Relationship of blood flow, angioarchitecture, and rupture in cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Laura Stone McGuire, Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Peter Theiss, Jessica Hossa, Mpuekela Tshibangu, Adrusht Madapoosi, Fady T Charbel, Ali Alaraj
{"title":"Relationship of blood flow, angioarchitecture, and rupture in cerebral arteriovenous malformations.","authors":"Laura Stone McGuire, Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Peter Theiss, Jessica Hossa, Mpuekela Tshibangu, Adrusht Madapoosi, Fady T Charbel, Ali Alaraj","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.JNS241975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have a 2%-4% annual risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Understanding hemorrhage risk is crucial for determining appropriate treatment. The degree to which cerebral blood flow within AVMs interplays with angioarchitecture and contributes to potential rupture represents an active area of research. Prior studies have shown conflicting results; those based on quantitative MR angiography (QMRA) have found lower flow associated with hemorrhage, while those using angiography-determined transit time associated higher flow with rupture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively collected institutional database of 647 adult patients with cerebral AVMs (1995-2023) was queried. Patients with baseline QMRA studies were included in the analysis. Patient characteristics, angioarchitectural information, and hemodynamic data were collected for each patient and compared between those who presented with and those who presented without hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 171 patients met the inclusion criteria; 105 patients had unruptured AVMs and 66 had ruptured AVMs at presentation. The mean age did not differ between groups (39.4 years vs 39.9 years), but there was male predominance in the rupture group (67.7%, p = 0.023). A deep AVM location was more likely in those with rupture (p = 0.002). The mean calculated AVM flow was lower in the rupture group (284.3 mL/min vs 401.8 mL/min, p = 0.013). Additionally, the mean AVM volume was smaller in the rupture group (8.8 cm3 vs 14.5 cm3, p = 0.040). The mean number of arterial feeders did not differ between groups (2.4 vs 2.4, p = 0.986), but the mean size of the largest feeder was smaller in those presenting with hemorrhage (2.6 vs 3.0 mm, p = 0.038). Furthermore, ruptured AVMs were more likely to have deep venous drainage (p = 0.007) and fewer draining veins (mean 1.9 vs 2.4, p = 0.020) than unruptured AVMs. The presence of feeder aneurysms, intranidal aneurysms, and nidal compactness did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with baseline QMRA studies who presented with ruptured AVMs were noted to have a deep location, deep venous drainage, lower flow, smaller nidal volume, smaller arterial feeders, and fewer draining veins compared with those with unruptured AVMs. These findings validate results from smaller prior studies based on QMRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.JNS241975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have a 2%-4% annual risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Understanding hemorrhage risk is crucial for determining appropriate treatment. The degree to which cerebral blood flow within AVMs interplays with angioarchitecture and contributes to potential rupture represents an active area of research. Prior studies have shown conflicting results; those based on quantitative MR angiography (QMRA) have found lower flow associated with hemorrhage, while those using angiography-determined transit time associated higher flow with rupture.

Methods: A prospectively collected institutional database of 647 adult patients with cerebral AVMs (1995-2023) was queried. Patients with baseline QMRA studies were included in the analysis. Patient characteristics, angioarchitectural information, and hemodynamic data were collected for each patient and compared between those who presented with and those who presented without hemorrhage.

Results: A total of 171 patients met the inclusion criteria; 105 patients had unruptured AVMs and 66 had ruptured AVMs at presentation. The mean age did not differ between groups (39.4 years vs 39.9 years), but there was male predominance in the rupture group (67.7%, p = 0.023). A deep AVM location was more likely in those with rupture (p = 0.002). The mean calculated AVM flow was lower in the rupture group (284.3 mL/min vs 401.8 mL/min, p = 0.013). Additionally, the mean AVM volume was smaller in the rupture group (8.8 cm3 vs 14.5 cm3, p = 0.040). The mean number of arterial feeders did not differ between groups (2.4 vs 2.4, p = 0.986), but the mean size of the largest feeder was smaller in those presenting with hemorrhage (2.6 vs 3.0 mm, p = 0.038). Furthermore, ruptured AVMs were more likely to have deep venous drainage (p = 0.007) and fewer draining veins (mean 1.9 vs 2.4, p = 0.020) than unruptured AVMs. The presence of feeder aneurysms, intranidal aneurysms, and nidal compactness did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Patients with baseline QMRA studies who presented with ruptured AVMs were noted to have a deep location, deep venous drainage, lower flow, smaller nidal volume, smaller arterial feeders, and fewer draining veins compared with those with unruptured AVMs. These findings validate results from smaller prior studies based on QMRA.

脑动静脉畸形的血流、血管结构与破裂的关系。
目的:脑动静脉畸形(AVMs)每年有2%-4%的颅内出血风险。了解出血风险对于确定适当的治疗是至关重要的。脑血流在多大程度上与血管结构相互作用并导致潜在的血管破裂是一个活跃的研究领域。之前的研究显示了相互矛盾的结果;那些基于定量磁共振血管造影(QMRA)的研究发现低流量与出血有关,而那些使用血管造影确定的传递时间的研究发现高流量与破裂有关。方法:对1995-2023年647例成年脑动静脉畸形患者的机构数据库进行前瞻性查询。基线QMRA研究的患者被纳入分析。收集每位患者的特征、血管建筑学信息和血流动力学数据,并将有出血和无出血的患者进行比较。结果:171例患者符合纳入标准;105例患者在就诊时avm未破裂,66例avm破裂。平均年龄各组间无差异(39.4岁vs 39.9岁),但破裂组男性居多(67.7%,p = 0.023)。AVM破裂的患者更可能位于AVM深部(p = 0.002)。破裂组平均计算AVM流量较低(284.3 mL/min vs 401.8 mL/min, p = 0.013)。此外,破裂组的平均AVM体积更小(8.8 cm3 vs 14.5 cm3, p = 0.040)。动脉喂食器的平均数量在两组之间没有差异(2.4 vs 2.4, p = 0.986),但在出现出血的患者中,最大喂食器的平均尺寸较小(2.6 vs 3.0 mm, p = 0.038)。此外,与未破裂的avm相比,破裂的avm更有可能有深静脉引流(p = 0.007)和更少的引流静脉(平均1.9 vs 2.4, p = 0.020)。两组间供体动脉瘤、膜内动脉瘤和针膜紧密度无差异。结论:与未破裂的avm相比,基线QMRA研究中出现avm破裂的患者具有深位置、深静脉引流、较低流量、较小的网状体积、较小的动脉喂食器和较少的引流静脉。这些发现验证了基于QMRA的小型先前研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信