Santiago Callegari, Gaëlle Romain, Abhinav Aggarwal, Jacob Cleman, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado
{"title":"Diabetes Status and Long-Term Mortality and Major Amputation Outcomes Following Revascularization in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.","authors":"Santiago Callegari, Gaëlle Romain, Abhinav Aggarwal, Jacob Cleman, Kim G Smolderen, Carlos Mena-Hurtado","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects over 60% of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The association between DM in outcomes after lower-extremity bypass (LEB) or peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) remains unclear. Our study aims to assess the association between DM and 5-year all-cause mortality and major amputation following LEB vs. PVI for CLTI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CLTI undergoing LEB or PVI between 2014-2019 were studied in the VQI registry and stratified according to DM status. Outcomes were derived from linked Medicare claims data. Propensity score 1:1 matching between PVI and LEB cohort was used. Cumulative incidence of mortality and hazard ratio were assessed with a Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model, respectively. To account for the competing risk of death, major amputation was evaluated with Aalen-Johansen and Fine-Gray model for cumulative incidence and sub-hazard ratio (sHR), respectively. The interaction between DM and PVI vs LEB was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,218 patients were included (70.7 ± 10.7 years old, 30.6% female), 62.3% had DM. . The 5-year cumulative incidence of death was lower in LEB vs PVI regardless of DM status (LEB vs. PVI without DM: P=0.005, and with DM: P = 0.004). The 5-year risk of death after LEB was 26% less than after PVI, regardless of DM status (P interaction = 0.490). There was no association between 5-year mortality risk and DM status (HR 1.16 95% CI 0.99-1.34, P = 0.060). The cumulative incidence of major amputation at 5 years did not differ in LEB vs. PVI regardless of DM status (LEB vs. PVI without DM cohort: P = 0.955, and with DM cohort: P=0.955). The 5-year risk of major amputation was not associated with the type of revascularization (sHR 0.79 95% CI 0.57-1.08, P=0.140). Major amputation was twice higher in patients with DM than in those without DM (sHR 1.98 95% CI 1.55-2.54, P< 0.001), regardless of treatment cohort (P interaction = 0.869). Similar results were seen regardless of insulin-dependent status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DM affects the majority of patients with CLTI. Regardless of DM status, mortality at 5 years was lower among patients undergoing LEB. There was no difference in major amputation in LEB vs PVI and mortality or major amputation at 5 years, but patients with DM vs. no DM had a higher risk of major amputation. Shared decision-making, team-based care, and integrated care offerings are needed within the context of a revascularization pathway for patients with DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects over 60% of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The association between DM in outcomes after lower-extremity bypass (LEB) or peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) remains unclear. Our study aims to assess the association between DM and 5-year all-cause mortality and major amputation following LEB vs. PVI for CLTI.
Methods: Patients with CLTI undergoing LEB or PVI between 2014-2019 were studied in the VQI registry and stratified according to DM status. Outcomes were derived from linked Medicare claims data. Propensity score 1:1 matching between PVI and LEB cohort was used. Cumulative incidence of mortality and hazard ratio were assessed with a Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model, respectively. To account for the competing risk of death, major amputation was evaluated with Aalen-Johansen and Fine-Gray model for cumulative incidence and sub-hazard ratio (sHR), respectively. The interaction between DM and PVI vs LEB was tested.
Results: Of 4,218 patients were included (70.7 ± 10.7 years old, 30.6% female), 62.3% had DM. . The 5-year cumulative incidence of death was lower in LEB vs PVI regardless of DM status (LEB vs. PVI without DM: P=0.005, and with DM: P = 0.004). The 5-year risk of death after LEB was 26% less than after PVI, regardless of DM status (P interaction = 0.490). There was no association between 5-year mortality risk and DM status (HR 1.16 95% CI 0.99-1.34, P = 0.060). The cumulative incidence of major amputation at 5 years did not differ in LEB vs. PVI regardless of DM status (LEB vs. PVI without DM cohort: P = 0.955, and with DM cohort: P=0.955). The 5-year risk of major amputation was not associated with the type of revascularization (sHR 0.79 95% CI 0.57-1.08, P=0.140). Major amputation was twice higher in patients with DM than in those without DM (sHR 1.98 95% CI 1.55-2.54, P< 0.001), regardless of treatment cohort (P interaction = 0.869). Similar results were seen regardless of insulin-dependent status.
Conclusion: DM affects the majority of patients with CLTI. Regardless of DM status, mortality at 5 years was lower among patients undergoing LEB. There was no difference in major amputation in LEB vs PVI and mortality or major amputation at 5 years, but patients with DM vs. no DM had a higher risk of major amputation. Shared decision-making, team-based care, and integrated care offerings are needed within the context of a revascularization pathway for patients with DM.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.