Unsupervised non-small cell lung cancer tumor segmentation using cycled generative adversarial network with similarity-based discriminator

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chengyijue Fang, Xiaoyang Li, Yidong Yang
{"title":"Unsupervised non-small cell lung cancer tumor segmentation using cycled generative adversarial network with similarity-based discriminator","authors":"Chengyijue Fang,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Li,&nbsp;Yidong Yang","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Tumor segmentation is crucial for lung disease diagnosis and treatment. Most existing deep learning-based automatic segmentation methods rely on manually annotated data for network training.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to develop an unsupervised tumor segmentation network smic-GAN by using a similarity-driven generative adversarial network trained with cycle strategy. The proposed method does not rely on any manual annotations and thus reduce the training data preparation workload.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 609 CT scans of lung cancer patients are collected, of which 504 are used for training, 35 for validation, and 70 for testing. Smic-GAN is developed and trained to transform lung CT slices with tumors into synthetic images without tumors. Residual images are obtained by subtracting synthetic images from original CT slices. Thresholding, 3D median filtering, morphological erosion, and dilation operations are implemented to generate binary tumor masks from the residual images. Dice similarity, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (SEN), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and average surface distance (ASD) are used to evaluate the accuracy of tumor contouring.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The smic-GAN method achieved a performance comparable to two supervised methods UNet and Incre-MRRN, and outperformed unsupervised cycle-GAN. The Dice value for smic-GAN is significantly better than cycle-GAN (74.5% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 11.2% vs. 69.1% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 16.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The PPV for smic-GAN, UNet, and Incre-MRRN are 83.8% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 21.5%,75.1% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 19.7%, and 78.2% <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 16.6% respectively. The HD95 are 10.3 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 7.7, 14.5 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 14.6 and 6.2 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 4.0 mm, respectively. The ASD are 3.7 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 2.7, 4.8 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 3.8, and 2.4 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 1.8 mm, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed smic-GAN performs comparably to the existing supervised methods UNet and Incre-MRRN. It does not rely on any manual annotations and can reduce the workload of training data preparation. It can also provide a good start for manual annotation in the training of supervised networks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tumor segmentation is crucial for lung disease diagnosis and treatment. Most existing deep learning-based automatic segmentation methods rely on manually annotated data for network training.

Purpose

This study aims to develop an unsupervised tumor segmentation network smic-GAN by using a similarity-driven generative adversarial network trained with cycle strategy. The proposed method does not rely on any manual annotations and thus reduce the training data preparation workload.

Methods

A total of 609 CT scans of lung cancer patients are collected, of which 504 are used for training, 35 for validation, and 70 for testing. Smic-GAN is developed and trained to transform lung CT slices with tumors into synthetic images without tumors. Residual images are obtained by subtracting synthetic images from original CT slices. Thresholding, 3D median filtering, morphological erosion, and dilation operations are implemented to generate binary tumor masks from the residual images. Dice similarity, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (SEN), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and average surface distance (ASD) are used to evaluate the accuracy of tumor contouring.

Results

The smic-GAN method achieved a performance comparable to two supervised methods UNet and Incre-MRRN, and outperformed unsupervised cycle-GAN. The Dice value for smic-GAN is significantly better than cycle-GAN (74.5% ± $ \pm $ 11.2% vs. 69.1%  ± $ \pm $ 16.0%, p < 0.05). The PPV for smic-GAN, UNet, and Incre-MRRN are 83.8% ± $ \pm $ 21.5%,75.1% ± $ \pm $ 19.7%, and 78.2%  ± $ \pm $ 16.6% respectively. The HD95 are 10.3 ± $\pm $ 7.7, 14.5 ± $\pm $ 14.6 and 6.2 ± $\pm $ 4.0 mm, respectively. The ASD are 3.7 ± $\pm $ 2.7, 4.8 ± $\pm $ 3.8, and 2.4 ± $\pm $ 1.8 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

The proposed smic-GAN performs comparably to the existing supervised methods UNet and Incre-MRRN. It does not rely on any manual annotations and can reduce the workload of training data preparation. It can also provide a good start for manual annotation in the training of supervised networks.

Abstract Image

基于相似性判别器的循环生成对抗网络的无监督非小细胞肺癌肿瘤分割。
背景:肿瘤分割对肺部疾病的诊断和治疗至关重要。大多数现有的基于深度学习的自动分割方法依赖于人工标注的数据进行网络训练。目的:利用循环策略训练的相似驱动生成对抗网络,开发无监督肿瘤分割网络smic-GAN。该方法不依赖于人工标注,减少了训练数据准备的工作量。方法:收集肺癌患者CT扫描609张,其中504张用于训练,35张用于验证,70张用于检测。Smic-GAN被开发和训练用于将有肿瘤的肺部CT切片转化为没有肿瘤的合成图像。残差图像是通过在原始CT切片上减去合成图像得到的。采用阈值分割、三维中值滤波、形态侵蚀和扩张操作,从残差图像中生成二值肿瘤掩模。采用骰子相似度、阳性预测值(PPV)、灵敏度(SEN)、95% Hausdorff距离(HD95)和平均表面距离(ASD)评价肿瘤轮廓的准确性。结果:smic-GAN方法的性能与两种监督方法UNet和incren - mrrn相当,优于无监督循环gan。smic-GAN的Dice值(74.5%±$ \pm $ 11.2%)明显优于cycle-GAN(69.1%±$ \pm $ 16.0%, p±$ \pm $ 21.5%,75.1%±$ \pm $ 19.7%, 78.2%±$ \pm $ 16.6%)。HD95分别为10.3±$\pm $ 7.7、14.5±$\pm $ 14.6和6.2±$\pm $ 4.0 mm。ASD分别为3.7±$\pm $ 2.7、4.8±$\pm $ 3.8和2.4±$\pm $ 1.8 mm。结论:smic-GAN的性能与现有的监督方法UNet和incren - mrrn相当。它不依赖于任何手工标注,可以减少训练数据准备的工作量。这也为监督网络训练中的人工标注提供了一个良好的开端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信