Trends in first-line glucose-lowering medication use among US adults with type 2 diabetes from 2019 to 2023.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Duy Do, Tiffany Lee, Samuel Peasah, Angela Inneh, Urvashi Patel, Chester Good
{"title":"Trends in first-line glucose-lowering medication use among US adults with type 2 diabetes from 2019 to 2023.","authors":"Duy Do, Tiffany Lee, Samuel Peasah, Angela Inneh, Urvashi Patel, Chester Good","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.5.520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of newer classes of glucose-lowering therapies has dramatically altered the diabetes therapeutic landscape. However, little is known about trends in the use of first-line glucose-lowering therapies over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe trends in the use of first-line glucose-lowering therapies from 2019 to 2023 among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and changes over time in the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients initiating these therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study identified patients aged 18 years and older from the Komodo Healthcare Map database who filled any glucose-lowering medication between January 2019 and May 2023. The prevalence of first-line glucose-lowering therapy use among patients with T2D was calculated in each month. Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used to compare patients' demographic and clinical characteristics such as cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease by type of first-line glucose-lowering medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort of 964,914 patients was predominantly made up of female patients (68%) and had a mean age of 54 (SD = 13). The majority of patients initiated metformin before 2022 (74%-83%), followed by insulin (6%-11%), sulfonylureas (3%-7%), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) (2%-5%), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2is) (1%-4%), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (1%-3%). From January 2022 to May 2023, first-line use of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is increased from 6% and 4% to 18% and 7%, respectively. In contrast, first-line use of metformin, sulfonylureas, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors declined from 76%, 4%, and 2% to 64%, 2%, and 1% over the same period, respectively. Relative to 2019-2021, first-line GLP-1RA users in 2022-2023 were likely to be younger, female, and covered by Medicaid and to have fewer comorbidities as determined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index. In contrast, first-line SGLT2i users were more likely to be older and to have more comorbidities over the same period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows a significant shift in the use of first-line glucose-lowering therapies from metformin to GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is. The proportion of first-line GLP-1RA and SGLT2i users with cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease has increased significantly over time, aligning with guidelines from the American Diabetes Association. Further studies are merited to evaluate the cost-benefit implications of this shift in first-line glucose-lowering use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 5","pages":"520-526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.5.520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of newer classes of glucose-lowering therapies has dramatically altered the diabetes therapeutic landscape. However, little is known about trends in the use of first-line glucose-lowering therapies over time.

Objective: To describe trends in the use of first-line glucose-lowering therapies from 2019 to 2023 among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and changes over time in the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients initiating these therapies.

Methods: This retrospective study identified patients aged 18 years and older from the Komodo Healthcare Map database who filled any glucose-lowering medication between January 2019 and May 2023. The prevalence of first-line glucose-lowering therapy use among patients with T2D was calculated in each month. Pearson χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used to compare patients' demographic and clinical characteristics such as cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease by type of first-line glucose-lowering medication.

Results: The study cohort of 964,914 patients was predominantly made up of female patients (68%) and had a mean age of 54 (SD = 13). The majority of patients initiated metformin before 2022 (74%-83%), followed by insulin (6%-11%), sulfonylureas (3%-7%), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) (2%-5%), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2is) (1%-4%), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (1%-3%). From January 2022 to May 2023, first-line use of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is increased from 6% and 4% to 18% and 7%, respectively. In contrast, first-line use of metformin, sulfonylureas, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors declined from 76%, 4%, and 2% to 64%, 2%, and 1% over the same period, respectively. Relative to 2019-2021, first-line GLP-1RA users in 2022-2023 were likely to be younger, female, and covered by Medicaid and to have fewer comorbidities as determined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index. In contrast, first-line SGLT2i users were more likely to be older and to have more comorbidities over the same period.

Conclusions: This study shows a significant shift in the use of first-line glucose-lowering therapies from metformin to GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is. The proportion of first-line GLP-1RA and SGLT2i users with cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease has increased significantly over time, aligning with guidelines from the American Diabetes Association. Further studies are merited to evaluate the cost-benefit implications of this shift in first-line glucose-lowering use.

2019年至2023年美国成人2型糖尿病患者一线降糖药物使用趋势
背景:新型降糖疗法的引入极大地改变了糖尿病治疗领域。然而,随着时间的推移,人们对一线降糖治疗的使用趋势知之甚少。目的:描述2019年至2023年2型糖尿病(T2D)患者使用一线降糖治疗的趋势,以及开始这些治疗的患者的人口统计学和临床特征随时间的变化。方法:本回顾性研究从Komodo医疗地图数据库中确定了在2019年1月至2023年5月期间服用任何降血糖药物的18岁及以上患者。每月计算t2dm患者使用一线降糖治疗的流行率。采用Pearson χ2和Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验比较患者的人口学特征和临床特征,如心血管疾病、心力衰竭或慢性肾脏疾病的一线降糖药物类型。结果:964,914例患者的研究队列以女性患者为主(68%),平均年龄为54岁(SD = 13)。大多数患者在2022年前开始使用二甲双胍(74%-83%),其次是胰岛素(6%-11%)、磺脲类药物(3%-7%)、胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)(2%-5%)、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)(1%-4%)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(1%-3%)。从2022年1月到2023年5月,GLP-1RAs和SGLT2is的一线使用分别从6%和4%增加到18%和7%。相比之下,同期一线使用二甲双胍、磺脲类药物和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂的比例分别从76%、4%和2%下降到64%、2%和1%。相对于2019-2021年,2022-2023年一线GLP-1RA使用者可能更年轻,女性,并且由Charlson合并症指数确定,并且有更少的合并症。相比之下,一线SGLT2i使用者更可能年龄更大,在同一时期有更多的合并症。结论:该研究显示一线降糖治疗的使用发生了重大转变,从二甲双胍转向GLP-1RAs和SGLT2is。与美国糖尿病协会的指南一致,一线GLP-1RA和SGLT2i使用者中心血管疾病、心力衰竭或慢性肾脏疾病的比例随着时间的推移显著增加。需要进一步的研究来评估这种转变对一线降糖使用的成本效益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信