{"title":"Cranial kinematics and prey-type effects in <i>Amia ocellicauda</i> feeding strikes.","authors":"Katrina R Whitlow, Callum F Ross, Mark W Westneat","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.2542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variability in the biomechanics and kinematics of prey capture in vertebrates has been studied extensively, with evidence of multiple strategies for successful feeding in many taxa. Early research into suction-feeding strikes in fishes hypothesized that fish utilize a set of pre-programmed strike kinematics that cannot be altered once initiated. However, more recent evidence has demonstrated that teleost fishes not only deploy unique strike kinematics for different prey types, but they also alter their kinematics in response to a prey item attempting to escape. It has not yet been explicitly investigated whether non-teleost actinopterygians can also modulate the strike in response to different prey types. Here, we examined the kinematics of suction strikes in bowfin, <i>Amia ocellicauda</i>, a holostean fish most closely related to gars. We recorded <i>Amia</i> feeding on both feeder fish and worms, two types of live prey differing in evasiveness, using X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology. We found significant prey-type effects on the magnitude, timing and velocity of jaw opening, hyoid arch depression and pectoral girdle motions. These prey-type effects demonstrate that the ability to modulate feeding strikes evolved early in actinopterygian fishes and is possibly the ancestral state for jawed vertebrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"292 2045","pages":"20242542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2542","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Variability in the biomechanics and kinematics of prey capture in vertebrates has been studied extensively, with evidence of multiple strategies for successful feeding in many taxa. Early research into suction-feeding strikes in fishes hypothesized that fish utilize a set of pre-programmed strike kinematics that cannot be altered once initiated. However, more recent evidence has demonstrated that teleost fishes not only deploy unique strike kinematics for different prey types, but they also alter their kinematics in response to a prey item attempting to escape. It has not yet been explicitly investigated whether non-teleost actinopterygians can also modulate the strike in response to different prey types. Here, we examined the kinematics of suction strikes in bowfin, Amia ocellicauda, a holostean fish most closely related to gars. We recorded Amia feeding on both feeder fish and worms, two types of live prey differing in evasiveness, using X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology. We found significant prey-type effects on the magnitude, timing and velocity of jaw opening, hyoid arch depression and pectoral girdle motions. These prey-type effects demonstrate that the ability to modulate feeding strikes evolved early in actinopterygian fishes and is possibly the ancestral state for jawed vertebrates.
期刊介绍:
Proceedings B is the Royal Society’s flagship biological research journal, accepting original articles and reviews of outstanding scientific importance and broad general interest. The main criteria for acceptance are that a study is novel, and has general significance to biologists. Articles published cover a wide range of areas within the biological sciences, many have relevance to organisms and the environments in which they live. The scope includes, but is not limited to, ecology, evolution, behavior, health and disease epidemiology, neuroscience and cognition, behavioral genetics, development, biomechanics, paleontology, comparative biology, molecular ecology and evolution, and global change biology.