Emily K Koons, Shaojie Chang, Andrew D Missert, Hao Gong, Jamison E Thorne, Safa Hoodeshenas, Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Cynthia H McCollough, Shuai Leng
{"title":"Learned high resolution energy-integrating detector CT angiography: Harnessing the power of ultra-high-resolution photon counting detector CT.","authors":"Emily K Koons, Shaojie Chang, Andrew D Missert, Hao Gong, Jamison E Thorne, Safa Hoodeshenas, Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah, Cynthia H McCollough, Shuai Leng","doi":"10.1002/mp.17874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) is a widely used noninvasive diagnostic exam to assess patients for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the spatial resolution of most CT scanners is limited due to the use of energy-integrating detectors (EIDs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a convolutional neural network (Improved LUMEN visualization through Artificial super-resoluTion imagEs (ILUMENATE)) informed by photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT to improve EID-CT image resolution and determine its impact on cCTA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>With IRB approval, 30 patients undergoing clinically indicated cCTA were scanned with EID-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) and subsequently with ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) on the same day. ILUMENATE was trained on eight patient PCD-CT datasets (67,890 patch pairs with 90% for training (61,101), 10% reserved for validation (6,789)) and applied to 22 unseen EID-CT cases. Spatial resolution was evaluated using line profiles and percent diameter stenosis quantified with a severity score assigned. Two experienced radiologists, blinded to image type, selected preferred series and scored images for overall quality, sharpness, and noise comparing original EID-CT and ILUMENATE output.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual assessment and line profiles showed substantial resolution improvement with ILUMENATE. Percent diameter stenosis was significantly reduced (mean ± standard deviation: 4.42% ± 4.82%) using ILUMENATE (p < 0.001) with nine lesions shifting down in severity score. Readers preferred ILUMENATE images in 22/22 cases and scored ILUMENATE superiorly for overall quality, sharpness, and noise (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ILUMENATE enhanced image resolution, resulting in improved overall image quality, reduced calcium blooming artifacts, and improved lumen visibility in cCTA exams performed using EID-CT. This could potentially allow for improved accessibility to UHR image quality, allowing for more accurate assessment of CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) is a widely used noninvasive diagnostic exam to assess patients for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the spatial resolution of most CT scanners is limited due to the use of energy-integrating detectors (EIDs).
Purpose: To develop a convolutional neural network (Improved LUMEN visualization through Artificial super-resoluTion imagEs (ILUMENATE)) informed by photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT to improve EID-CT image resolution and determine its impact on cCTA.
Materials and methods: With IRB approval, 30 patients undergoing clinically indicated cCTA were scanned with EID-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) and subsequently with ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) on the same day. ILUMENATE was trained on eight patient PCD-CT datasets (67,890 patch pairs with 90% for training (61,101), 10% reserved for validation (6,789)) and applied to 22 unseen EID-CT cases. Spatial resolution was evaluated using line profiles and percent diameter stenosis quantified with a severity score assigned. Two experienced radiologists, blinded to image type, selected preferred series and scored images for overall quality, sharpness, and noise comparing original EID-CT and ILUMENATE output.
Results: Visual assessment and line profiles showed substantial resolution improvement with ILUMENATE. Percent diameter stenosis was significantly reduced (mean ± standard deviation: 4.42% ± 4.82%) using ILUMENATE (p < 0.001) with nine lesions shifting down in severity score. Readers preferred ILUMENATE images in 22/22 cases and scored ILUMENATE superiorly for overall quality, sharpness, and noise (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: ILUMENATE enhanced image resolution, resulting in improved overall image quality, reduced calcium blooming artifacts, and improved lumen visibility in cCTA exams performed using EID-CT. This could potentially allow for improved accessibility to UHR image quality, allowing for more accurate assessment of CAD.