Benchmarking Radiology Report Generation From Noisy Free-Texts.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yujian Yuan, Yanting Zheng, Liangqiong Qu
{"title":"Benchmarking Radiology Report Generation From Noisy Free-Texts.","authors":"Yujian Yuan, Yanting Zheng, Liangqiong Qu","doi":"10.1109/JBHI.2025.3569428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automatic radiology report generation can enhance diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. However, clean open-source imaging scan-report pairs are limited in scale and variety. Moreover, the vast amount of radiological texts available online is often too noisy to be directly employed. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel task called Noisy Report Refinement (NRR), which generates radiology reports from noisy free-texts. To achieve this, we propose a report refinement pipeline that leverages large language models (LLMs) enhanced with guided self-critique and report selection strategies. To address the inability of existing radiology report generation metrics in measuring cleanliness, radiological usefulness, and factual correctness across various modalities of reports in NRR task, we introduce a new benchmark, NRRBench, for NRR evaluation. This benchmark includes two online-sourced datasets and four clinically explainable LLM-based metrics: two metrics evaluate the matching rate of radiology entities and modality-specific template attributes respectively, one metric assesses report cleanliness, and a combined metric evaluates overall NRR performance. Experiments demonstrate that guided self-critique and report selection strategies significantly improve the quality of refined reports. Additionally, our proposed metrics show a much higher correlation with noisy rate and error count of reports than radiology report generation metrics in evaluating NRR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13073,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3569428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic radiology report generation can enhance diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. However, clean open-source imaging scan-report pairs are limited in scale and variety. Moreover, the vast amount of radiological texts available online is often too noisy to be directly employed. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel task called Noisy Report Refinement (NRR), which generates radiology reports from noisy free-texts. To achieve this, we propose a report refinement pipeline that leverages large language models (LLMs) enhanced with guided self-critique and report selection strategies. To address the inability of existing radiology report generation metrics in measuring cleanliness, radiological usefulness, and factual correctness across various modalities of reports in NRR task, we introduce a new benchmark, NRRBench, for NRR evaluation. This benchmark includes two online-sourced datasets and four clinically explainable LLM-based metrics: two metrics evaluate the matching rate of radiology entities and modality-specific template attributes respectively, one metric assesses report cleanliness, and a combined metric evaluates overall NRR performance. Experiments demonstrate that guided self-critique and report selection strategies significantly improve the quality of refined reports. Additionally, our proposed metrics show a much higher correlation with noisy rate and error count of reports than radiology report generation metrics in evaluating NRR.

从嘈杂的自由文本生成基准放射学报告。
自动生成放射学报告可以提高诊断效率和准确性。然而,干净的开源成像扫描-报告对在规模和种类上是有限的。此外,网上可获得的大量放射学资料往往过于嘈杂,无法直接使用。为了应对这一挑战,我们引入了一种称为噪声报告细化(NRR)的新任务,它可以从噪声自由文本中生成放射学报告。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一个报告优化管道,该管道利用大型语言模型(llm),通过引导自我批评和报告选择策略进行增强。为了解决现有放射学报告生成指标在测量NRR任务中各种报告模式的清洁度、放射有用性和事实正确性方面的无能,我们引入了一个新的基准,NRRBench,用于NRR评估。该基准包括两个在线数据源数据集和四个临床可解释的基于法学硕士的指标:两个指标分别评估放射学实体和模式特定模板属性的匹配率,一个指标评估报告清洁度,一个综合指标评估总体NRR表现。实验表明,引导性自我批评和报告选择策略显著提高了精炼报告的质量。此外,我们提出的指标显示,在评估NRR时,与放射学报告生成指标相比,报告的噪声率和错误率的相关性要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1151
期刊介绍: IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics publishes original papers presenting recent advances where information and communication technologies intersect with health, healthcare, life sciences, and biomedicine. Topics include acquisition, transmission, storage, retrieval, management, and analysis of biomedical and health information. The journal covers applications of information technologies in healthcare, patient monitoring, preventive care, early disease diagnosis, therapy discovery, and personalized treatment protocols. It explores electronic medical and health records, clinical information systems, decision support systems, medical and biological imaging informatics, wearable systems, body area/sensor networks, and more. Integration-related topics like interoperability, evidence-based medicine, and secure patient data are also addressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信