Uncertainty as a Barrier to Self-Care and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Seyma Demir Erbas, Ganime Esra Soysal
{"title":"Uncertainty as a Barrier to Self-Care and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.","authors":"Seyma Demir Erbas, Ganime Esra Soysal","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2024-0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Quality of life (QoL) and self-care behaviors (SCB) are crucial for patients with heart failure, yet the uncertainty surrounding health outcomes can severely undermine these aspects, particularly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to determine the collective impact of perceived uncertainty on both QoL and SCB in HFrEF patients. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted among 118 HFrEF patients recruited from cardiology clinics. Data were collected using the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Community Form, the Left Ventricular Dysfunction Scale, and the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. The primary analysis, a one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), assessed the relationship between uncertainty and the combined outcomes of QoL and SCB. Additional analyses, including a two-way MANOVA and multiple regression, examined predictors such as age, gender, body mass index, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. <b>Results:</b> Of the participants, 62.7% reported low uncertainty. Higher levels of uncertainty significantly predicted lower QoL and SCB scores (<i>F</i> = 15.795, <i>p</i> < .001, η² = .216). Other significant predictors included age, gender, body mass index, duration since diagnosis, and NYHA class. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> These findings highlight the pressing need for health care professionals to address uncertainty in HFrEF patients through tailored interventions. Reducing uncertainty can enhance both QoL and SCB, empowering patients to manage their condition more effectively. Future research should develop and evaluate interventions that reduce uncertainty, thereby fostering improved patient engagement, resilience, and long-term well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2024-0157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Quality of life (QoL) and self-care behaviors (SCB) are crucial for patients with heart failure, yet the uncertainty surrounding health outcomes can severely undermine these aspects, particularly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to determine the collective impact of perceived uncertainty on both QoL and SCB in HFrEF patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 118 HFrEF patients recruited from cardiology clinics. Data were collected using the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Community Form, the Left Ventricular Dysfunction Scale, and the European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale. The primary analysis, a one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), assessed the relationship between uncertainty and the combined outcomes of QoL and SCB. Additional analyses, including a two-way MANOVA and multiple regression, examined predictors such as age, gender, body mass index, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Results: Of the participants, 62.7% reported low uncertainty. Higher levels of uncertainty significantly predicted lower QoL and SCB scores (F = 15.795, p < .001, η² = .216). Other significant predictors included age, gender, body mass index, duration since diagnosis, and NYHA class. Implications for Practice: These findings highlight the pressing need for health care professionals to address uncertainty in HFrEF patients through tailored interventions. Reducing uncertainty can enhance both QoL and SCB, empowering patients to manage their condition more effectively. Future research should develop and evaluate interventions that reduce uncertainty, thereby fostering improved patient engagement, resilience, and long-term well-being.

不确定性是心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者自我护理和生活质量的障碍。
背景和目的:生活质量(QoL)和自我护理行为(SCB)对心力衰竭患者至关重要,但围绕健康结果的不确定性可能严重损害这些方面,特别是在心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的患者中。本研究旨在确定感知不确定性对HFrEF患者生活质量和SCB的总体影响。方法:从心脏病科门诊招募118例HFrEF患者进行横断面研究。数据采用米歇尔疾病不确定度量表-社区量表、左心室功能障碍量表和欧洲心力衰竭自我护理行为量表收集。初步分析采用单因素方差分析(MANOVA),评估不确定性与生活质量和SCB综合结果之间的关系。其他分析,包括双向方差分析和多元回归,检查了预测因素,如年龄、性别、体重指数和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)等级。结果:62.7%的参与者报告了低不确定性。较高的不确定性水平显著预测较低的生活质量和SCB评分(F = 15.795, p < 0.001, η²= 0.216)。其他重要的预测因素包括年龄、性别、体重指数、诊断后持续时间和NYHA等级。实践意义:这些发现强调了卫生保健专业人员迫切需要通过量身定制的干预措施来解决HFrEF患者的不确定性。减少不确定性可以提高生活质量和SCB,使患者能够更有效地管理自己的病情。未来的研究应该开发和评估减少不确定性的干预措施,从而提高患者的参与度、恢复力和长期幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信