Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Chinese Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: a Randomised Controlled Phase 3 Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Junfen Fu, Xinran Cheng, Michael Højby, Chunxiu Gong, Tina Lund Leunbach, Yanhong Li, Haiyan Wei, Yu Zhu, Yining Zhang, Yan Zhong
{"title":"Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Chinese Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: a Randomised Controlled Phase 3 Study.","authors":"Junfen Fu, Xinran Cheng, Michael Højby, Chunxiu Gong, Tina Lund Leunbach, Yanhong Li, Haiyan Wei, Yu Zhu, Yining Zhang, Yan Zhong","doi":"10.1159/000545786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>REAL6 is a randomized, multi-centre, open-labelled, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial (NCT04970654) investigating once-weekly somapacitan, a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative, in Chinese children with GH deficiency (GHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>110 treatment-naïve patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (Norditropin®; 0.034 mg/kg/day) for 52 weeks. Annualized height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 52 was the primary measurement. Additional assessments included HV standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF¬ I) SDS, and observer-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated mean HV at week 52 was 11.0 and 10.4 cm/year for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Non-inferiority of somapacitan compared to daily GH was confirmed. Changes in HVSDS, height SDS, bone age, and IGF-I SDS from baseline to week 52 were similar between groups. At week 52, mean (SD) IGF-I SDS was within intended reference range (-2.0 to +2.0) and comparable between groups: +0.5 (1.4) for somapacitan versus +0.1 (1.2) for daily GH. Somapacitan was well-tolerated with a safety profile consistent with the well-known safety profile of daily GH. A low proportion of injection-site reactions were reported for somapacitan (2.7%), with no reports of injection-site pain during the 52-week treatment period. Disease burden was reduced from baseline to week 52 for both treatments. Somapacitan reduced treatment burden compared to daily GH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Efficacy and safety profiles were comparable for Chinese children with GHD treated with somapacitan or daily GH. Both treatments similarly reduced disease burden, while treatment burden was reduced with somapacitan.</p>","PeriodicalId":13025,"journal":{"name":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: REAL6 is a randomized, multi-centre, open-labelled, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial (NCT04970654) investigating once-weekly somapacitan, a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative, in Chinese children with GH deficiency (GHD).

Methods: 110 treatment-naïve patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/week) or daily GH (Norditropin®; 0.034 mg/kg/day) for 52 weeks. Annualized height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 52 was the primary measurement. Additional assessments included HV standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF¬ I) SDS, and observer-reported outcomes.

Results: Estimated mean HV at week 52 was 11.0 and 10.4 cm/year for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Non-inferiority of somapacitan compared to daily GH was confirmed. Changes in HVSDS, height SDS, bone age, and IGF-I SDS from baseline to week 52 were similar between groups. At week 52, mean (SD) IGF-I SDS was within intended reference range (-2.0 to +2.0) and comparable between groups: +0.5 (1.4) for somapacitan versus +0.1 (1.2) for daily GH. Somapacitan was well-tolerated with a safety profile consistent with the well-known safety profile of daily GH. A low proportion of injection-site reactions were reported for somapacitan (2.7%), with no reports of injection-site pain during the 52-week treatment period. Disease burden was reduced from baseline to week 52 for both treatments. Somapacitan reduced treatment burden compared to daily GH.

Conclusions: Efficacy and safety profiles were comparable for Chinese children with GHD treated with somapacitan or daily GH. Both treatments similarly reduced disease burden, while treatment burden was reduced with somapacitan.

Somapacitan对中国生长激素缺乏症儿童有效且耐受性良好:一项随机对照3期研究
REAL6是一项随机、多中心、开放标记、主动对照的平行组3期试验(NCT04970654),研究每周一次的somapacitan(一种可逆的白蛋白结合生长激素(GH)衍生物)在中国GH缺乏症(GHD)儿童中的作用。方法:110例treatment-naïve患者按2:1随机分配至somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/week)或每日GH (Norditropin®;0.034 mg/kg/天),持续52周。年化高度速度(HV;Cm /年)是第52周的主要测量值。其他评估包括HV标准差评分(SDS)、身高SDS、骨龄、胰岛素样生长因子- 1 (IGF -I) SDS和观察者报告的结果。结果:在第52周,somapacitan和daily GH的估计平均HV分别为11.0和10.4 cm/年。证实了somapacitan与每日GH的非劣效性。两组间HVSDS、身高SDS、骨龄和IGF-I SDS从基线到第52周的变化相似。在第52周,平均(SD) IGF-I SDS在预期参考范围内(-2.0至+2.0),各组之间具有可比性:somapacitan组+0.5(1.4),而每日GH组+0.1(1.2)。Somapacitan耐受性良好,其安全性与众所周知的每日生长激素的安全性一致。据报道,somapacitan的注射部位反应比例较低(2.7%),在52周的治疗期间没有出现注射部位疼痛的报告。两种治疗的疾病负担从基线到第52周均有所减少。与每日GH相比,Somapacitan减轻了治疗负担。结论:用somapacitan或每日生长激素治疗中国儿童GHD的疗效和安全性相当。两种治疗方法同样减轻了疾病负担,而somapacitan则减轻了治疗负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hormone Research in Paediatrics
Hormone Research in Paediatrics ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of ''Hormone Research in Paediatrics'' is to improve the care of children with endocrine disorders by promoting basic and clinical knowledge. The journal facilitates the dissemination of information through original papers, mini reviews, clinical guidelines and papers on novel insights from clinical practice. Periodic editorials from outstanding paediatric endocrinologists address the main published novelties by critically reviewing the major strengths and weaknesses of the studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信