Picture Perfect: An Analysis of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Website Imagery and Language.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00181
Katarina Nilsson, Kevin M Posner, Cassandra Bakus, Mallery Zieman, Daniel Thiemann, Thomas Gunning, Dante Implicito
{"title":"Picture Perfect: An Analysis of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Website Imagery and Language.","authors":"Katarina Nilsson, Kevin M Posner, Cassandra Bakus, Mallery Zieman, Daniel Thiemann, Thomas Gunning, Dante Implicito","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is important on patient-facing orthopaedic websites for patients to connect with healthcare providers. Image representation and language availability on websites allow for improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate DEI in orthopaedics through the critical evaluation of patient-facing imagery and language present on orthopaedic sports medicine websites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the US News and World Rankings, the top 50 orthopaedic departments were compiled. The orthopaedic sports medicine websites with images (N = 36) were analyzed for representation of skin color/sex in images and language availability. The data were then compared with demographic information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an increase in the proportion of White (19.11%, p = 0.003) and male patients (16.17%, p = 0.047) in website images compared with demographics. There was a decrease in the proportion of patients of color (16.17%, p = 0.012) and female patients (12.27%, p = 0.047) in website images compared with demographics. Of the 36 websites, 50% did not mention the availability of translated materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The images found on orthopaedic webpages overrepresent White and male patients while underrepresenting patients of color and female patients compared with local demographics. In addition, half of the orthopaedic sports medicine webpages lacked translated resources for non-English speaking patients, limiting their language accessibility. Orthopaedic programs could better use patient-facing websites to incorporate DEI for their patients, which could improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) is important on patient-facing orthopaedic websites for patients to connect with healthcare providers. Image representation and language availability on websites allow for improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate DEI in orthopaedics through the critical evaluation of patient-facing imagery and language present on orthopaedic sports medicine websites.

Methods: Using the US News and World Rankings, the top 50 orthopaedic departments were compiled. The orthopaedic sports medicine websites with images (N = 36) were analyzed for representation of skin color/sex in images and language availability. The data were then compared with demographic information.

Results: There was an increase in the proportion of White (19.11%, p = 0.003) and male patients (16.17%, p = 0.047) in website images compared with demographics. There was a decrease in the proportion of patients of color (16.17%, p = 0.012) and female patients (12.27%, p = 0.047) in website images compared with demographics. Of the 36 websites, 50% did not mention the availability of translated materials.

Conclusion: The images found on orthopaedic webpages overrepresent White and male patients while underrepresenting patients of color and female patients compared with local demographics. In addition, half of the orthopaedic sports medicine webpages lacked translated resources for non-English speaking patients, limiting their language accessibility. Orthopaedic programs could better use patient-facing websites to incorporate DEI for their patients, which could improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

图片完美:骨科运动医学网站图像和语言的多样性、公平性和包容性分析。
背景:多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)在面向患者的骨科网站上对患者与医疗保健提供者联系很重要。网站上的图像表示和语言可用性可以改善患者的治疗效果。本研究的目的是通过对骨科运动医学网站上出现的面向患者的图像和语言进行批判性评估来调查骨科的DEI。方法:采用《美国新闻》和《世界排名》,编制排名前50位的骨科。对36个骨科运动医学网站的图片进行肤色/性别表征和语言可用性分析。然后将这些数据与人口统计信息进行比较。结果:网站图片中白人患者(19.11%,p = 0.003)和男性患者(16.17%,p = 0.047)的比例较人口统计学有所增加。网站图片中有色人种患者的比例(16.17%,p = 0.012)和女性患者的比例(12.27%,p = 0.047)较人口统计学有所下降。在36个网站中,50%的网站没有提及翻译材料的可用性。结论:与当地人口统计数据相比,骨科网页上的图像对白人和男性患者的代表性过高,而对有色人种和女性患者的代表性不足。此外,一半的骨科运动医学网页缺乏非英语患者的翻译资源,限制了他们的语言可及性。骨科项目可以更好地利用面向患者的网站为他们的患者整合DEI,这可以提高患者的满意度和结果。证据等级:IV级。参见《作者说明》获得证据等级的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信