Advancements in systemic therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review from the beginning to the latest updates.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Bladder Cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/23523735251335122
Takafumi Yanagisawa, Akihiro Matsukawa, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Keiichiro Mori, Tatsushi Kawada, Satoshi Katayama, Paweł Rajwa, Fahad Quhal, Benjamin Pradere, Marco Moschini, Shahrokh F Shariat, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura
{"title":"Advancements in systemic therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review from the beginning to the latest updates.","authors":"Takafumi Yanagisawa, Akihiro Matsukawa, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Keiichiro Mori, Tatsushi Kawada, Satoshi Katayama, Paweł Rajwa, Fahad Quhal, Benjamin Pradere, Marco Moschini, Shahrokh F Shariat, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura","doi":"10.1177/23523735251335122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Several phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the importance of perioperative systemic therapy, especially for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the growing evidence on the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for MIBC utilizing the data from RCTs.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Three databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in October 2024 for eligible RCTs evaluating oncologic outcomes in MIBC patients treated with systemic therapy. We evaluated pathological complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Thirty-three RCTs (including 14 ongoing trials) were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved OS compared to radical cystectomy alone. Particularly, the VESPER trial demonstrated that dd-MVAC provided oncological benefits over GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.71), and PFS (HR: 0.70). Recently, the NIAGARA trial showed that perioperative durvalumab plus GC outperformed GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.75), and EFS (HR: 0.68). Despite the lack of data on overall AE rates in the VESPER trial, differential safety profiles in hematologic toxicity were reported between dd-MVAC and durvalumab plus GC regimens. In the adjuvant setting, no study provided the OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, only adjuvant nivolumab had significant DFS and OS benefits compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains the current standard of care for MIBC. Durvalumab shed light on the promising impact of ICIs added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only ICI recommended as adjuvant therapy in patients who harbored adverse pathologic outcomes. Ongoing trials will provide further information on the impact of combination therapy, including chemotherapy, ICIs, and enfortumab vedotin, in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54217,"journal":{"name":"Bladder Cancer","volume":"11 2","pages":"23523735251335122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23523735251335122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Several phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the importance of perioperative systemic therapy, especially for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Objective: To synthesize the growing evidence on the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for MIBC utilizing the data from RCTs.

Evidence acquisition: Three databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in October 2024 for eligible RCTs evaluating oncologic outcomes in MIBC patients treated with systemic therapy. We evaluated pathological complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).

Evidence synthesis: Thirty-three RCTs (including 14 ongoing trials) were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved OS compared to radical cystectomy alone. Particularly, the VESPER trial demonstrated that dd-MVAC provided oncological benefits over GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.71), and PFS (HR: 0.70). Recently, the NIAGARA trial showed that perioperative durvalumab plus GC outperformed GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.75), and EFS (HR: 0.68). Despite the lack of data on overall AE rates in the VESPER trial, differential safety profiles in hematologic toxicity were reported between dd-MVAC and durvalumab plus GC regimens. In the adjuvant setting, no study provided the OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, only adjuvant nivolumab had significant DFS and OS benefits compared to placebo.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains the current standard of care for MIBC. Durvalumab shed light on the promising impact of ICIs added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only ICI recommended as adjuvant therapy in patients who harbored adverse pathologic outcomes. Ongoing trials will provide further information on the impact of combination therapy, including chemotherapy, ICIs, and enfortumab vedotin, in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.

肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的全身治疗进展:从开始到最新更新的系统综述。
背景:几项III期随机对照试验(rct)显示围手术期全身治疗的重要性,特别是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的新辅助和辅助治疗中的疗效。目的:利用随机对照试验的数据,综合越来越多的关于全身治疗MIBC的有效性和安全性的证据。证据获取:在2024年10月检索了三个数据库和ClinicalTrials.gov,以评估接受全身治疗的MIBC患者的肿瘤预后。我们评估了病理完全缓解(pCR)、无病生存期(DFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、无事件生存期(EFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(ae)。证据综合:本系统评价纳入33项随机对照试验(包括14项正在进行的试验)。与单纯根治性膀胱切除术相比,新辅助化疗改善了OS。值得一提的是,VESPER试验表明,在pCR率、OS (HR: 0.71)和PFS (HR: 0.70)方面,dd-MVAC比单独使用GC更具肿瘤学优势。最近,NIAGARA试验显示围手术期durvalumab联合GC在pCR率、OS (HR: 0.75)和EFS (HR: 0.68)方面优于单独GC。尽管VESPER试验中缺乏总体AE率的数据,但dd-MVAC和durvalumab + GC方案在血液学毒性方面的安全性存在差异。在辅助化疗的情况下,没有研究表明OS从辅助化疗中获益。然而,与安慰剂相比,只有辅助nivolumab具有显著的DFS和OS益处。结论:新辅助化疗仍然是目前治疗MIBC的标准。Durvalumab揭示了ICIs加入新辅助化疗的有希望的影响。Nivolumab是唯一一种推荐用于不良病理结果患者的辅助治疗的ICI。正在进行的试验将提供关于联合治疗的影响的进一步信息,包括化疗,ICIs和强制维多汀,在新辅助和辅助环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Bladder Cancer is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the epidemiology/etiology, genetics, molecular correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, ethics, patient advocacy and survivorship, diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine that expedites our fundamental understanding and improves treatment of tumors of the bladder and upper urinary tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信