Changes in abortion access after implementation of Medicaid coverage in Illinois: a retrospective analysis.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001966
Carmela Zuniga, Valeria Hernandez, Debra Stulberg, Lee Hasselbacher, Ashley McHugh, Danielle Young, Hanz Dismer, Terri-Ann Thompson
{"title":"Changes in abortion access after implementation of Medicaid coverage in Illinois: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Carmela Zuniga, Valeria Hernandez, Debra Stulberg, Lee Hasselbacher, Ashley McHugh, Danielle Young, Hanz Dismer, Terri-Ann Thompson","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2018, Illinois implemented House Bill 40 (HB-40), allowing state funds to provide Medicaid coverage for abortion. This study aimed to quantitatively measure changes in access among Illinois residents after the law's implementation, with a focus on changes experienced by Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis using 67 462 abortion visits across 18 health centres comparing service delivery patterns 1 year before and 3 years after HB-40 implementation. We used a t-test and difference-in-differences regression to assess the policy's effect on mean gestational age at the time of abortion among Medicaid patients and non-Medicaid patients. We used χ<sup>2</sup> tests to capture differences in insurance type used for payment, as well as differences between Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients in presenting at ≤11 weeks gestation, abortion method provided and time between scheduling and getting an abortion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2017 to 2020, the overall volume of abortions increased by 27% and the share of abortions paid for with Medicaid increased from 15% to 49%. Compared with non-Medicaid patients, Medicaid patients experienced a significant decrease in average gestational age at the time of abortion post-HB-40 (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.93, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.95, p<0.001). The proportion of Medicaid patients ≤11 weeks gestation increased post-HB-40 (76% to 83%; p<0.001) but did not change among non-Medicaid patients (89% to 90%; p=0.62). By 2020, the 13%-point gap that existed between the two groups in 2017 (76% and 89%) was reduced to 4 (86% and 90%). The proportion of medication abortions increased substantially for Medicaid patients post-HB-40 (27% to 46%; p<0.001) and increased slightly for non-Medicaid patients (51% to 53%; p=0.001), resulting in decreased gaps in medication abortions received between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medicaid coverage of abortion reduced insurance-related disparities for Medicaid patients, as shown by decreased gaps in average gestational age among Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients. It was also associated with increased medication abortions among Medicaid patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001966"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Introduction: In 2018, Illinois implemented House Bill 40 (HB-40), allowing state funds to provide Medicaid coverage for abortion. This study aimed to quantitatively measure changes in access among Illinois residents after the law's implementation, with a focus on changes experienced by Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using 67 462 abortion visits across 18 health centres comparing service delivery patterns 1 year before and 3 years after HB-40 implementation. We used a t-test and difference-in-differences regression to assess the policy's effect on mean gestational age at the time of abortion among Medicaid patients and non-Medicaid patients. We used χ2 tests to capture differences in insurance type used for payment, as well as differences between Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients in presenting at ≤11 weeks gestation, abortion method provided and time between scheduling and getting an abortion.

Results: From 2017 to 2020, the overall volume of abortions increased by 27% and the share of abortions paid for with Medicaid increased from 15% to 49%. Compared with non-Medicaid patients, Medicaid patients experienced a significant decrease in average gestational age at the time of abortion post-HB-40 (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=0.93, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.95, p<0.001). The proportion of Medicaid patients ≤11 weeks gestation increased post-HB-40 (76% to 83%; p<0.001) but did not change among non-Medicaid patients (89% to 90%; p=0.62). By 2020, the 13%-point gap that existed between the two groups in 2017 (76% and 89%) was reduced to 4 (86% and 90%). The proportion of medication abortions increased substantially for Medicaid patients post-HB-40 (27% to 46%; p<0.001) and increased slightly for non-Medicaid patients (51% to 53%; p=0.001), resulting in decreased gaps in medication abortions received between the two groups.

Conclusion: Medicaid coverage of abortion reduced insurance-related disparities for Medicaid patients, as shown by decreased gaps in average gestational age among Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients. It was also associated with increased medication abortions among Medicaid patients.

伊利诺斯州实施医疗补助覆盖后堕胎准入的变化:回顾性分析。
摘要:导语:2018年,伊利诺伊州实施众议院40号法案(HB-40),允许州基金为堕胎提供医疗补助。本研究旨在定量衡量法律实施后伊利诺伊州居民的访问变化,重点关注医疗补助与非医疗补助患者所经历的变化。方法:我们对18个卫生中心的67 462例堕胎就诊进行了回顾性分析,比较了HB-40实施前1年和实施后3年的服务提供模式。我们使用t检验和异差回归来评估该政策对医疗补助患者和非医疗补助患者堕胎时平均胎龄的影响。我们使用χ2检验来获取用于支付的保险类型的差异,以及医疗补助和非医疗补助患者在妊娠≤11周、提供的流产方法以及计划流产和流产之间的时间方面的差异。结果:从2017年到2020年,堕胎总量增长了27%,医疗补助支付的堕胎比例从15%上升到49%。与非医疗补助患者相比,医疗补助患者在hb -40后堕胎时的平均胎龄显著降低(发生率比(IRR)=0.93, 95% CI 0.91 ~ 0.95)。结论:医疗补助对堕胎的覆盖减少了医疗补助患者与非医疗补助患者的平均胎龄差距。它还与医疗补助患者中药物流产的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信