Using a Clinical Pathway to Safely Reduce Transfers and Admissions for Croup in the Urgent Care.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Donna R Wyly, Kathleen Berg, Andrea Melanson, Megan Gripka, David Skoglund, Maria V Blanco, Amanda Nedved
{"title":"Using a Clinical Pathway to Safely Reduce Transfers and Admissions for Croup in the Urgent Care.","authors":"Donna R Wyly, Kathleen Berg, Andrea Melanson, Megan Gripka, David Skoglund, Maria V Blanco, Amanda Nedved","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a croup clinical pathway (CP) on transfer rates from our urgent cares (UCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We revised our croup CP in November 2022 to recommend giving additional doses of racemic epinephrine (RE) in UC before transferring a patient and using shared decision-making with families on post-RE observation of their child at home or in a clinical setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with croup in 3 UCs who received RE in the pre-CP revision (November 2021 to October 2022) and post-CP revision (November 2022 to October 2023) periods. Interrupted time series analysis evaluated trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed encounters of 1575 patients diagnosed with croup in the pre-CP revision and 1530 patients in the post-CP revision. In the pre-CP revision period, 77 patients (4.9%) received RE, and 94 patients (6.1%) received RE in the post-CP revision (P=0.09). We saw a decrease in patients who received RE that were transferred from 32.5% in the pre-CP revision period (32.5%) to 10.6% in the post-CP revision period (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.56; P<0.001). However, Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated downward trends in both time periods with no significant difference over time. Patients discharged within 90 minutes of the last RE increased from 13.5% pre-CP revision to 33.3% post-CP revision (odds ratio, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.46-10.05; P=0.008). We did not see a change in return visits at 24 or 72 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although we saw a downward trend in the percentage of patients with croup transferred after receiving RE in our UCs post-CP revision, we did not see a significant decrease over time. However, this study demonstrates that providing additional RE doses for croup in UC and using shared decision-making with families in the setting for observation did not increase length of stay or return visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a croup clinical pathway (CP) on transfer rates from our urgent cares (UCs).

Methods: We revised our croup CP in November 2022 to recommend giving additional doses of racemic epinephrine (RE) in UC before transferring a patient and using shared decision-making with families on post-RE observation of their child at home or in a clinical setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with croup in 3 UCs who received RE in the pre-CP revision (November 2021 to October 2022) and post-CP revision (November 2022 to October 2023) periods. Interrupted time series analysis evaluated trends over time.

Results: We reviewed encounters of 1575 patients diagnosed with croup in the pre-CP revision and 1530 patients in the post-CP revision. In the pre-CP revision period, 77 patients (4.9%) received RE, and 94 patients (6.1%) received RE in the post-CP revision (P=0.09). We saw a decrease in patients who received RE that were transferred from 32.5% in the pre-CP revision period (32.5%) to 10.6% in the post-CP revision period (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.56; P<0.001). However, Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated downward trends in both time periods with no significant difference over time. Patients discharged within 90 minutes of the last RE increased from 13.5% pre-CP revision to 33.3% post-CP revision (odds ratio, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.46-10.05; P=0.008). We did not see a change in return visits at 24 or 72 hours.

Conclusion: Although we saw a downward trend in the percentage of patients with croup transferred after receiving RE in our UCs post-CP revision, we did not see a significant decrease over time. However, this study demonstrates that providing additional RE doses for croup in UC and using shared decision-making with families in the setting for observation did not increase length of stay or return visits.

使用临床途径,以安全减少转移和入院组在紧急护理。
目的:评估群体临床路径(CP)对急症护理(UCs)转诊率的影响。方法:我们于2022年11月修订了我们的组CP,建议在转移患者之前给予UC患者额外剂量的外消旋肾上腺素(RE),并与家庭共同决策在家中或临床环境中对其孩子进行RE后观察。我们对在cp前(2021年11月至2022年10月)和cp后(2022年11月至2023年10月)接受RE治疗的3例UCs患者进行了回顾性队列研究。中断时间序列分析评估了一段时间内的趋势。结果:我们回顾了1575例在cp前翻修和1530例在cp后翻修中被诊断为组的患者的遭遇。cp前翻修期有77例(4.9%)患者接受了RE, cp后翻修期有94例(6.1%)患者接受了RE (P=0.09)。我们发现接受RE的患者从cp修订前的32.5%(32.5%)下降到cp修订后的10.6%(优势比,0.25;95% ci, 0.11-0.56;结论:尽管我们看到UCs cp后翻修中接受RE后转组的患者百分比呈下降趋势,但随着时间的推移,我们没有看到明显的下降。然而,本研究表明,为UC患者提供额外的RE剂量,并在观察环境中与家庭共同决策,并没有增加住院时间或回访次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信