Risk Model for Predicting Gaps in Surgical Oncology Care Among Patients With Stage I-III Rectal Cancer From KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00480
Yoshan Moodley, Willie Brink, Jacqueline van Wyk, Shakeel Kader, Steven D Wexner, Alfred I Neugut, Ravi P Kiran
{"title":"Risk Model for Predicting Gaps in Surgical Oncology Care Among Patients With Stage I-III Rectal Cancer From KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.","authors":"Yoshan Moodley, Willie Brink, Jacqueline van Wyk, Shakeel Kader, Steven D Wexner, Alfred I Neugut, Ravi P Kiran","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Gaps in surgical oncology care (GISOC), including delayed or nonreceipt of surgery, are detrimental to cancer control. This research sought to develop a risk model for predicting GISOC in South African rectal cancer (RC) patients with localized disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from an existing colorectal cancer patient registry. GISOC was defined as surgery received >62 days after diagnosis with stage I-III RC or nonreceipt of surgery for stage I-III RC. Patient demographics, comorbidity, disease staging, and neoadjuvant therapy receipt were included as covariates in the analysis. A supervised logistic regression machine learning algorithm was used to train and test an appropriate risk model, which was translated into a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and AUC assessments were used to establish the nomogram's performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 490 patients (training data set = 245, testing data set = 245). Overall, there were 242 patients who experienced GISOC (49.4%), of whom 33 (13.6%) did not receive surgery and 209 (86.4%) had a delay in receiving surgery. The trained risk model consisted of patient race (Indian, odds ratio [OR] = 0.24; White, OR = 0.23; <i>v</i> Black), comorbidity (OR = 2.29 <i>v</i> no comorbidity), and neoadjuvant therapy receipt (OR = 18.40 <i>v</i> nonreceipt). AUCs for the risk model were >0.800.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An accurate, setting-specific risk model and nomogram was developed for predicting GISOC in patients with RC. The nomogram can be implemented without the use of technology to identify patients at high risk for GISOC, who can then be targeted with risk-reduction interventions. The impact of the nomogram on existing surgical unit workflows requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Gaps in surgical oncology care (GISOC), including delayed or nonreceipt of surgery, are detrimental to cancer control. This research sought to develop a risk model for predicting GISOC in South African rectal cancer (RC) patients with localized disease.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from an existing colorectal cancer patient registry. GISOC was defined as surgery received >62 days after diagnosis with stage I-III RC or nonreceipt of surgery for stage I-III RC. Patient demographics, comorbidity, disease staging, and neoadjuvant therapy receipt were included as covariates in the analysis. A supervised logistic regression machine learning algorithm was used to train and test an appropriate risk model, which was translated into a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and AUC assessments were used to establish the nomogram's performance.

Results: The analysis included 490 patients (training data set = 245, testing data set = 245). Overall, there were 242 patients who experienced GISOC (49.4%), of whom 33 (13.6%) did not receive surgery and 209 (86.4%) had a delay in receiving surgery. The trained risk model consisted of patient race (Indian, odds ratio [OR] = 0.24; White, OR = 0.23; v Black), comorbidity (OR = 2.29 v no comorbidity), and neoadjuvant therapy receipt (OR = 18.40 v nonreceipt). AUCs for the risk model were >0.800.

Conclusion: An accurate, setting-specific risk model and nomogram was developed for predicting GISOC in patients with RC. The nomogram can be implemented without the use of technology to identify patients at high risk for GISOC, who can then be targeted with risk-reduction interventions. The impact of the nomogram on existing surgical unit workflows requires further investigation.

预测南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省I-III期直肠癌患者肿瘤外科治疗缺口的风险模型
目的:外科肿瘤护理(GISOC)的空白,包括延迟或不接受手术,不利于癌症控制。本研究旨在建立一种预测南非直肠癌(RC)局部病变患者GISOC的风险模型。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了现有结直肠癌患者登记资料。GISOC定义为在诊断为I-III期RC后62天接受手术或未接受I-III期RC手术。患者人口统计学、合并症、疾病分期和新辅助治疗接受情况被纳入分析的协变量。使用监督逻辑回归机器学习算法训练和测试适当的风险模型,并将其转换为nomogram。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析和AUC评估来建立nomogram的性能。结果:共纳入490例患者(训练数据集245例,测试数据集245例)。总的来说,有242例患者经历了GISOC(49.4%),其中33例(13.6%)未接受手术,209例(86.4%)延迟接受手术。训练的风险模型包括患者种族(印度人,优势比[OR] = 0.24;白色,OR = 0.23;v黑色)、合并症(OR = 2.29 v无合并症)和新辅助治疗接受情况(OR = 18.40 v无接受情况)。风险模型的auc为0.800。结论:建立了一个准确的、特定环境的风险模型和nomogram来预测RC患者的GISOC。在不使用技术的情况下,可以实施nomograph来识别GISOC的高风险患者,然后可以针对这些患者采取降低风险的干预措施。nomogram对现有外科单位工作流程的影响需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信