Impact of lymph-node dissection during radical cystectomy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Japanese multicenter retrospective study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tomokazu Sazuka, Rikiya Taoka, Jun Miki, Ryoichi Saito, Wataru Fukuokaya, Yoshiyuki Matsui, Shingo Hatakeyama, Takashi Kawahara, Ayumu Matsuda, Taketo Kawai, Minoru Kato, Takeshi Sano, Fumihiko Urabe, Soki Kashima, Hirohito Naito, Yoji Murakami, Makito Miyake, Kei Daizumoto, Yuto Matsushita, Takuji Hayashi, Junichi Inokuchi, Yusuke Sugino, Kenichiro Shiga, Noriya Yamaguchi, Shingo Yamamoto, Keiji Yasue, Takashige Abe, Shotaro Nakanishi, Katsuyoshi Hashine, Atsuro Sawada, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Shuichi Tatarano, Koichiro Wada, Sho Sekito, Ryo Maruyama, Naotaka Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Hiroshi Kitamura, Tomohiko Ichikawa
{"title":"Impact of lymph-node dissection during radical cystectomy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Japanese multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Tomokazu Sazuka, Rikiya Taoka, Jun Miki, Ryoichi Saito, Wataru Fukuokaya, Yoshiyuki Matsui, Shingo Hatakeyama, Takashi Kawahara, Ayumu Matsuda, Taketo Kawai, Minoru Kato, Takeshi Sano, Fumihiko Urabe, Soki Kashima, Hirohito Naito, Yoji Murakami, Makito Miyake, Kei Daizumoto, Yuto Matsushita, Takuji Hayashi, Junichi Inokuchi, Yusuke Sugino, Kenichiro Shiga, Noriya Yamaguchi, Shingo Yamamoto, Keiji Yasue, Takashige Abe, Shotaro Nakanishi, Katsuyoshi Hashine, Atsuro Sawada, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Shuichi Tatarano, Koichiro Wada, Sho Sekito, Ryo Maruyama, Naotaka Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Hiroshi Kitamura, Tomohiko Ichikawa","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02778-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no definitive consensus on the necessity and impact of lymph-node dissection during radical cystectomy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of lymph-node dissection in NMIBC and identify preoperative factors influencing non-urinary tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data for 2674 cases of bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy between January 2013 and December 2019 from a multicenter Japanese database; 410 patients were preoperatively diagnosed with NMIBC. Patients were divided into lymph-node dissection and non-lymph-node dissection groups, and NUTRFS and overall survival were compared as endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine NUTRFS prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lymph-node dissection was performed in 374/410 patients and not in 36/410. Compared with the lymph-node dissection group, the non-lymph-node dissection group was older, and had a lower proportion of a performance status of 0 and a higher proportion of clinical stage < T1 disease. The pathological lymph-node positivity rate in the lymph-node dissection group was 6.9%. However, lymph-node dissection did not provide a statistically significant prolonged survival. Results remained consistent after propensity score matching. Multivariate analysis revealed poor performance status and bladder neck tumors as independent risk factors for NUTRFS. Lymph-node dissection was not a significant prognostic factor in preoperatively diagnosed NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine lymph-node dissection may be unnecessary for all NMIBC cases; however, our findings suggest that this should be considered for NMIBC involving the bladder neck.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1417-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02778-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no definitive consensus on the necessity and impact of lymph-node dissection during radical cystectomy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of lymph-node dissection in NMIBC and identify preoperative factors influencing non-urinary tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 2674 cases of bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy between January 2013 and December 2019 from a multicenter Japanese database; 410 patients were preoperatively diagnosed with NMIBC. Patients were divided into lymph-node dissection and non-lymph-node dissection groups, and NUTRFS and overall survival were compared as endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine NUTRFS prognostic factors.

Results: Lymph-node dissection was performed in 374/410 patients and not in 36/410. Compared with the lymph-node dissection group, the non-lymph-node dissection group was older, and had a lower proportion of a performance status of 0 and a higher proportion of clinical stage < T1 disease. The pathological lymph-node positivity rate in the lymph-node dissection group was 6.9%. However, lymph-node dissection did not provide a statistically significant prolonged survival. Results remained consistent after propensity score matching. Multivariate analysis revealed poor performance status and bladder neck tumors as independent risk factors for NUTRFS. Lymph-node dissection was not a significant prognostic factor in preoperatively diagnosed NMIBC.

Conclusions: Routine lymph-node dissection may be unnecessary for all NMIBC cases; however, our findings suggest that this should be considered for NMIBC involving the bladder neck.

非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术中淋巴结清扫的影响:日本多中心回顾性研究。
背景:对于非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)根治性膀胱切除术中淋巴结清扫的必要性和影响,目前还没有明确的共识。本研究旨在评估淋巴结清扫在NMIBC中的预后意义,并确定影响非尿路无复发生存(NUTRFS)的术前因素。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月至2019年12月来自日本多中心数据库的2674例膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术患者的数据;410例患者术前诊断为NMIBC。将患者分为淋巴结清扫组和非淋巴结清扫组,以NUTRFS和总生存期为终点。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定NUTRFS预后因素。结果:374/410例患者行淋巴结清扫,36/410例未行淋巴结清扫。与淋巴结清扫组相比,非淋巴结清扫组年龄较大,表现状态为0的比例较低,临床分期< T1的比例较高。淋巴结清扫组病理淋巴结阳性率为6.9%。然而,淋巴结清扫并没有提供统计学上显著的延长生存率。倾向评分匹配后结果保持一致。多因素分析显示,表现不佳和膀胱颈部肿瘤是NUTRFS的独立危险因素。淋巴结清扫在术前诊断的NMIBC中不是一个重要的预后因素。结论:对于所有NMIBC病例,常规淋巴结清扫可能是不必要的;然而,我们的研究结果表明,对于涉及膀胱颈部的NMIBC应该考虑这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信