How to Choose Treatment Regimens for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Patients with PLA2R-Negative: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 6.2 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
ImmunoTargets and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ITT.S512451
Zijian Zhou, Yijing Zou, Ben Ke, Wen Shen
{"title":"How to Choose Treatment Regimens for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Patients with PLA2R-Negative: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Zijian Zhou, Yijing Zou, Ben Ke, Wen Shen","doi":"10.2147/ITT.S512451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and rituximab (RTX) are first-line treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), regardless of PLA2R status. While the efficacy of RTX in IMN patients with PLA2R-positive has been well-documented, its effectiveness in IMN patients with PLA2R-negative remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of these three treatment regimens in IMN patients with PLA2R-negative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 46 PLA2R-negative IMN patients confirmed by renal biopsy and immunofluorescence from the Department of Nephrology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between September 2021 and October 2023. We compared clinical remission rates, and side effects at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up in 14 patients who received prednisolone combined with cyclophosphamide (cyclophosphamide group), in 11 patients who treated with prednisolone combined with tacrolimus (tacrolimus group), and 21 patients who treated with rituximab (RTX group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar among the three groups. At the 12-month follow-up, the complete response rate was significantly higher in the cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus groups compared to the RTX group (<i>p</i> = 0.029). However, there were no significant differences in cumulative complete remission rates or cumulative composite remission rates among the three groups during the follow-up period (<i>p</i> = 0.192, <i>p</i> = 0.212). Severe adverse events occurred in all groups, but the differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus appear to offer long-term benefits for PLA2R-negative IMN patients, with tacrolimus demonstrating superior efficacy among the treatment options evaluated. These insights offer important guidance for clinical decision-making in the management of PLA2R-negative IMN. However, further large-scale, multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":30986,"journal":{"name":"ImmunoTargets and Therapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"515-522"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ImmunoTargets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S512451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and rituximab (RTX) are first-line treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), regardless of PLA2R status. While the efficacy of RTX in IMN patients with PLA2R-positive has been well-documented, its effectiveness in IMN patients with PLA2R-negative remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of these three treatment regimens in IMN patients with PLA2R-negative.

Methods: This study included 46 PLA2R-negative IMN patients confirmed by renal biopsy and immunofluorescence from the Department of Nephrology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between September 2021 and October 2023. We compared clinical remission rates, and side effects at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up in 14 patients who received prednisolone combined with cyclophosphamide (cyclophosphamide group), in 11 patients who treated with prednisolone combined with tacrolimus (tacrolimus group), and 21 patients who treated with rituximab (RTX group).

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among the three groups. At the 12-month follow-up, the complete response rate was significantly higher in the cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus groups compared to the RTX group (p = 0.029). However, there were no significant differences in cumulative complete remission rates or cumulative composite remission rates among the three groups during the follow-up period (p = 0.192, p = 0.212). Severe adverse events occurred in all groups, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus appear to offer long-term benefits for PLA2R-negative IMN patients, with tacrolimus demonstrating superior efficacy among the treatment options evaluated. These insights offer important guidance for clinical decision-making in the management of PLA2R-negative IMN. However, further large-scale, multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm these findings.

pla2r阴性特发性膜性肾病患者如何选择治疗方案:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
背景:环磷酰胺、他克莫司和利妥昔单抗(RTX)是特发性膜性肾病(IMN)的一线治疗药物,与PLA2R状态无关。虽然RTX对pla2r阳性IMN患者的疗效已得到充分证实,但其对pla2r阴性IMN患者的有效性仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评价这三种治疗方案在pla2r阴性IMN患者中的疗效和不良事件。方法:本研究纳入了2021年9月至2023年10月南昌大学第二附属医院肾内科经肾活检和免疫荧光证实的pla2r阴性IMN患者46例。我们比较了14例强的松龙联合环磷酰胺组(环磷酰胺组)、11例强的松龙联合他克莫司组(他克莫司组)和21例利妥昔单抗组(RTX组)在3、6和12个月随访时的临床缓解率和副作用。结果:三组患者的基线特征相似。在12个月的随访中,环磷酰胺组和他克莫司组的完全缓解率明显高于RTX组(p = 0.029)。然而,在随访期间,三组患者的累积完全缓解率或累积综合缓解率无显著差异(p = 0.192, p = 0.212)。各组患者均发生严重不良事件,但差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:环磷酰胺和他克莫司似乎为pla2r阴性IMN患者提供了长期益处,他克莫司在评估的治疗方案中表现出更优的疗效。这些见解为pla2r阴性IMN管理的临床决策提供了重要指导。然而,需要进一步的大规模、多中心的长期随访研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Immuno Targets and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on the immunological basis of diseases, potential targets for immune based therapy and treatment protocols employed to improve patient management. Basic immunology and physiology of the immune system in health, and disease will be also covered.In addition, the journal will focus on the impact of management programs and new therapeutic agents and protocols on patient perspectives such as quality of life, adherence and satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信