Diagnostic injections are predictive of similar improvements following total hip arthroplasty in patients with radiologically mild osteoarthritis.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jamil S Kendall, Enrico M Forlenza, Daniel Shinn, Anne DeBenedetti, Aditya Yadav, Scott M Sporer
{"title":"Diagnostic injections are predictive of similar improvements following total hip arthroplasty in patients with radiologically mild osteoarthritis.","authors":"Jamil S Kendall, Enrico M Forlenza, Daniel Shinn, Anne DeBenedetti, Aditya Yadav, Scott M Sporer","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2024-0239.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Intra-articular (IA) injections are a useful diagnostic tool in patients presenting with debilitating hip pain but radiologically mild osteoarthritis (OA). We aim to explore the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) associated with patients who have radiologically mild OA and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) after an IA injection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary, elective THA at a single centre between January 2017 and December 2023 were identified. Only those patients who underwent an IA injection into the operative hip within one year of surgery were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the severity of their OA: those with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I to II arthritis were classified as 'mild', whereas those with KL grade III to IV arthritis were classified as 'severe'. Clinical outcomes and PROs, including the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement, the Harris Hip Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey Mental and Physical subscales were compared between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohorts included 25 and 225 patients with radiologically mild and severe OA, respectively. There were no baseline differences in age, sex, or time between IA injection and THA between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the preoperative or postoperative PRO values between patients with mild or severe arthritis (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the change in PRO scores from the preoperative to final follow-up, or the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference on any of the PROs between cohorts. There were also no significant differences in the studied complications between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with radiologically mild OA who feel relief of their hip pain following an IA injection report similar preoperative debility and postoperative improvements in PROs following THA compared with patients with radiologically severe OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 5 Supple A","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2024-0239.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Intra-articular (IA) injections are a useful diagnostic tool in patients presenting with debilitating hip pain but radiologically mild osteoarthritis (OA). We aim to explore the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) associated with patients who have radiologically mild OA and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) after an IA injection.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary, elective THA at a single centre between January 2017 and December 2023 were identified. Only those patients who underwent an IA injection into the operative hip within one year of surgery were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the severity of their OA: those with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I to II arthritis were classified as 'mild', whereas those with KL grade III to IV arthritis were classified as 'severe'. Clinical outcomes and PROs, including the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement, the Harris Hip Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey Mental and Physical subscales were compared between cohorts.

Results: The final cohorts included 25 and 225 patients with radiologically mild and severe OA, respectively. There were no baseline differences in age, sex, or time between IA injection and THA between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the preoperative or postoperative PRO values between patients with mild or severe arthritis (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the change in PRO scores from the preoperative to final follow-up, or the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference on any of the PROs between cohorts. There were also no significant differences in the studied complications between groups.

Conclusion: Patients with radiologically mild OA who feel relief of their hip pain following an IA injection report similar preoperative debility and postoperative improvements in PROs following THA compared with patients with radiologically severe OA.

诊断性注射可预测放射学轻度骨关节炎患者全髋关节置换术后类似的改善。
目的:关节内注射(IA)是一种有用的诊断工具,用于表现为衰弱性髋关节疼痛但放射学上轻度骨关节炎(OA)的患者。我们的目的是探讨放射学上轻度OA患者在注射IA后接受全髋关节置换术(THA)的临床和患者报告的结果(PROs)。方法:选取2017年1月至2023年12月在单一中心接受原发性选择性THA手术的患者。仅包括那些在手术一年内向手术髋关节注射IA的患者。根据骨性关节炎的严重程度,将患者分为两组:Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) I至II级关节炎患者被归类为“轻度”,而KL III至IV级关节炎患者被归类为“重度”。临床结果和PROs,包括髋关节残疾和关节置换术骨关节炎结局评分、Harris髋关节评分、单一评估数字评估和退伍军人兰德12项健康调查心理和身体亚量表在队列之间进行比较。结果:最终的队列分别包括25名和225名放射学上轻度和重度OA患者。在队列之间,注射IA和THA在年龄、性别或时间上没有基线差异。轻、重度关节炎患者术前、术后PRO值差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。从术前到最终随访,PRO评分的变化没有显著差异,队列之间在任何PRO上达到最小临床重要差异的患者百分比也没有显著差异。两组间所研究的并发症也无显著差异。结论:与放射学上严重的OA患者相比,放射学上轻度OA患者在注射IA后髋关节疼痛得到缓解,报告THA术后pro的术前衰弱和术后改善相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信