{"title":"Evaluation of a Fast-Solving Rigid Body Spine Model Inclusive of Intra-Abdominal Pressure.","authors":"Siril Teja Dukkipati, Mark Driscoll","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2025.3561692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traditional spine biomechanical models often neglect the load-sharing effect of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on the spine and can be computationally intensive. These limitations hinder their effectiveness in muscle recruitment simulations where iterative calculations are required. Thus, a need exists for validated fast-solving IAP-integrated musculoskeletal lumbar spine models, hence developed herein.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rigid-body model consisting of the pelvis, lumbar vertebrae, a lumped thoracic spine and the ribcage, derived from MRI scans of a healthy adult male, was devised. The intervertebral discs were modeled as 3 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) gimbal joints using nonlinear moment-rotation relationships. Spinal ligaments were modeled as nonlinear tension-only springs. Two methods of modeling IAP were discussed and implemented. Model#1 represented IAP as normal force vectors on the diaphragm and the spine, while model#2 idealized the abdominal wall compliance using spring-damper elements inside the cavity. Level-by-level spinal stiffness was validated under pure moment loading up to 7.5Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model segmental stiffness profiles in all three bending modes were within one standard deviation of literature datasets. IAP model #1 revealed a linear increase in the spinal extensor torque about L3 with increase in IAP, consistent with literature, while model #2 suggested decreased spinal range of motion with increased abdominal cavity stiffness. The model consisted of 15 DOFs, compiled in 6sec and simulated in 1.4sec.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This MATLAB native model could be a useful tool to quickly and intuitively visualize physiological spine loading.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>A novel fast-solving lumbar musculoskeletal model with IAP was presented in this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2025.3561692","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Traditional spine biomechanical models often neglect the load-sharing effect of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on the spine and can be computationally intensive. These limitations hinder their effectiveness in muscle recruitment simulations where iterative calculations are required. Thus, a need exists for validated fast-solving IAP-integrated musculoskeletal lumbar spine models, hence developed herein.
Methods: A rigid-body model consisting of the pelvis, lumbar vertebrae, a lumped thoracic spine and the ribcage, derived from MRI scans of a healthy adult male, was devised. The intervertebral discs were modeled as 3 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) gimbal joints using nonlinear moment-rotation relationships. Spinal ligaments were modeled as nonlinear tension-only springs. Two methods of modeling IAP were discussed and implemented. Model#1 represented IAP as normal force vectors on the diaphragm and the spine, while model#2 idealized the abdominal wall compliance using spring-damper elements inside the cavity. Level-by-level spinal stiffness was validated under pure moment loading up to 7.5Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation.
Results: Model segmental stiffness profiles in all three bending modes were within one standard deviation of literature datasets. IAP model #1 revealed a linear increase in the spinal extensor torque about L3 with increase in IAP, consistent with literature, while model #2 suggested decreased spinal range of motion with increased abdominal cavity stiffness. The model consisted of 15 DOFs, compiled in 6sec and simulated in 1.4sec.
Conclusion: This MATLAB native model could be a useful tool to quickly and intuitively visualize physiological spine loading.
Significance: A novel fast-solving lumbar musculoskeletal model with IAP was presented in this research.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.