Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nicole R Fowler, Dustin B Hammers, Anthony J Perkins, Diana Summanwar, Anna Higbie, Kristen Swartzell, Jared R Brosch, Deanna R Willis
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care.","authors":"Nicole R Fowler, Dustin B Hammers, Anthony J Perkins, Diana Summanwar, Anna Higbie, Kristen Swartzell, Jared R Brosch, Deanna R Willis","doi":"10.1370/afm.240293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a digital cognitive assessment (DCA) for Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) screening into primary care. We also assessed the prevalence of positive screens and measured diagnostic and care outcomes after a positive DCA result.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-arm pragmatic clinical demonstration project in 7 diverse primary care clinics to test implementation of the Linus Health Core Cognitive Evaluation and Digital Clock and Recall DCAs (Linus Health, Inc). Eligible patients were aged ≥65 years. Patients were ineligible if unable to see or hear, not English or Spanish speaking, or if they had a DCA in the past 12 months with an unimpaired or impaired result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 16,708 eligible encounters during the 12-month study period (June 2022-May 2023). A total of 1,808 DCAs (10.8%) were completed by 1,722 unique patients; 3,727 (22.3%) declined, and at 9,232 encounters (55.3%) the physicians declined to have the patient complete the DCA or the encounter was deemed out of scope. Among those who completed DCAs, results for 762 (44.3%) were categorized as unimpaired, 628 (36.5%) borderline, 236 (13.7%) impaired, and 96 (5.6%) inconclusive. Among the 236 patients who were categorized as impaired, 2.1% received a new diagnosis of ADRD, and 5.1% received a new diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment within 90 days after the DCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-half of all patients scored impaired or borderline for cognitive impairment. Digital cognitive assessments can be implemented in primary care, have utility for early detection, and could represent the first step in identification of patients who could benefit from ADRD disease-modifying therapeutics, care management, or other interventions to improve patient and family caregiver outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"191-198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a digital cognitive assessment (DCA) for Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) screening into primary care. We also assessed the prevalence of positive screens and measured diagnostic and care outcomes after a positive DCA result.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm pragmatic clinical demonstration project in 7 diverse primary care clinics to test implementation of the Linus Health Core Cognitive Evaluation and Digital Clock and Recall DCAs (Linus Health, Inc). Eligible patients were aged ≥65 years. Patients were ineligible if unable to see or hear, not English or Spanish speaking, or if they had a DCA in the past 12 months with an unimpaired or impaired result.

Results: There were 16,708 eligible encounters during the 12-month study period (June 2022-May 2023). A total of 1,808 DCAs (10.8%) were completed by 1,722 unique patients; 3,727 (22.3%) declined, and at 9,232 encounters (55.3%) the physicians declined to have the patient complete the DCA or the encounter was deemed out of scope. Among those who completed DCAs, results for 762 (44.3%) were categorized as unimpaired, 628 (36.5%) borderline, 236 (13.7%) impaired, and 96 (5.6%) inconclusive. Among the 236 patients who were categorized as impaired, 2.1% received a new diagnosis of ADRD, and 5.1% received a new diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment within 90 days after the DCA.

Conclusions: One-half of all patients scored impaired or borderline for cognitive impairment. Digital cognitive assessments can be implemented in primary care, have utility for early detection, and could represent the first step in identification of patients who could benefit from ADRD disease-modifying therapeutics, care management, or other interventions to improve patient and family caregiver outcomes.

在初级保健中实施阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆的数字认知评估的可行性和可接受性。
目的:我们评估了在初级保健中实施阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)筛查的数字认知评估(DCA)的可行性和可接受性。我们还评估了筛查阳性的患病率,并测量了DCA阳性结果后的诊断和护理结果。方法:我们在7个不同的初级保健诊所进行了单臂实用临床示范项目,以测试Linus Health核心认知评估和数字时钟和回忆dca (Linus Health, Inc)的实施情况。符合条件的患者年龄≥65岁。如果患者无法看到或听到,不会说英语或西班牙语,或者如果他们在过去12个月内进行过DCA,结果未受损或受损,则不符合资格。结果:在12个月的研究期间(2022年6月至2023年5月),有16,708例符合条件的接触。1722例特殊患者共完成了1808例dca (10.8%);3727名(22.3%)医生拒绝,9232名(55.3%)医生拒绝让患者完成DCA或认为该次会面超出了范围。在完成dca的患者中,762例(44.3%)的结果被归类为未受损,628例(36.5%)为边缘,236例(13.7%)受损,96例(5.6%)不确定。在236例受损患者中,2.1%在DCA后90天内新诊断为ADRD, 5.1%在DCA后90天内新诊断为轻度认知障碍。结论:半数患者的认知障碍评分为受损或边缘。数字认知评估可以在初级保健中实施,对早期发现有实用价值,并且可以代表识别可以从ADRD疾病改善治疗、护理管理或其他干预措施中受益的患者的第一步,以改善患者和家庭照顾者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信