Benefits of using immersive virtual reality in haptic dental simulation for endodontic access cavity training: A comparative crossover study.

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Octave N Bandiaky, Valériane Loison, Christelle Volteau, Raphaëlle Crétin-Pirolli, Sébastien George, Assem Soueidan, Laurent Le Guehennec
{"title":"Benefits of using immersive virtual reality in haptic dental simulation for endodontic access cavity training: A comparative crossover study.","authors":"Octave N Bandiaky, Valériane Loison, Christelle Volteau, Raphaëlle Crétin-Pirolli, Sébastien George, Assem Soueidan, Laurent Le Guehennec","doi":"10.1111/iej.14252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of haptic virtual reality simulators in preclinical dental education is evolving rapidly. However, the application of immersive haptic simulations for specific dental procedures, such as access cavity preparation, has not been extensively explored.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to (i) evaluate the impact of using the VirTeaSy Dental® simulator in conjunction with a virtual reality (VR) headset on student performance during access cavity preparation, with a focus on haptic parameters; (ii) assess students' perceptions of the experience; and (iii) examine the side effects associated with VR headset use.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included 90 third-year dental students from the Dental Faculty of Nantes University, enrolled in January 2023. Participants were divided into two parallel groups. In Phase 1, Group 1 (n = 45) completed two endodontic access cavity exercises on the VirTeaSy Dental® without the VR headset, whilst Group 2 performed the same exercises using the VR headset. In Phase 2, the groups switched conditions and followed the same protocol. Performance was assessed using haptic parameters, and comparisons between groups for each phase were made using parametric and non-parametric tests (p < .05). Students also completed questionnaires to assess their experience and report any side effects from using the VR headset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both groups and phases, participants performed better in access cavity preparation without the VR headset. They showed greater accuracy, made fewer errors, and completed the exercises more quickly. Notably, more students failed to complete the exercises within the 10-minute time limit when using the VR headset (27 vs. 12 in Group 1, 23 vs. 13 in Group 2). Most participants expressed a preference for using VirTeaSy Dental® without the VR headset. Approximately, 20% of students reported side effects, including dizziness, nausea, migraines, and neck muscle fatigue.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that full immersion in haptic simulation, when paired with a VR headset, negatively impacts student performance in complex tasks such as access cavity preparation. These findings underscore the current limitations of immersive virtual reality in dental education and highlight the need for technical refinements before its widespread adoption in preclinical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14252","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of haptic virtual reality simulators in preclinical dental education is evolving rapidly. However, the application of immersive haptic simulations for specific dental procedures, such as access cavity preparation, has not been extensively explored.

Aims: This study aimed to (i) evaluate the impact of using the VirTeaSy Dental® simulator in conjunction with a virtual reality (VR) headset on student performance during access cavity preparation, with a focus on haptic parameters; (ii) assess students' perceptions of the experience; and (iii) examine the side effects associated with VR headset use.

Methodology: The study included 90 third-year dental students from the Dental Faculty of Nantes University, enrolled in January 2023. Participants were divided into two parallel groups. In Phase 1, Group 1 (n = 45) completed two endodontic access cavity exercises on the VirTeaSy Dental® without the VR headset, whilst Group 2 performed the same exercises using the VR headset. In Phase 2, the groups switched conditions and followed the same protocol. Performance was assessed using haptic parameters, and comparisons between groups for each phase were made using parametric and non-parametric tests (p < .05). Students also completed questionnaires to assess their experience and report any side effects from using the VR headset.

Results: Across both groups and phases, participants performed better in access cavity preparation without the VR headset. They showed greater accuracy, made fewer errors, and completed the exercises more quickly. Notably, more students failed to complete the exercises within the 10-minute time limit when using the VR headset (27 vs. 12 in Group 1, 23 vs. 13 in Group 2). Most participants expressed a preference for using VirTeaSy Dental® without the VR headset. Approximately, 20% of students reported side effects, including dizziness, nausea, migraines, and neck muscle fatigue.

Conclusion: The results suggest that full immersion in haptic simulation, when paired with a VR headset, negatively impacts student performance in complex tasks such as access cavity preparation. These findings underscore the current limitations of immersive virtual reality in dental education and highlight the need for technical refinements before its widespread adoption in preclinical training.

使用沉浸式虚拟现实在牙髓通道训练的触觉牙科模拟中的好处:一项比较交叉研究。
简介:触觉虚拟现实模拟器在临床前牙科教育中的应用正在迅速发展。然而,沉浸式触觉模拟在特定牙科手术中的应用,如通道腔准备,尚未得到广泛的探索。目的:本研究旨在(i)评估使用VirTeaSy Dental®模拟器结合虚拟现实(VR)耳机对学生在通道腔准备过程中的表现的影响,重点是触觉参数;(ii)评估学生对经验的看法;以及(iii)检查与VR头显使用相关的副作用。方法:研究对象为南特大学牙科学院2023年1月入学的90名牙科三年级学生。参与者被分成两组。在第一阶段,组1 (n = 45)在没有VR耳机的情况下使用VirTeaSy Dental®完成了两次牙髓通道练习,而组2使用VR耳机进行了相同的练习。在第二阶段,两组交换条件并遵循相同的协议。使用触觉参数评估性能,并使用参数和非参数测试对每个阶段的组间进行比较(p)结果:在两组和阶段中,参与者在没有VR耳机的情况下在通道腔准备中表现更好。他们表现出更高的准确性,犯更少的错误,并且更快地完成了练习。值得注意的是,使用VR头显时,更多的学生未能在10分钟的时间内完成练习(第1组27 vs. 12,第2组23 vs. 13)。大多数参与者表示更倾向于使用不带VR耳机的VirTeaSy Dental®。大约20%的学生报告了副作用,包括头晕、恶心、偏头痛和颈部肌肉疲劳。结论:研究结果表明,完全沉浸在触觉模拟中,当与VR耳机配对时,会对学生在复杂任务(如通道腔准备)中的表现产生负面影响。这些发现强调了目前沉浸式虚拟现实在牙科教育中的局限性,并强调了在临床前培训中广泛采用之前需要对技术进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信