Premature Atrial Contractions as a Marker of Atrial Cardiopathy: A Revised Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Adi Elias, Justin T Teraoka, Elsayed Z Soliman, Mitchell S V Elkind, Hooman Kamel, Richard A Kronmal, W T Longstreth, David L Tirschwell, Marco R Di Tullio, Gregory M Marcus
{"title":"Premature Atrial Contractions as a Marker of Atrial Cardiopathy: A Revised Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Trial.","authors":"Adi Elias, Justin T Teraoka, Elsayed Z Soliman, Mitchell S V Elkind, Hooman Kamel, Richard A Kronmal, W T Longstreth, David L Tirschwell, Marco R Di Tullio, Gregory M Marcus","doi":"10.1111/jce.16629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial cardiopathy may be associated with an increased risk of stroke independent of atrial fibrillation (AF). In the ARCADIA trial, apixaban was not superior to aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke among patients with a cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. We aimed to determine whether the presence of at least one premature atrial complex (PAC), a known harbinger of AF and stroke, would enhance the ability to identify individuals most likely to benefit from apixaban.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In ARCADIA, atrial cardiopathy was defined by NT-proBNP > 250 pg/mL, a P-wave terminal force greater than 5000 μV × ms in lead V1, or a left atrial diameter index ≥ 3 cm/m² on echocardiogram. For the current analysis, the presence of any PAC on the baseline 12-lead ECG was substituted for the less atrial-specific NT-proBNP criterion. The presence of any PAC was also assessed as a sole atrial cardiopathy criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1015 patients randomized in ARCADIA, 85 had at least one PAC. The revised atrial cardiopathy criteria were met by 593 patients; 301 were randomized to apixaban and 292 to aspirin. The annualized recurrent stroke rates were 3.1% for apixaban versus 4.4% for aspirin (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38-1.34, p = 0.29). No differences in risk of recurrent stroke among participants with PACs, compared to those without PACs, were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients enrolled in the ARCARDIA trial, utilizing the presence of PACs as a potential marker of atrial cardiopathy did not reveal definitive evidence of benefit of apixaban compared to aspirin.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03192215.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial cardiopathy may be associated with an increased risk of stroke independent of atrial fibrillation (AF). In the ARCADIA trial, apixaban was not superior to aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke among patients with a cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. We aimed to determine whether the presence of at least one premature atrial complex (PAC), a known harbinger of AF and stroke, would enhance the ability to identify individuals most likely to benefit from apixaban.

Methods: In ARCADIA, atrial cardiopathy was defined by NT-proBNP > 250 pg/mL, a P-wave terminal force greater than 5000 μV × ms in lead V1, or a left atrial diameter index ≥ 3 cm/m² on echocardiogram. For the current analysis, the presence of any PAC on the baseline 12-lead ECG was substituted for the less atrial-specific NT-proBNP criterion. The presence of any PAC was also assessed as a sole atrial cardiopathy criterion.

Results: Of the 1015 patients randomized in ARCADIA, 85 had at least one PAC. The revised atrial cardiopathy criteria were met by 593 patients; 301 were randomized to apixaban and 292 to aspirin. The annualized recurrent stroke rates were 3.1% for apixaban versus 4.4% for aspirin (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38-1.34, p = 0.29). No differences in risk of recurrent stroke among participants with PACs, compared to those without PACs, were observed.

Conclusion: In patients enrolled in the ARCARDIA trial, utilizing the presence of PACs as a potential marker of atrial cardiopathy did not reveal definitive evidence of benefit of apixaban compared to aspirin.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03192215.

房性早搏作为房性心脏病的标志:ARCADIA随机试验的修正分析。
导言:心房心脏病可能与卒中风险增加相关,独立于心房颤动(AF)。在ARCADIA试验中,阿哌沙班在预防隐源性卒中和心房心脏病患者复发性卒中方面并不优于阿司匹林。我们的目的是确定是否存在至少一种过早心房复合体(PAC),一种已知的房颤和中风的先兆,将增强识别最有可能从阿哌沙班获益的个体的能力。方法:在ARCADIA中,通过NT-proBNP > 250 pg/mL、V1导联p波终末力大于5000 μV × ms或超声心动图左房内径指数≥3cm /m²诊断心房心脏病。在目前的分析中,基线12导联心电图上任何PAC的存在都被替代了心房特异性较低的NT-proBNP标准。任何PAC的存在也被评估为唯一的心房心脏病标准。结果:在ARCADIA随机分组的1015例患者中,85例至少有一种PAC。593例患者符合修订后的心房心脏病标准;301例随机分到阿哌沙班组,292例分到阿司匹林组。阿哌沙班组的年化卒中复发率为3.1%,阿司匹林组为4.4% (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38-1.34, p = 0.29)。与没有PACs的参与者相比,有PACs的参与者中风复发的风险没有差异。结论:在ARCARDIA试验的患者中,利用PACs的存在作为心房心脏病的潜在标志物并没有显示阿哌沙班与阿司匹林相比有益的明确证据。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03192215。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信