General anesthesia versus locoregional anesthesia in pediatric forearm fractures.

Abstract

Aim of the study: Aim is to define whether the type of anesthesia during the reduction and fixation of a pediatric forearm fracture, can influence the fracture reduction technique.

Materials and methods: All surgically treated forearm fractures were enrolled: patients underwent a different anesthesiology protocol depending on the on-call anesthesiologist: deep sedation in which the patient is still able to breathe with limited external support and nerve block (group A) and general anesthesia with curare (group B). Demographic data, type of fracture, surgical timing and technique, anesthesia type and timing, and clinical outcomes were recorded.

Outcomes: Of the total 326 patients considered, 228 children were treated by closed reduction (70%), and 98 children were treated by open reduction (30%). Of the latter, 75% of the fractures reduced open were of group A and 25% were of group B. In more detail, in group A, of the 162 patients, 73 (45%) required an open reduction, while 89 (55%) did not. In group B, of the 164 patients, 25 (15%) required an open reduction, while 139 (85%) did not. This resulted in being statistically significant (p = 0.001). No statistically significant results emerged from the data related to complication and range of motion apart from the pronation movement (p = 0.153).

Conclusion: According to our data, the use of curare, in a pediatric forearm fracture reduction and stabilization surgery, leads to a reduction in the number of open treatments. If deep sedation and nerve block are preferred to improve postoperative pain control, the technique and timing should be improved to facilitate reduction.