The impact of indocyanine green on tumor visualization and procedural adjustment in minimally invasive liver surgery.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Mareike Franz, Jörg Arend, Antonia Bollensdorf, Eric Lorenz, Mirhasan Rahimli, Frederike Stelter, Manuela Petersen, Andrew A Gumbs, Roland Croner
{"title":"The impact of indocyanine green on tumor visualization and procedural adjustment in minimally invasive liver surgery.","authors":"Mareike Franz, Jörg Arend, Antonia Bollensdorf, Eric Lorenz, Mirhasan Rahimli, Frederike Stelter, Manuela Petersen, Andrew A Gumbs, Roland Croner","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03712-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery is performed increasingly either with robotic assistance or conventional laparoscopy. The lack of haptic feedback is one of the main challenges which has to be addressed during these procedures. Especially in oncological minimally invasive liver surgery Indocyanine green (ICG) can help to gain additional information for improved oncological quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent minimally invasive liver surgery for liver tumors between 01/2019 and 09/2022 and matched the study criteria were selected from the Magdeburg Registry of Minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed retrospectively. The benefit of ICG for tumor identification and the resection procedure was assessed as 'very helpful', 'helpful' and 'not helpful' depending on the surgeon´s estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients who met the selection criteria were included in the analysis. Of these, 49 patients received ICG for intraoperative tumor visualization (ICG). Twenty-three patients with comparable demographics did not receive ICG and served as comparison group (nICG). A total of 69.4% robotic and 30.6% laparoscopic procedures were performed. In the ICG group procedural adjustments were significantly more frequent intraoperatively (p = 0.023). Intraoperative frozen section analysis on additional biopsies of ICG positive lesions were performed in 37% in the ICG group. In the nICG group suspect lesions, identified by ultrasound, went to frozen section in 17% (p = 0.006). Histopathological tumor positivity was identified in 12.2% in the ICG cohort vs no tumor positivity in the nICG cohort. This was one factor which led to the termination of surgery in 8% in the ICG vs the nICG 4.3% group (p = 0.485). In 88% intraoperative ICG visualization was scored as \"helpful\" when injected on preoperative day 4-7 with respect to the liver parenchyma structure and hepatocellular function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICG can improve oncological quality in minimally invasive liver resections. It provides additional visual information which can help to compensate the loss of haptics and tumor identification during liver tissue palpation. The intraoperative use of ICG was associated with no adverse events and did not prolong operative time. We recommend its routine use during minimally invasive liver surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03712-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery is performed increasingly either with robotic assistance or conventional laparoscopy. The lack of haptic feedback is one of the main challenges which has to be addressed during these procedures. Especially in oncological minimally invasive liver surgery Indocyanine green (ICG) can help to gain additional information for improved oncological quality.

Methods: Patients who underwent minimally invasive liver surgery for liver tumors between 01/2019 and 09/2022 and matched the study criteria were selected from the Magdeburg Registry of Minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed retrospectively. The benefit of ICG for tumor identification and the resection procedure was assessed as 'very helpful', 'helpful' and 'not helpful' depending on the surgeon´s estimation.

Results: Seventy-two patients who met the selection criteria were included in the analysis. Of these, 49 patients received ICG for intraoperative tumor visualization (ICG). Twenty-three patients with comparable demographics did not receive ICG and served as comparison group (nICG). A total of 69.4% robotic and 30.6% laparoscopic procedures were performed. In the ICG group procedural adjustments were significantly more frequent intraoperatively (p = 0.023). Intraoperative frozen section analysis on additional biopsies of ICG positive lesions were performed in 37% in the ICG group. In the nICG group suspect lesions, identified by ultrasound, went to frozen section in 17% (p = 0.006). Histopathological tumor positivity was identified in 12.2% in the ICG cohort vs no tumor positivity in the nICG cohort. This was one factor which led to the termination of surgery in 8% in the ICG vs the nICG 4.3% group (p = 0.485). In 88% intraoperative ICG visualization was scored as "helpful" when injected on preoperative day 4-7 with respect to the liver parenchyma structure and hepatocellular function.

Conclusion: ICG can improve oncological quality in minimally invasive liver resections. It provides additional visual information which can help to compensate the loss of haptics and tumor identification during liver tissue palpation. The intraoperative use of ICG was associated with no adverse events and did not prolong operative time. We recommend its routine use during minimally invasive liver surgery.

吲哚菁绿对肝脏微创手术中肿瘤显像及手术程序调整的影响。
背景:微创肝胆手术越来越多地在机器人辅助或传统腹腔镜下进行。缺乏触觉反馈是这些过程中必须解决的主要挑战之一。特别是在肿瘤微创肝手术中,吲哚菁绿(ICG)可以帮助获得额外的信息,以提高肿瘤质量。方法:从马格德堡微创肝脏手术登记处(MD-MILS)选择2019年1月至2022年9月期间接受肝脏肿瘤微创肝脏手术并符合研究标准的患者。回顾性分析患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征及围手术期资料。ICG对肿瘤识别和切除手术的益处根据外科医生的估计被评估为“非常有帮助”、“有帮助”和“没有帮助”。结果:72例符合选择标准的患者纳入分析。其中,49例患者接受了ICG术中肿瘤显像(ICG)。23例具有可比人口统计学特征的患者未接受ICG治疗,作为对照组(nICG)。其中69.4%为机器人手术,30.6%为腹腔镜手术。ICG组术中程序调整频率明显高于ICG组(p = 0.023)。术中对ICG阳性病变进行额外活检的冷冻切片分析占ICG组的37%。在nICG组中,超声发现的可疑病变有17%进入冷冻切片(p = 0.006)。ICG组中有12.2%的组织病理学肿瘤阳性,而nICG组中没有肿瘤阳性。这是导致ICG组(8%)和nICG组(4.3%)终止手术的一个因素(p = 0.485)。术前4-7天注射ICG显像,88%的患者对肝实质结构和肝细胞功能有“帮助”。结论:ICG可提高微创肝切除术的肿瘤质量。它提供了额外的视觉信息,可以帮助弥补触觉和肿瘤识别在肝组织触诊的损失。术中使用ICG无不良事件发生,且不延长手术时间。我们建议在微创肝脏手术中常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信