Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan as Second-Line Therapy.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Control Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1177/10732748251333040
Yu-Shin Hung, Tai-Jan Chiu, Yen-Yang Chen, Wen-Chi Chou
{"title":"Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan as Second-Line Therapy.","authors":"Yu-Shin Hung, Tai-Jan Chiu, Yen-Yang Chen, Wen-Chi Chou","doi":"10.1177/10732748251333040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionNanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is an established second-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We previously developed a prognostic model (CGMH nomogram) to predict overall survival (OS) in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy before the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV era. Herein, we aimed to validate the CGMH nomogram in a real-world cohort treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, the current standard second-line treatment for metastatic PDAC.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 148 patients with metastatic PDAC treated with second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was analyzed. Prognostic scores were assigned using the CGMH nomogram, with patients stratified into tertiles as good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups. Predictive performance was assessed using the concordance index (c-index) and calibration plots.ResultsOur cohort had a median OS of 6.1 months. Patients in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups had median OS of 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-10.7), 5.7 (95% CI, 5.3-6.3), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.8-5.2) months, respectively. Compared with the good group, intermediate and poor groups had hazard ratios of 1.99 (95% CI, 1.29-3.07, <i>P</i> = .002) and 3.18 (95% CI, 1.87-5.40, <i>P</i> < .001), respectively. The nomogram demonstrated strong predictive ability, with c-indices of 0.73 and 0.70 for 6- and 12-month OS predictions, respectively. Calibration plots displayed excellent agreement between predicted and observed survival.ConclusionThe CGMH nomogram reliably predicted survival outcomes in nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV-treated patients with metastatic PDAC, and validation supported its use in clinical decision-making and personalized treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251333040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251333040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionNanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is an established second-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We previously developed a prognostic model (CGMH nomogram) to predict overall survival (OS) in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy before the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV era. Herein, we aimed to validate the CGMH nomogram in a real-world cohort treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, the current standard second-line treatment for metastatic PDAC.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 148 patients with metastatic PDAC treated with second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was analyzed. Prognostic scores were assigned using the CGMH nomogram, with patients stratified into tertiles as good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups. Predictive performance was assessed using the concordance index (c-index) and calibration plots.ResultsOur cohort had a median OS of 6.1 months. Patients in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups had median OS of 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-10.7), 5.7 (95% CI, 5.3-6.3), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.8-5.2) months, respectively. Compared with the good group, intermediate and poor groups had hazard ratios of 1.99 (95% CI, 1.29-3.07, P = .002) and 3.18 (95% CI, 1.87-5.40, P < .001), respectively. The nomogram demonstrated strong predictive ability, with c-indices of 0.73 and 0.70 for 6- and 12-month OS predictions, respectively. Calibration plots displayed excellent agreement between predicted and observed survival.ConclusionThe CGMH nomogram reliably predicted survival outcomes in nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV-treated patients with metastatic PDAC, and validation supported its use in clinical decision-making and personalized treatment planning.

用纳米脂质体伊立替康作为二线治疗的转移性胰腺癌患者的预后图验证。
纳米脂体伊立替康(nal-IRI)联合5-氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸蛋白(5-FU/LV)是转移性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的二线治疗方法。我们之前开发了一种预后模型(CGMH nomogram)来预测在nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV时代之前接受二线化疗的患者的总生存期(OS)。在这里,我们的目的是在一个现实世界的队列中验证CGMH图,该队列接受nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV治疗,这是目前转移性PDAC的标准二线治疗。方法对148例接受二线nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV治疗的转移性PDAC患者进行回顾性分析。预后评分使用CGMH图进行分配,将患者分为良好、中等和不良预后组。使用一致性指数(c-index)和校准图评估预测性能。结果我们的队列中位生存期为6.1个月。预后良好、中等和不良组患者的中位OS分别为8.7个月(95%可信区间[CI], 6.7-10.7)、5.7个月(95% CI, 5.3-6.3)和4.0个月(95% CI, 2.8-5.2)。与良好组相比,中度组和不良组的危险比分别为1.99 (95% CI, 1.29 ~ 3.07, P = 0.002)和3.18 (95% CI, 1.87 ~ 5.40, P < 0.001)。nomogram显示出较强的预测能力,预测6个月和12个月OS的c指数分别为0.73和0.70。校正图显示预测生存期和观察生存期非常吻合。结论CGMH图可靠地预测了nal-IRI + 5-FU/ lv治疗的转移性PDAC患者的生存结果,验证支持其在临床决策和个性化治疗计划中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信