Thomas G Knight, Caitlin Hensel, Kris Blackley, Mellisa Wheeler, Hughes R Warden, Wendy Jo Turan, Jaynie Moroe, Seungjean Chai, Donna Feild, Ruben Mesa, Derek Raghavan
{"title":"The Financial Toxicity Tumor Board: 5-Year Update on Practice and a Guide to Implementation.","authors":"Thomas G Knight, Caitlin Hensel, Kris Blackley, Mellisa Wheeler, Hughes R Warden, Wendy Jo Turan, Jaynie Moroe, Seungjean Chai, Donna Feild, Ruben Mesa, Derek Raghavan","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Financial toxicity has been increasingly recognized as a major driver of negative outcomes for patients with cancer, with prior interventions focused primarily on patient-level support. The Financial Toxicity Tumor Board (FTTB), established in 2019, is the first institutional-level intervention addressing these challenges. We report on its function and outcomes over 5 years of operation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing on expertise from across the cancer center, the FTTB was designed to operate similarly to traditional, disease-focused multidisciplinary tumor boards but with a focus on issues related to financial distress. Over time, this system-level intervention has evolved, with major changes including a shift to disease-focused meetings and the developing refinement of process to an Archetype system-categorizing cases as Immediate Assistance Required, System-Level Issue Identified, or Policy/Legislative Issue Identified-which has enhanced its function and effectiveness. In tandem, the pharmacy-based patient assistance program (PAP) arm of the FTTB, formerly focused only on drug approvals, has expanded to address routine financial challenges associated with broader cancer care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past 5 years, >70 cases have been presented to the tumor board, with most resulting in immediate solutions for the individual patient as well as numerous systemic changes. The PAP arm of the FTTB has provided 9,321 patients with copay assistance, totalling >$10,316,695. Furthermore, 16,495 patients have received free medications, amounting to $392,895,101 in patient benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The success of the FTTB-both through the tumor board and PAP arms-demonstrates that focused systemic intervention can lead to sustained, substantial improvements in financial toxicity. This model should be further developed as a new standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 5","pages":"164-168"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Financial toxicity has been increasingly recognized as a major driver of negative outcomes for patients with cancer, with prior interventions focused primarily on patient-level support. The Financial Toxicity Tumor Board (FTTB), established in 2019, is the first institutional-level intervention addressing these challenges. We report on its function and outcomes over 5 years of operation.
Methods: Drawing on expertise from across the cancer center, the FTTB was designed to operate similarly to traditional, disease-focused multidisciplinary tumor boards but with a focus on issues related to financial distress. Over time, this system-level intervention has evolved, with major changes including a shift to disease-focused meetings and the developing refinement of process to an Archetype system-categorizing cases as Immediate Assistance Required, System-Level Issue Identified, or Policy/Legislative Issue Identified-which has enhanced its function and effectiveness. In tandem, the pharmacy-based patient assistance program (PAP) arm of the FTTB, formerly focused only on drug approvals, has expanded to address routine financial challenges associated with broader cancer care.
Results: Over the past 5 years, >70 cases have been presented to the tumor board, with most resulting in immediate solutions for the individual patient as well as numerous systemic changes. The PAP arm of the FTTB has provided 9,321 patients with copay assistance, totalling >$10,316,695. Furthermore, 16,495 patients have received free medications, amounting to $392,895,101 in patient benefits.
Conclusions: The success of the FTTB-both through the tumor board and PAP arms-demonstrates that focused systemic intervention can lead to sustained, substantial improvements in financial toxicity. This model should be further developed as a new standard of care.
期刊介绍:
JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care.
Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship.
JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.