Moderating effect of coping strategies on the association between perceived discrimination and blood pressure outcomes among young Black mothers in the InterGEN study.

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2025014
Alexandria Nyembwe, Yihong Zhao, Billy A Caceres, Kelli Hall, Laura Prescott, Stephanie Potts-Thompson, Morgan T Morrison, Cindy Crusto, Jacquelyn Y Taylor
{"title":"Moderating effect of coping strategies on the association between perceived discrimination and blood pressure outcomes among young Black mothers in the InterGEN study.","authors":"Alexandria Nyembwe, Yihong Zhao, Billy A Caceres, Kelli Hall, Laura Prescott, Stephanie Potts-Thompson, Morgan T Morrison, Cindy Crusto, Jacquelyn Y Taylor","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2025014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests experiences of racial discrimination influence blood pressure outcomes among Black women, but little is known about how coping strategies may influence this relationship. Our study aimed to assess the moderating effects of coping strategies on perceived racial discrimination and blood pressure among young Black mothers. We conducted a secondary analysis on data from the Intergenerational Impact of Genetic and Psychological Factors on Blood Pressure study. Eligible participants were African American or Black women aged 21 and older, who did not present with any cognitive disorder that may obscure reporting data, and who had a biological child who was 3-5 years old at the time of study enrollment. In our analysis, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were the primary outcomes, and experiences of discrimination situations and frequency subscales were the primary predictors. We considered the three subscales of the Coping Strategy Indicator (problem-solving, seeking social support, and avoidance) as moderators. Linear regression models were used. Of the 246 female participants (mean age: 31.3 years; SD = 5.8), the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 114 mmHg (SD = 13.8) and 73 mmHg (SD = 10.9), respectively. The frequency of experiences of perceived racial discrimination was significantly associated with higher systolic blood pressure, but this relationship was moderated among participants with greater seeking social support scores (p = 0.01). There were no significant moderation effects in models with diastolic blood pressure as the outcome. Future studies should examine this relationship longitudinally and further investigate specific coping strategies Black women use to manage perceived racial discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"12 1","pages":"217-232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2025014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests experiences of racial discrimination influence blood pressure outcomes among Black women, but little is known about how coping strategies may influence this relationship. Our study aimed to assess the moderating effects of coping strategies on perceived racial discrimination and blood pressure among young Black mothers. We conducted a secondary analysis on data from the Intergenerational Impact of Genetic and Psychological Factors on Blood Pressure study. Eligible participants were African American or Black women aged 21 and older, who did not present with any cognitive disorder that may obscure reporting data, and who had a biological child who was 3-5 years old at the time of study enrollment. In our analysis, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were the primary outcomes, and experiences of discrimination situations and frequency subscales were the primary predictors. We considered the three subscales of the Coping Strategy Indicator (problem-solving, seeking social support, and avoidance) as moderators. Linear regression models were used. Of the 246 female participants (mean age: 31.3 years; SD = 5.8), the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 114 mmHg (SD = 13.8) and 73 mmHg (SD = 10.9), respectively. The frequency of experiences of perceived racial discrimination was significantly associated with higher systolic blood pressure, but this relationship was moderated among participants with greater seeking social support scores (p = 0.01). There were no significant moderation effects in models with diastolic blood pressure as the outcome. Future studies should examine this relationship longitudinally and further investigate specific coping strategies Black women use to manage perceived racial discrimination.

在InterGEN研究中,应对策略对年轻黑人母亲感知歧视与血压结果之间关系的调节作用。
研究表明,种族歧视的经历会影响黑人女性的血压结果,但人们对应对策略如何影响这种关系知之甚少。本研究旨在评估应对策略对年轻黑人母亲种族歧视感知和血压的调节作用。我们对遗传和心理因素对血压的代际影响研究的数据进行了二次分析。符合条件的参与者是21岁及以上的非裔美国人或黑人女性,她们没有任何可能模糊报告数据的认知障碍,并且在研究登记时有一个3-5岁的亲生孩子。在我们的分析中,收缩压和舒张压是主要结局,辨别情况的经验和频率亚量表是主要预测因子。我们考虑了应对策略指标的三个子量表(解决问题、寻求社会支持和回避)作为调节因子。采用线性回归模型。246名女性参与者(平均年龄:31.3岁;SD = 5.8),平均收缩压和舒张压分别为114 mmHg (SD = 13.8)和73 mmHg (SD = 10.9)。感知到种族歧视的经历频率与较高的收缩压显著相关,但这种关系在寻求社会支持得分较高的参与者中被缓和(p = 0.01)。在以舒张压为结果的模型中,无显著的调节作用。未来的研究应该从纵向上考察这种关系,并进一步调查黑人妇女用来处理种族歧视的具体应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信