Sentient Intercultural Self-Efficacy: Constructing Intercultural Competence in Health Sciences students.

Debbie Álvarez-Cruces, Juan Mansilla-Sepúlveda, Alejandra Nocetti-DE-LA-Barra
{"title":"Sentient Intercultural Self-Efficacy: Constructing Intercultural Competence in Health Sciences students.","authors":"Debbie Álvarez-Cruces, Juan Mansilla-Sepúlveda, Alejandra Nocetti-DE-LA-Barra","doi":"10.30476/jamp.2025.104564.2067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The increase in migration movements, global health challenges, and the requirements of different organizations have emphasized the importance of Constructing Intercultural Competence (ICC). However, not all countries have policies to achieve this. Therefore, this research aimed to understand the process of constructing Intercultural Competence in the professional training of Health Sciences students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with a Grounded Theory design was conducted. Semi-structured interviews, lasting 40 to 50 minutes, were conducted with students in their last year of training to comply with the intensity sampling. Theoretical sampling was achieved using the Constant Comparative Methods, interview refinements, and data saturation by program and university to propose theoretical codes. Focused Coding allowed grouping and establishing relationships between the codes and categories. Two accredited Ethics Committees in Chile approved the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>106 students from three universities, including medicine, midwifery, nursing, nutrition, dentistry, pharmacy, and kinesiology, participated. Two categories were formed: 1) the construct of Intercultural Competence, composed of seven stages which were named Sentient Intercultural Self-Efficacy; and 2) precursors of the construct of Intercultural Competence, composed of intrapersonal characteristics, the nature of empathy and the materialization of will.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The precursors to the construction seem to favor critical thinking, which enables the development of Sentient Intercultural Self-Efficacy. However, the strong influence of valid scientific evidence, combined with vicarious learning, causes a setback in achieving the construction. This demonstrates the need to develop a critical perspective among students to challenge the prevailing <i>status quo</i> characterized by an equality and ethnocentric approach to patient care. Achieving <i>Intercultural Alternative Thinking</i>, where individuals are open to incorporating other treatment alternatives that may not necessarily have scientific evidence but could benefit patient recovery, is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":30645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","volume":"13 2","pages":"93-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2025.104564.2067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The increase in migration movements, global health challenges, and the requirements of different organizations have emphasized the importance of Constructing Intercultural Competence (ICC). However, not all countries have policies to achieve this. Therefore, this research aimed to understand the process of constructing Intercultural Competence in the professional training of Health Sciences students.

Methods: A qualitative study with a Grounded Theory design was conducted. Semi-structured interviews, lasting 40 to 50 minutes, were conducted with students in their last year of training to comply with the intensity sampling. Theoretical sampling was achieved using the Constant Comparative Methods, interview refinements, and data saturation by program and university to propose theoretical codes. Focused Coding allowed grouping and establishing relationships between the codes and categories. Two accredited Ethics Committees in Chile approved the study.

Results: 106 students from three universities, including medicine, midwifery, nursing, nutrition, dentistry, pharmacy, and kinesiology, participated. Two categories were formed: 1) the construct of Intercultural Competence, composed of seven stages which were named Sentient Intercultural Self-Efficacy; and 2) precursors of the construct of Intercultural Competence, composed of intrapersonal characteristics, the nature of empathy and the materialization of will.

Conclusion: The precursors to the construction seem to favor critical thinking, which enables the development of Sentient Intercultural Self-Efficacy. However, the strong influence of valid scientific evidence, combined with vicarious learning, causes a setback in achieving the construction. This demonstrates the need to develop a critical perspective among students to challenge the prevailing status quo characterized by an equality and ethnocentric approach to patient care. Achieving Intercultural Alternative Thinking, where individuals are open to incorporating other treatment alternatives that may not necessarily have scientific evidence but could benefit patient recovery, is essential.

感知跨文化自我效能:构建健康科学学生的跨文化能力。
引言:移民运动的增加、全球健康挑战和不同组织的要求都强调了构建跨文化能力(ICC)的重要性。然而,并非所有国家都有实现这一目标的政策。因此,本研究旨在了解跨文化能力在健康科学专业学生专业训练中的建构过程。方法:采用扎根理论设计进行定性研究。半结构化访谈,持续40至50分钟,在学生的最后一年的培训进行,以遵守强度抽样。理论抽样采用恒定比较法,访谈细化,数据饱和由程序和大学提出理论代码。集中编码允许在代码和类别之间进行分组和建立关系。智利两个经认可的伦理委员会批准了这项研究。结果:来自医学、助产学、护理学、营养学、牙科学、药学、运动学等3所高校的106名学生参与调查。形成了两类:1)跨文化能力的构建,由七个阶段组成,称为感知跨文化自我效能;2)跨文化能力构建的前驱,由人际特征、移情的本质和意志的物化组成。结论:建构的前体倾向于批判性思维,从而促进了感知跨文化自我效能感的发展。然而,有效的科学证据的强大影响,加上替代学习,导致了实现建设的挫折。这表明需要在学生中培养一种批判的观点,以挑战以平等和以种族为中心的病人护理方法为特征的普遍现状。实现跨文化替代思维是至关重要的,在这种思维中,个人愿意接受可能不一定有科学证据但可能有利于患者康复的其他治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信