Predictive models for assessing the risk of brain aneurysm rupture.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elena Sagues, Andres Gudino, Carlos Dier, Navami Shenoy, Diego Ojeda, Linder Wendt, Samantha Saenz Hinojosa, Emily Garces, Ivonne Salinas, Connor Aamot, Mario Zanaty, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, David Hasan, Edgar A Samaniego
{"title":"Predictive models for assessing the risk of brain aneurysm rupture.","authors":"Elena Sagues, Andres Gudino, Carlos Dier, Navami Shenoy, Diego Ojeda, Linder Wendt, Samantha Saenz Hinojosa, Emily Garces, Ivonne Salinas, Connor Aamot, Mario Zanaty, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, David Hasan, Edgar A Samaniego","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.JNS241772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Increased contrast enhancement of the aneurysm wall may indicate aneurysm instability. The authors tested different predictive models of aneurysm instability on a cohort of patients imaged with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with intracranial aneurysms were prospectively scanned with HR-MRI. Aneurysm instability was defined as rupture or symptomatic status at presentation. Magnetic resonance images were analyzed, and 3D enhancement maps were generated to analyze aneurysm wall enhancement. Additionally, radiomics features were extracted from the aneurysm wall. Four different predictive models combining clinical patient information, morphological aneurysm metrics, wall enhancement, and radiomics data were created to compare their performance in predicting symptomatic aneurysm presentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 129 intracranial aneurysms were included, with 34 (26%) being ruptured or symptomatic at presentation. The clinical model utilizing clinical variables and based on the Population, Hypertension, Age, Size of aneurysm, Earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage of another aneurysm, and Site of aneurysm (PHASES) score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62 (70% accuracy, 44% sensitivity, and 79% specificity) in detecting symptomatic aneurysms. The combined model with the PHASES score and morphological aneurysm information (size ratio) improved the AUC to 0.79 (73% accuracy, 77% sensitivity, and 72% specificity). Adding aneurysm wall enhancement metrics further enhanced the model's performance, raising the AUC to 0.82 (81% accuracy, 65% sensitivity, and 86% specificity). The best performing model achieved an AUC to 0.87 (76% accuracy, 88% sensitivity, and 72% specificity) and included age and radiomic data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The triage process for aneurysms is highly personalized and can benefit from incorporating clinical data, detailed morphological metrics of the aneurysm, and sophisticated analyses of aneurysm wall enhancement such as radiomics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.JNS241772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Increased contrast enhancement of the aneurysm wall may indicate aneurysm instability. The authors tested different predictive models of aneurysm instability on a cohort of patients imaged with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI).

Methods: Patients with intracranial aneurysms were prospectively scanned with HR-MRI. Aneurysm instability was defined as rupture or symptomatic status at presentation. Magnetic resonance images were analyzed, and 3D enhancement maps were generated to analyze aneurysm wall enhancement. Additionally, radiomics features were extracted from the aneurysm wall. Four different predictive models combining clinical patient information, morphological aneurysm metrics, wall enhancement, and radiomics data were created to compare their performance in predicting symptomatic aneurysm presentation.

Results: A total of 129 intracranial aneurysms were included, with 34 (26%) being ruptured or symptomatic at presentation. The clinical model utilizing clinical variables and based on the Population, Hypertension, Age, Size of aneurysm, Earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage of another aneurysm, and Site of aneurysm (PHASES) score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62 (70% accuracy, 44% sensitivity, and 79% specificity) in detecting symptomatic aneurysms. The combined model with the PHASES score and morphological aneurysm information (size ratio) improved the AUC to 0.79 (73% accuracy, 77% sensitivity, and 72% specificity). Adding aneurysm wall enhancement metrics further enhanced the model's performance, raising the AUC to 0.82 (81% accuracy, 65% sensitivity, and 86% specificity). The best performing model achieved an AUC to 0.87 (76% accuracy, 88% sensitivity, and 72% specificity) and included age and radiomic data.

Conclusions: The triage process for aneurysms is highly personalized and can benefit from incorporating clinical data, detailed morphological metrics of the aneurysm, and sophisticated analyses of aneurysm wall enhancement such as radiomics.

评估脑动脉瘤破裂风险的预测模型。
目的:动脉瘤壁造影增强可能提示动脉瘤不稳定。作者在一组高分辨率磁共振成像(HR-MRI)患者身上测试了不同的动脉瘤不稳定性预测模型。方法:对颅内动脉瘤患者进行HR-MRI前瞻性扫描。动脉瘤不稳定被定义为破裂或出现症状。对磁共振图像进行分析,生成三维增强图,分析动脉瘤壁增强。此外,从动脉瘤壁提取放射组学特征。结合临床患者信息、动脉瘤形态学指标、壁增强和放射组学数据,建立了四种不同的预测模型,比较它们在预测症状性动脉瘤表现方面的表现。结果:共纳入129例颅内动脉瘤,其中34例(26%)出现破裂或有症状。该临床模型利用临床变量,基于人群、高血压、年龄、动脉瘤大小、早期蛛网膜下腔出血及动脉瘤部位(期)评分,检测有症状的动脉瘤的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.62(准确率70%,敏感性44%,特异性79%)。结合phase评分和动脉瘤形态信息(尺寸比)的联合模型将AUC提高到0.79(准确率为73%,灵敏度为77%,特异性为72%)。添加动脉瘤壁增强指标进一步提高了模型的性能,将AUC提高到0.82(准确率81%,灵敏度65%,特异性86%)。最佳模型的AUC为0.87(准确率76%,灵敏度88%,特异性72%),包括年龄和放射学数据。结论:动脉瘤的分诊过程是高度个性化的,可以从结合临床数据、动脉瘤的详细形态学指标和复杂的动脉瘤壁增强分析(如放射组学)中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信