Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach Versus Robotic Gasless Axillary Approach for Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of robotic thyroidectomy techniques, including the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) and the robotic gasless axillary approach (GAA).

Data sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 5 major electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) to identify relevant studies published until May 2024.

Review methods: Analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software with pooled mean and rate ratios calculated with 95% CIs.

Results: A total of 73 studies, comprising 70 eligible for meta-analysis, were included. Compared with robotic GAA, robotic BABA was associated with significantly longer operative time (pooled mean: 64.65 min, 95% CI: 51.77-77.53, P<0.00001), increased hospital stay (pooled mean: 1.24 d, 95% CI: 0.92-1.56, P<0.00001), and higher intraoperative bleeding (pooled mean: 44.90 mL, 95% CI: 26.99-62.81, P<0.00001). While no significant differences were observed in the rates of hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, chyle leakage, seroma, hematoma, or infection, the incidence of Horner syndrome was significantly higher in the BABA group (pooled risk ratio: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.05, P=0.003).

Conclusions: Robotic BABA was associated with longer operative times, increased hospital stays, and higher intraoperative bleeding compared with Robotic GAA, although both techniques demonstrated comparable safety profiles for most outcomes. The higher incidence of Horner syndrome with BABA should be considered when selecting the optimal surgical approach for thyroidectomy.