Comprehensive plan quality assessment of simplified volumetric-modulated arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1007/s12194-025-00907-0
Yuya Tatsuno, Naritoshi Mukumoto, Tomoya Ishida, Yasuyuki Shimizu, Yoshihiko Yamamoto, Satoshi Seno, Takeaki Ishihara, Daisuke Miyawaki, Ryohei Sasaki
{"title":"Comprehensive plan quality assessment of simplified volumetric-modulated arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.","authors":"Yuya Tatsuno, Naritoshi Mukumoto, Tomoya Ishida, Yasuyuki Shimizu, Yoshihiko Yamamoto, Satoshi Seno, Takeaki Ishihara, Daisuke Miyawaki, Ryohei Sasaki","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00907-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, optimizing plan quality, including dosimetric quality and plan complexity, is paramount for mitigating adverse effects and enhancing dose delivery accuracy. This study evaluated the plan quality of dynamic conformal arc-based volumetric-modulated arc therapy (d-VMAT) as a simplified VMAT compared to conventional VMAT (c-VMAT) across various prescription isodose lines (PIL) and planning target volume (PTV) sizes. Twenty inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed (PTV: 7.6-68.7 cm<sup>3</sup>). The prescribed dose comprised 48 Gy delivered in four fractions, encompassing 95% of the PTV, with the PIL ranging from 60 to 90% in 10% increments, using a 6X-flattening filter-free beam. The d-VMAT and c-VMAT plans were generated for each patient and PIL setting. Dose indices, including the conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and plan complexity, were assessed for each plan. The GI of d-VMAT closely mirrored that of c-VMAT at 60% and 70% PIL. Nevertheless, d-VMAT exhibited significantly higher GI values than c-VMAT at 80% and 90% PIL, particularly for smaller PTV sizes. Notably, d-VMAT demonstrated reduced plan complexity across all PIL compared to c-VMAT. Clinically, significant differences in CI and dose coverage between d-VMAT and c-VMAT were not observed across varying PIL settings in the range of 60-80%. The dose to the organs at risk with d-VMAT was comparable to that with c-VMAT, except at 90% PIL. In conclusion, the simplification of VMAT treatment plan using d-VMAT demonstrates superior plan quality across various PTV sizes at 60% and 70% PIL.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"547-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00907-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lung stereotactic body radiation therapy, optimizing plan quality, including dosimetric quality and plan complexity, is paramount for mitigating adverse effects and enhancing dose delivery accuracy. This study evaluated the plan quality of dynamic conformal arc-based volumetric-modulated arc therapy (d-VMAT) as a simplified VMAT compared to conventional VMAT (c-VMAT) across various prescription isodose lines (PIL) and planning target volume (PTV) sizes. Twenty inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed (PTV: 7.6-68.7 cm3). The prescribed dose comprised 48 Gy delivered in four fractions, encompassing 95% of the PTV, with the PIL ranging from 60 to 90% in 10% increments, using a 6X-flattening filter-free beam. The d-VMAT and c-VMAT plans were generated for each patient and PIL setting. Dose indices, including the conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and plan complexity, were assessed for each plan. The GI of d-VMAT closely mirrored that of c-VMAT at 60% and 70% PIL. Nevertheless, d-VMAT exhibited significantly higher GI values than c-VMAT at 80% and 90% PIL, particularly for smaller PTV sizes. Notably, d-VMAT demonstrated reduced plan complexity across all PIL compared to c-VMAT. Clinically, significant differences in CI and dose coverage between d-VMAT and c-VMAT were not observed across varying PIL settings in the range of 60-80%. The dose to the organs at risk with d-VMAT was comparable to that with c-VMAT, except at 90% PIL. In conclusion, the simplification of VMAT treatment plan using d-VMAT demonstrates superior plan quality across various PTV sizes at 60% and 70% PIL.

肺立体定向放射治疗中简化体积调制弧线治疗的综合方案质量评价。
在肺立体定向全身放射治疗中,优化计划质量,包括剂量学质量和计划复杂性,对于减轻不良反应和提高剂量传递准确性至关重要。本研究评估了动态适形电弧体积调节电弧治疗(d-VMAT)作为一种简化的VMAT与传统VMAT (c-VMAT)在不同处方等剂量线(PIL)和计划靶体积(PTV)大小上的计划质量。回顾性分析20例不能手术的非小细胞肺癌患者(PTV: 7.6 ~ 68.7 cm3)。处方剂量包括48 Gy,分四部分递送,包括95%的PTV, PIL范围为60%至90%,以10%的增量,使用6x平坦无滤波器光束。为每位患者和PIL设置生成d-VMAT和c-VMAT计划。评估各方案的剂量指标,包括符合性指数(CI)、梯度指数(GI)和方案复杂性。在60%和70% PIL时,d-VMAT的GI与c-VMAT非常接近。然而,在80%和90%的PIL情况下,d-VMAT的GI值明显高于c-VMAT,特别是在较小的PTV尺寸下。值得注意的是,与c-VMAT相比,d-VMAT在所有PIL中显示出更低的计划复杂性。临床上,在60-80%的不同PIL设置范围内,d-VMAT和c-VMAT之间的CI和剂量覆盖率未观察到显着差异。除90% PIL外,d-VMAT对有危险器官的剂量与c-VMAT相当。综上所述,使用d-VMAT简化VMAT治疗计划在60%和70% PIL时,在不同PTV尺寸下显示出优越的计划质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信