Analyzing outcomes of the adjustable transobturator male system for post-prostatectomy incontinence and its relationship with detrusor overactivity and radiotherapy with the help of urodynamics.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Samuel Farag, Salima Ismail, Joanie Pelletier, Le Mai Tu
{"title":"Analyzing outcomes of the adjustable transobturator male system for post-prostatectomy incontinence and its relationship with detrusor overactivity and radiotherapy with the help of urodynamics.","authors":"Samuel Farag, Salima Ismail, Joanie Pelletier, Le Mai Tu","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) has recently garnered attention for its surgical simplicity and suitability for mild post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of patients who received ATOMS, including subgroup analyses of individuals with overactive bladder (OAB) or previous radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 104 patients who received ATOMS. To classify mild, moderate, and severe incontinence, preoperative severity was defined as <2 pads per day (PPD), 2-4 PPD, and >4 PPD, based on the 24-hour pad count and/or <200 g, 200-400 g, and >400 g, based on the 24-hour pad-test (24h-PT). Postoperative \"dry\" status referred to ≤1 pad/day, while \"improved\" or \"very much improved\" indicated a pad reduction of ≥50% or ≥75%, respectively. Patients who reported \"much better\" or \"very much better\" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence (PGI-I) questionnaire were considered \"satisfied.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients were excluded for insufficient followup, leaving 91 patients (mean age 70 years, mean followup 42 months). Most were classified as moderately (44%) or severely (55%) incontinent, with a median of four pads/day and a mean 24-hour pad test of 351 g preoperatively. At final followup, the median pad count was 0.5; 89% improved overall, 58% became dry, and 91% were satisfied. Complications occurred in 27% (five grade III). Patients with prior radiotherapy (n=29) exhibited lower dryness (55% vs. 79%) and improvement (83% vs. 92%), alongside more adjustments and higher total instilled volume. There were no other significant subgroup differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ATOMS appears to be a safe and effective device for PPI, including for moderate to severe incontinence, although radiotherapy may affect efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"262-268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) has recently garnered attention for its surgical simplicity and suitability for mild post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of patients who received ATOMS, including subgroup analyses of individuals with overactive bladder (OAB) or previous radiotherapy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 104 patients who received ATOMS. To classify mild, moderate, and severe incontinence, preoperative severity was defined as <2 pads per day (PPD), 2-4 PPD, and >4 PPD, based on the 24-hour pad count and/or <200 g, 200-400 g, and >400 g, based on the 24-hour pad-test (24h-PT). Postoperative "dry" status referred to ≤1 pad/day, while "improved" or "very much improved" indicated a pad reduction of ≥50% or ≥75%, respectively. Patients who reported "much better" or "very much better" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement-Incontinence (PGI-I) questionnaire were considered "satisfied."

Results: Thirteen patients were excluded for insufficient followup, leaving 91 patients (mean age 70 years, mean followup 42 months). Most were classified as moderately (44%) or severely (55%) incontinent, with a median of four pads/day and a mean 24-hour pad test of 351 g preoperatively. At final followup, the median pad count was 0.5; 89% improved overall, 58% became dry, and 91% were satisfied. Complications occurred in 27% (five grade III). Patients with prior radiotherapy (n=29) exhibited lower dryness (55% vs. 79%) and improvement (83% vs. 92%), alongside more adjustments and higher total instilled volume. There were no other significant subgroup differences.

Conclusions: ATOMS appears to be a safe and effective device for PPI, including for moderate to severe incontinence, although radiotherapy may affect efficacy.

利用尿动力学分析可调节式男性通气系统(ATOMS)治疗前列腺切除术后尿失禁的效果及其与逼尿肌过度活动和放疗的关系。
导读:可调节的男性透气器系统(ATOMS)最近因其手术简便和适用于轻度前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPI)而引起了人们的关注。这项回顾性研究调查了接受ATOMS治疗的患者的预后,包括对膀胱过动症(OAB)患者或既往放疗患者的亚组分析。方法:对104例接受ATOMS治疗的患者进行回顾性队列研究。为了区分轻度、中度和重度尿失禁,根据24小时尿垫计数和/或24小时尿垫试验(24h-PT),术前严重程度定义为4ppd。术后“干燥”状态指≤1个垫/天,而“改善”或“非常改善”分别表示垫减少≥50%或≥75%。在患者总体印象改善-尿失禁(PGI-I)问卷中报告“好得多”或“非常好”的患者被认为是“满意”。结果:13例患者因随访不足被排除,剩余91例患者(平均年龄70岁,平均随访42个月)。大多数患者被分类为中度(44%)或重度(55%)尿失禁,术前平均4个尿垫/天,平均24小时尿垫试验为351 g。在最后随访时,中位垫计数为0.5;89%整体改善,58%变干,91%满意。并发症发生率为27%(5例III级)。先前放疗的患者(n=29)表现出较低的干燥度(55%对79%)和改善(83%对92%),以及更多的调整和更高的总灌注体积。其他亚组无显著差异。结论:ATOMS似乎是一种安全有效的PPI装置,包括中度至重度尿失禁,尽管放疗可能影响疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信