"Is IT really good for all?" Evidence of different stakeholders' perspectives on the digital transformation of hospitals in the French health context.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Antonio Giangreco, Marion Lauwers, Andrea Martone, Francine Ponchaux
{"title":"\"Is IT really good for all?\" Evidence of different stakeholders' perspectives on the digital transformation of hospitals in the French health context.","authors":"Antonio Giangreco, Marion Lauwers, Andrea Martone, Francine Ponchaux","doi":"10.1177/09514848251332566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last two decades, processes of digital transformation have been progressively implemented in the sphere of public services, including the health sector, albeit at difference paces depending on organizations' levels of digital maturity. Although the nominal advantages of digitalizing health services are well identified in the conception phase, once implemented, the perceptions of different stakeholders tend to differentiate, even generating certain tensions. Based on qualitative grounded theory research approach among 15 different stakeholders from nine different hospitals of a regional health system located in the northern part of France, this study shows that different stakeholders perceived different advantages, such as improving the integration between the different stakeholders' practices, improving care practices, offering more services, and reducing costs and increasing efficiency. However, a paradox also emerged in the contraposition between the need for higher perceived quality, which requires more investments, and the search for efficiency through the digital transformation of health services, which aims at reducing costs. We conclude by discussing the theoretical contributions and implications for practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":" ","pages":"9514848251332566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848251332566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last two decades, processes of digital transformation have been progressively implemented in the sphere of public services, including the health sector, albeit at difference paces depending on organizations' levels of digital maturity. Although the nominal advantages of digitalizing health services are well identified in the conception phase, once implemented, the perceptions of different stakeholders tend to differentiate, even generating certain tensions. Based on qualitative grounded theory research approach among 15 different stakeholders from nine different hospitals of a regional health system located in the northern part of France, this study shows that different stakeholders perceived different advantages, such as improving the integration between the different stakeholders' practices, improving care practices, offering more services, and reducing costs and increasing efficiency. However, a paradox also emerged in the contraposition between the need for higher perceived quality, which requires more investments, and the search for efficiency through the digital transformation of health services, which aims at reducing costs. We conclude by discussing the theoretical contributions and implications for practice.

“它真的对所有人都有好处吗?”不同利益相关者对法国卫生背景下医院数字化转型的看法的证据。
过去二十年来,在公共服务领域(包括卫生部门)逐步实施了数字化转型进程,尽管速度因各组织数字化成熟度的不同而有所不同。尽管数字化卫生服务的名义优势在概念阶段就得到了很好的确定,但一旦实施,不同利益攸关方的看法往往会有所不同,甚至会产生某些紧张关系。本研究采用定性扎根理论研究方法,对法国北部某区域卫生系统的9家不同医院的15名不同利益相关者进行研究,结果表明,不同利益相关者感知到不同利益相关者的优势,如改善不同利益相关者实践之间的整合,改善护理实践,提供更多的服务,降低成本,提高效率。然而,对更高感知质量的需求(这需要更多的投资)与通过旨在降低成本的卫生服务数字化转型寻求效率之间的矛盾也出现了。最后,我们讨论了理论贡献和对实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Management Research
Health Services Management Research HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信