Patient CT-based simulation study of secondary-electron-bremsstrahlung imaging for range verification in proton therapy: comparison with prompt gamma and PET imaging for simplified proton pencil beam and SOBP irradiation scenarios.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Takuya Yabe, Munetaka Nitta, Mitsutaka Yamaguchi, Marco Pinto, Naoki Kawachi, Katia Parodi
{"title":"Patient CT-based simulation study of secondary-electron-bremsstrahlung imaging for range verification in proton therapy: comparison with prompt gamma and PET imaging for simplified proton pencil beam and SOBP irradiation scenarios.","authors":"Takuya Yabe, Munetaka Nitta, Mitsutaka Yamaguchi, Marco Pinto, Naoki Kawachi, Katia Parodi","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/add4b7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Secondary electron bremsstrahlung (SEB) imaging, along with prompt gamma (PG) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, has been proposed as an<i>in vivo</i>range verification tool for proton therapy. This study presents the first simulation based on patient computed tomography (CT) data to investigate the feasibility of SEB imaging for range verification in proton therapy, while comparing the characteristics of SEB imaging with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Approach.</i>A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using patient CT data for the irradiation of monoenergetic pencil beams and spread-out Bragg peak proton beams. The physical characteristics of SEB imaging were analyzed at three different anatomical sites and compared with those of PG and PET imaging.<i>Main results</i>. In all the treatment cases, SEB imaging exhibited higher production rates than PG and PET imaging, particularly in the regions with high CT values along the beam path. Although the SEB signal was more affected by scattering and absorption than the PET or PG signals, sufficient statistical counts for range verification (∼3 × 10<sup>-3</sup>SEBs/proton) could potentially be detected outside the patient geometry. For pencil beam cases, the SEB and PET fall-offs were located 4-5 mm proximal to the dose fall-off, while the PG fall-off was located 0-1 mm distal to it.<i>Significance.</i>Results suggest that SEB imaging has the potential to offer a real-time range verification tool (by comparing measured and expected images), particularly for treating shallow-seated tumors using proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Thus, this study represents a significant step towards the clinical application of range verification based on SEB imaging and promotes future efforts in this direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add4b7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Secondary electron bremsstrahlung (SEB) imaging, along with prompt gamma (PG) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, has been proposed as anin vivorange verification tool for proton therapy. This study presents the first simulation based on patient computed tomography (CT) data to investigate the feasibility of SEB imaging for range verification in proton therapy, while comparing the characteristics of SEB imaging with those of PG and PET imaging.Approach.A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using patient CT data for the irradiation of monoenergetic pencil beams and spread-out Bragg peak proton beams. The physical characteristics of SEB imaging were analyzed at three different anatomical sites and compared with those of PG and PET imaging.Main results. In all the treatment cases, SEB imaging exhibited higher production rates than PG and PET imaging, particularly in the regions with high CT values along the beam path. Although the SEB signal was more affected by scattering and absorption than the PET or PG signals, sufficient statistical counts for range verification (∼3 × 10-3SEBs/proton) could potentially be detected outside the patient geometry. For pencil beam cases, the SEB and PET fall-offs were located 4-5 mm proximal to the dose fall-off, while the PG fall-off was located 0-1 mm distal to it.Significance.Results suggest that SEB imaging has the potential to offer a real-time range verification tool (by comparing measured and expected images), particularly for treating shallow-seated tumors using proton pencil-beam scanning delivery. Thus, this study represents a significant step towards the clinical application of range verification based on SEB imaging and promotes future efforts in this direction.

基于患者ct的二次电子轫致辐射成像用于质子治疗范围验证的模拟研究:与简化质子铅笔束和SOBP照射场景的提示伽马和PET成像的比较。
目的:二次电子轫致辐射(SEB)成像,以及提示伽马(PG)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像,已被提出作为质子治疗的活体验证工具。本研究首次基于患者计算机断层扫描(CT)数据进行模拟,探讨SEB成像用于质子治疗范围验证的可行性,并将SEB成像与PG和PET成像的特征进行比较。方法:利用患者CT数据进行蒙特卡罗模拟,模拟单能量铅笔束和展开布拉格峰质子束的辐照。分析了三个不同解剖部位的SEB成像的物理特征,并与PG和PET成像进行了比较。主要结果:在所有治疗病例中,SEB成像显示出比PG和PET成像更高的生成率,特别是在沿光束路径的高CT值区域。虽然SEB信号受散射和吸收的影响比PET或PG信号更大,但可以在患者几何结构外检测到足够的统计计数用于范围验证(~3 × 10- 3seb /质子)。对于铅笔束病例,SEB和PET脱落位于剂量脱落近端4-5 mm,而PG脱落位于剂量脱落远端0-1 mm。意义:结果表明SEB成像有可能提供实时范围验证工具(通过比较测量和预期图像),特别是使用质子铅笔束扫描递送治疗浅部肿瘤。因此,本研究为基于SEB成像的距离验证的临床应用迈出了重要的一步,并推动了该方向的未来努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信