t检验和一般线性回归模型分析SWEMWBS和SHIS的变化。定性数据采用专题方法进行分析。结果:配对t检验显示了高度显著的结果(p结论:我们的研究结果支持比例普遍性(规模和强度与需求程度成正比)的方法,表明AoP计划可以成为提高弱势群体福祉的医疗保健途径的有价值的补充。由于样本量小,研究结果应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信