The importance of multiculturalism in medical education: a global comparison of perspectives from medical and health professions students at 21 universities.

JRSM Open Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/20542704251322244
Anette Wu, Radhika Patel, Jason Luong, Sean McWatt, Rahul Goel, Cecilia Brassett, Jane Dutton, Mandeep Gill Sagoo, Carol Kunzel, Alexander Green, Geoffroy Noel
{"title":"The importance of multiculturalism in medical education: a global comparison of perspectives from medical and health professions students at 21 universities.","authors":"Anette Wu, Radhika Patel, Jason Luong, Sean McWatt, Rahul Goel, Cecilia Brassett, Jane Dutton, Mandeep Gill Sagoo, Carol Kunzel, Alexander Green, Geoffroy Noel","doi":"10.1177/20542704251322244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to quantitatively assess the baseline level of self-perceived cultural competency preparedness and skillfulness among medical and health professions students from 21 universities around the world utilizing a previously validated and standardized testing tool.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The International Collaboration and Exchange Program (ICEP), a global exchange initiative for junior medical and health professions students spanning 21 universities across four continents.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 753 students from the 2021 and 2022 ICEP cohorts.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Students self-evaluated their cultural competency skills on a 5-point Likert-type scale encompassing different areas of competency. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify contributors to cultural competency levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon rating how skillful they are at interacting with culturally diverse patients, North American students reported the highest scores with a mean of 3.22, while Australian students showed the lowest score of 2.82. When analyzing students' stages of study, those in clinical years of medical schools scored the highest at 3.29. Significant variations were observed in the cultural competency self-rating scores among students based on their respective regions (<i>p </i>< .005) and program types/stages (<i>p</i> < .05). Notably, students in their clinical years of school consistently rated themselves higher compared to their preclinical counterparts (<i>p</i> < .05). Furthermore, students from Europe displayed elevated self-ratings compared to the other regions (<i>p</i> < .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though these participants represent a highly motivated subgroup of students, potentially limiting result generalizability, the findings emphasize that regional differences exist. Given the multifaceted nature of cultural competency, the results suggest that factors such as educational stage, age, and region may influence students' perceived competency levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":"16 4","pages":"20542704251322244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704251322244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to quantitatively assess the baseline level of self-perceived cultural competency preparedness and skillfulness among medical and health professions students from 21 universities around the world utilizing a previously validated and standardized testing tool.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: The International Collaboration and Exchange Program (ICEP), a global exchange initiative for junior medical and health professions students spanning 21 universities across four continents.

Participants: A total of 753 students from the 2021 and 2022 ICEP cohorts.

Main outcome measures: Students self-evaluated their cultural competency skills on a 5-point Likert-type scale encompassing different areas of competency. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify contributors to cultural competency levels.

Results: Upon rating how skillful they are at interacting with culturally diverse patients, North American students reported the highest scores with a mean of 3.22, while Australian students showed the lowest score of 2.82. When analyzing students' stages of study, those in clinical years of medical schools scored the highest at 3.29. Significant variations were observed in the cultural competency self-rating scores among students based on their respective regions (p < .005) and program types/stages (p < .05). Notably, students in their clinical years of school consistently rated themselves higher compared to their preclinical counterparts (p < .05). Furthermore, students from Europe displayed elevated self-ratings compared to the other regions (p < .005).

Conclusions: Though these participants represent a highly motivated subgroup of students, potentially limiting result generalizability, the findings emphasize that regional differences exist. Given the multifaceted nature of cultural competency, the results suggest that factors such as educational stage, age, and region may influence students' perceived competency levels.

多元文化在医学教育中的重要性:21所大学医学和卫生专业学生观点的全球比较。
目的:本研究旨在利用一种经过验证的标准化测试工具,定量评估来自全球21所大学的医学和卫生专业学生自我感知的文化能力准备和技能的基线水平。设计:横断面研究。背景:国际合作与交流计划(ICEP)是一项面向四大洲21所大学的初级医学和卫生专业学生的全球交流倡议。参与者:共有753名来自2021年和2022年ICEP组的学生。主要结果测量:学生在包括不同能力领域的5分李克特式量表上自我评估他们的文化能力技能。采用多元线性回归来确定文化能力水平的贡献者。结果:在评估他们与不同文化的病人互动的技巧时,北美学生的平均得分最高,为3.22分,而澳大利亚学生的平均得分最低,为2.82分。在分析学生的学习阶段时,医学院临床年级的学生得分最高,为3.29分。结论:虽然这些参与者代表了一个高度积极的学生亚群,但可能限制了结果的普遍性,但研究结果强调了区域差异的存在。鉴于文化能力的多面性,研究结果表明,教育阶段、年龄和地区等因素可能影响学生的感知能力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信