Efficacy of immediate anti-hypertensive treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke stratified by mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure: a secondary analysis of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial.

IF 2.6 1区 医学
Ming Wang, Shiguang Zhu, Jiayi Long, Mengyue Cao, Yanbo Peng, Jing Chen, Tan Xu, Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Chongke Zhong
{"title":"Efficacy of immediate anti-hypertensive treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke stratified by mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure: a secondary analysis of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial.","authors":"Ming Wang, Shiguang Zhu, Jiayi Long, Mengyue Cao, Yanbo Peng, Jing Chen, Tan Xu, Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Chongke Zhong","doi":"10.1136/svn-2024-003896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP), two indicators of cerebral perfusion, could guide the selection of anti-hypertensive strategies after acute ischaemic stroke remains uncertain. Our study was to explore the impact of early anti-hypertensive intervention on adverse clinical outcomes following ischaemic stroke stratified by the levels of MAP and PP based on the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The trial randomised 4071 acute ischaemic stroke patients with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) to receive anti-hypertensive treatment (targeting a 10%-25% reduction in SBP during the 24 hours postrandomisation, reaching a BP level <140/90 mm Hg in 7 days, further keeping these levels throughout hospitalisation) or discontinue anti-hypertensive treatment during hospitalisation. The primary outcome was death or major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. Study outcomes were analysed by comparing the BP-lowering intervention group and control group, stratified by tertiles of MAP or PP levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome between the intervention and control groups across all MAP (p=0.69 for homogeneity) and PP (p=0.78 for homogeneity) categories. The corresponding odds ratios (95% CIs) were 1.08 (0.85-1.36), 0.92 (0.74-1.15) and 1.00 (0.81-1.25) for participants with low, intermediate, and high MAP and were 0.99 (0.79-1.25), 1.06 (0.84-1.34) and 0.95 (0.77-1.18) for participants in PP subgroups, respectively. Furthermore, early anti-hypertensive intervention was not associated with secondary outcomes (including neurological deterioration, recurrent stroke, vascular events and all-cause mortality) by MAP and PP (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early anti-hypertensive therapy neither decreased nor increased the odds of major disability, mortality, recurrent stroke or vascular events in patients with acute ischaemic stroke regardless of different MAP and PP levels.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01840072.</p>","PeriodicalId":48733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2024-003896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP), two indicators of cerebral perfusion, could guide the selection of anti-hypertensive strategies after acute ischaemic stroke remains uncertain. Our study was to explore the impact of early anti-hypertensive intervention on adverse clinical outcomes following ischaemic stroke stratified by the levels of MAP and PP based on the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS).

Methods: The trial randomised 4071 acute ischaemic stroke patients with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) to receive anti-hypertensive treatment (targeting a 10%-25% reduction in SBP during the 24 hours postrandomisation, reaching a BP level <140/90 mm Hg in 7 days, further keeping these levels throughout hospitalisation) or discontinue anti-hypertensive treatment during hospitalisation. The primary outcome was death or major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. Study outcomes were analysed by comparing the BP-lowering intervention group and control group, stratified by tertiles of MAP or PP levels.

Results: No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome between the intervention and control groups across all MAP (p=0.69 for homogeneity) and PP (p=0.78 for homogeneity) categories. The corresponding odds ratios (95% CIs) were 1.08 (0.85-1.36), 0.92 (0.74-1.15) and 1.00 (0.81-1.25) for participants with low, intermediate, and high MAP and were 0.99 (0.79-1.25), 1.06 (0.84-1.34) and 0.95 (0.77-1.18) for participants in PP subgroups, respectively. Furthermore, early anti-hypertensive intervention was not associated with secondary outcomes (including neurological deterioration, recurrent stroke, vascular events and all-cause mortality) by MAP and PP (all p>0.05).

Conclusions: Early anti-hypertensive therapy neither decreased nor increased the odds of major disability, mortality, recurrent stroke or vascular events in patients with acute ischaemic stroke regardless of different MAP and PP levels.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01840072.

按平均动脉压和脉压分层的急性缺血性脑卒中患者立即降压治疗的疗效:中国急性缺血性脑卒中降压试验的二次分析
背景:平均动脉压(MAP)和脉压(PP)这两个脑灌注指标是否能指导急性缺血性脑卒中后降压策略的选择尚不确定。我们的研究是在中国急性缺血性卒中降压试验(CATIS)的基础上,探讨早期降压干预对缺血性卒中后不良临床结局的影响,以MAP和PP水平分层。方法:该试验随机选择4071例收缩压升高的急性缺血性卒中患者接受降压治疗(目标是在随机化后24小时内收缩压降低10%-25%,达到血压水平)。结果:在所有MAP (p=0.69,同质性)和PP (p=0.78,同质性)类别中,干预组和对照组的主要结局无显著差异。低、中、高MAP组的比值比(95% ci)分别为1.08(0.85-1.36)、0.92(0.74-1.15)和1.00 (0.81-1.25),PP亚组的比值比分别为0.99(0.79-1.25)、1.06(0.84-1.34)和0.95(0.77-1.18)。此外,早期抗高血压干预与MAP和PP的次要结局(包括神经功能恶化、卒中复发、血管事件和全因死亡率)无关(p < 0.05)。结论:无论MAP和PP水平如何,早期降压治疗既没有降低也没有增加急性缺血性脑卒中患者发生重大残疾、死亡率、卒中复发或血管事件的几率。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01840072。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALMEDICINE, RESE-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信